ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2197

Steroid Bolus Leads to a Negative 18f-FDG PET/CT Scan in Large Vessel Vasculitis. Data from a Multicenter Giant Cell Arteritis Cohort Database

Paula Estrada1, Patricia Moya2, Hector Corominas3, Delia Reina4, Dacia Cerdà4, Daniel Roig Vilaseca4, Vanessa Navarro4, Sergi Heredia4 and Francisco Javier Narváez5, 1Rheumatology, Hospital Moisès Broggi-Hospital General de L´Hospitalet. Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain, 2Rheumatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain, 3Rheumatology, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain, 4Rheumatology, Hospital Moisès Broggi-Hospital General de L´Hospitalet. Consorci Sanitari Integral,, barcelona, Spain, 5Rheumatology Department, Hospital de Bellvitge. Barcelona. Spain, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: 18FDG PET/CT scan, giant cell arteritis, Glucocorticoids and polymyalgia rheumatica

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster III: Other Modalities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymialgia rheumatica (PMR) are overlapping inflammatory diseases. Large Vessel Vasculitis (LVV) is frequently present in any of the two subsets1. In some scenarios where complications such as visual loss or stroke are present, treatment with steroids bolus is a common practice. Imaging studies when suspecting LVV are as sensible and more easily available than temporal artery biopsy2. 18f-FDG PET/CT is useful to confirm mural inflammation in extracranial arteries to support diagnosis of LVV. Beside this rationale, some questions still remain unclear regarding the involvement of PET/CT in patients receiving steroids3.

Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, descriptive analysis of 18f-FDG PET/CT in 69 patients who met 2010 ACR criteria for GCA. Demographic data, cumulative GC prior to PET/CT, and vascular territories affected were collected. Patients included were either new diagnosis or those who had previous diagnosis of GCA or PMR, who had a relapse or complicated follow-up. PET/CT scan was reported either positive or negative for LVV for any of 8 major vascular territories: ascending aorta, arotic arch, descending thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, carotids, subclavian/ braquiocephalic, axillary/humeral and iliac/femoral arteries. Statistic analysis was done with c2 with Yates’ correction and exact Fischer’s test.

Results: Mean age: 72 years ± 5 yo, 68%, women. Territories mostly affected: thoracic aorta (75%), iliac/femoral arteries (54.2%) and supraaortic vessels (47.9%). In general, GC seemed to be associated with the possibility of a negative PET/CT scan. A subanalysis among patients allowed to classify into 3 groups: (1) no previous steroids (2) previous acummulated GC (3) steroid bolus previous to PET/CT. Group 2, showed a mean accumulated dose of GC 2,908.4 mg ± 339. A 31.8% of PET/CT scans were negative, interestingly 84% corresponded to the group of patients who had received a steroid bolus prior to the PET/TC (p 0.01) (Table 1).

positive PET/CT

negative PET/CT

Group 1, n= 29

27 ( 93.1%)

2 (6.9%)

Group 2, n= 27

18(66.7%)

9(33.3&)

Group 3, n=13

2(15.4%)

11(84.6%)

Conclusion:

Conclusions: Data from our multicenter cohort of LVV showed that thoracic aorta was the most frequent vessel affected, as expected. When steroid bolus was given, there was a strong association with a negative PET/CT scan, compared with patients who received either a variable dose or any dose of steroids. Our results confirmed something expected beforehand, but not yet described in a large cohort of patients.

  1. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kew273
  2. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212649
  3. doi:10.3899/jrheum.170138

Disclosure: P. Estrada, None; P. Moya, None; H. Corominas, None; D. Reina, None; D. Cerdà, None; D. Roig Vilaseca, None; V. Navarro, None; S. Heredia, None; F. J. Narváez, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Estrada P, Moya P, Corominas H, Reina D, Cerdà D, Roig Vilaseca D, Navarro V, Heredia S, Narváez FJ. Steroid Bolus Leads to a Negative 18f-FDG PET/CT Scan in Large Vessel Vasculitis. Data from a Multicenter Giant Cell Arteritis Cohort Database [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/steroid-bolus-leads-to-a-negative-18f-fdg-pet-ct-scan-in-large-vessel-vasculitis-data-from-a-multicenter-giant-cell-arteritis-cohort-database/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/steroid-bolus-leads-to-a-negative-18f-fdg-pet-ct-scan-in-large-vessel-vasculitis-data-from-a-multicenter-giant-cell-arteritis-cohort-database/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology