ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 408

State or Trait: Pain Catastrophizing and Widespread Pain Following TKR and Their Associations with Pain Relief

Emma Lape1, Faith Selzer1,2, Jamie E. Collins3,4, Elena Losina1,4 and Jeffrey N. Katz1,4, 1Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: patient outcomes, psychological status, psychosocial factors and total joint replacement, Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Orthopedics, Low Back Pain and Rehabilitation Poster – ACR/ARHP

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pain catastrophizing and widespread pain (WP) —constructs reflecting cognitive processes during the pain experience—predict disability, pain chronicity/severity, and lower quality of life in a range of conditions. Gaps remain in our understanding of the extent to which each is a stable (trait) or dynamic (state) variable. We assess a) the stability of pain catastrophizing and WP from before to after TKR and b) whether changes in these measures could be explained by changes in pain.

Methods: We used data from a prospective study of TKR recipients ages 40+. Questionnaires included a body pain diagram to assess WP, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS; 0-52, 52=worst), and WOMAC Pain (0-100, 100=worst). To calculate WP score, we summed the number of body regions, excluding the index knee, in which a subject attested to pain in the past week (maximum=7).

We divided subjects into 3 WP groups (0 vs. 1-2 vs. ≥3 pain regions) and into low and high PCS groups (≤16 vs. >16) at baseline and 12 months post-TKR. We assessed changes in group membership from baseline to 12 months. To assess whether changes in PCS and WP were associated with knee pain relief, we created 4 groups by amount of WOMAC pain improvement: <10, 10-29, 30-49, ³50. Changes in PCS score and WP were compared across these groups using ANOVA.

Results: 176 subjects completed the scales at baseline and 12 months; 64% were female, mean age was 66, and baseline median WOMAC pain was 40.

The number of subjects in the high PCS score group diminished from 45 (26%) pre- to 23 (13%) post-TKR. Mean PCS score diminished from 11 (SD: 10) to 6 (SD: 8). The number of subjects in each WP group was similar pre- and 12 months post-TKR. However, 73 subjects (41%) changed group and were similarly likely to worsen (55%) and to improve (45%). As Figure 1 depicts, most changes in PCS group were in the direction of improvement while, for WP group, similar proportions worsened and improved.

Improvements in PCS score were associated with WOMAC pain reductions. The group with most pain relief (≥50 points) had a greater mean improvement in PCS score (11 (SD:12)) than the group with least pain relief (4 (SD: 12)) (p = 0.02). We did not find a statistically significant association between change in WP and change in WOMAC.

Conclusion: 71% of those with baseline high PCS improved sufficiently to join the low PCS group after TKR. PCS score improvements were associated with pain relief, suggesting that the present measure of catastrophizing reflects state-like aspects that diminish along with pain. In contrast, WP scores were as likely to increase as to decrease after TKR, regardless of knee pain relief. The findings urge caution in interpreting PCS and WP as trait measures in MSK pain research.

Figure 1. Percent of subjects changing PCS or WP group membership from baseline to 12 months


Disclosure: E. Lape, None; F. Selzer, None; J. E. Collins, None; E. Losina, Samumed, LLC, 5,Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 9; J. N. Katz, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 9,Osteoarthritis Research Society International, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lape E, Selzer F, Collins JE, Losina E, Katz JN. State or Trait: Pain Catastrophizing and Widespread Pain Following TKR and Their Associations with Pain Relief [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/state-or-trait-pain-catastrophizing-and-widespread-pain-following-tkr-and-their-associations-with-pain-relief/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/state-or-trait-pain-catastrophizing-and-widespread-pain-following-tkr-and-their-associations-with-pain-relief/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology