ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 119

Sonographic Evaluation of the Fifth Metatarsophalangeal Joint Erosion in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Nevsun Inanc1, Gulsen Ozen1, Sibel Z. Aydin2, Esen Kasapoglu Gunal3 and Haner Direskeneli1, 1Department of Rheumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Department of Rheumatology, Koc University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 3Department of Rheumatology, Goztepe Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: joint destruction, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ultrasonography

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases: Ultrasound

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Joint erosions in RA correlate with structural damage progression and functional capacity. Therefore, detection and the follow-up of erosions are of paramount importance for RA diagnosis, monitoring and prognostication. The 5th MTP is usually the first and most commonly destructed joint in RA. Ultrasound (US) is a useful and as good tool as MRI to detect 5th MTP erosions especially in early RA patients. Although a few MRI studies revelaed that most of the MTP erosions were located at the plantar aspect of the joint, it is unknown whether plantar or dorsal or lateral plane US better detects 5th MTP erosions.  In this study we aimed to determine the best ultrasonographic plane for detection of 5th MTP joint erosion in RA patients and to assess clinical characteristics of patients with 5thMTP erosions.

Methods: The 5thMTP of 92 feet of 48 RA patients were evaluated by B-mode and power- Doppler US for signs of erosion. US images were obtained from 3 different aspects, the dorsal, lateral and the plantar surface of the foot, in longitudinal and tranverse scans.  The presence of erosion was determined according to OMERACT definition. Patients were also assessed clinically (tender/swollen joint count, DAS28, HAQ scores) along with disease characteristics. Each erosion in each aspect were recorded seperately. 

Results: The study cohort consisted of 48 RA patients (F/M=35/13, mean age 50.7±12.3 years, mean DAS28 score 4.04±1.47, HAQ score 0.94±0.88) with mean disease duration of 8.2±7.3 years. RF and anti- CCP positivity were 66.7% and 60.4% respectively. The 5th MTP erosions were detected in 35 of 48 patients (72.9%) and 62 of 92 feet (67.4%). Of the erosions 15 (16.3%) were observed at dorsal plane whereas plantar and lateral planes revelaed majority of the erosions, 53 (57.6%) and 52 (56.5%), respectively.  In 26 feet (28.3%), erosions were observed on both plantar and lateral planes, in 15 feet (16.3%) erosions were observed in all three planes. None of the patients had erosion just in dorsal plane examination of the 5th MTP.  The presence of 5th MTP erosion in plantar aspect of foot was significantly higher than both lateral and dorsal aspect (P<0.0001, P=0.002, respectively). Patients with dorsal erosion had significantly higher disease duration (13.8 years vs 6.5 years, P=0.005). Patients with erosions in any aspects have similar disease characteristics including RF, anti-CCP positivity, disease duration, HAQ scores and current biologic requirement, when compared to patients without erosions. 

Conclusion: The 5th MTP erosions in RA patients can be better detected with plantar plane US than dorsal and lateral aspect evaluations. These data also indicate that dorsal aspect US of foot may miss erosions in early disease and insufficient when performed solely.


Disclosure:

N. Inanc,
None;

G. Ozen,
None;

S. Z. Aydin,
None;

E. Kasapoglu Gunal,
None;

H. Direskeneli,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sonographic-evaluation-of-the-fifth-metatarsophalangeal-joint-erosion-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology