ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1648

Smoking Status in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: An Irish Perspective

Conor Magee1, Oliver FitzGerald2, Flora Farkas1, Natsumi Ikumi1, Phil Gallagher3, Agnes Szentpetery4 and Brian Kirby5, 1Rheumatology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 2Department of Rheumatology, St Vincent's University Hospital and Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, 3St. Vincent's University Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Dublin, Ireland, 4Rheumatology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland, 5Dermatology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Clinical/Epidemiology Studies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The BIOmarkers of COMorbidities (BIOCOM) in psoriasis study is a longitudinal study which aims to identify clinical, genetic or protein biomarker features associated with the development of co-morbidities, notably Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), in patients with psoriasis.

There is a well-established association between smoking and psoriasis, and between smoking and PsA, in the general population. Paradoxically, smoking has been shown to be negatively associated with the development of PsA in patients with established psoriasis. Herein we describe the prevalence of smoking in this BIOCOM cohort.

Methods:

Patients with psoriasis were recruited from the dermatology clinics at St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin. Inclusion criteria included disease duration of less than 10 years and an age of 18 years or older. Patients with another serious active medical illness, a previous diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis or those who were receiving systemic immunosuppressant therapy for psoriasis were excluded.

Patients with PsA were recruited from the rheumatology clinics at St. Vincent’s University Hospital. Patients had to meet CASPAR (ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria for inclusion in the study.

Results:

To date 190 patients with psoriasis have been recruited. Of those, 9 were excluded due to a diagnosis of psoriasis > 10 years previously. One was excluded due to a previous diagnosis of JIA. This left 180 patients with psoriasis who were brought in for an initial assessment. After the initial assessment 7 patients were diagnosed with PsA, meeting CASPAR criteria. This left 173 patients for inclusion in the analysis.

100 patients with established PsA were recruited and were included in the study.

Table 1 describes demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population at baseline assessment.

Psoriasis

PsA

Age, mean +/- SD years

41.3 +/- 14.9

52.4 +/- 10.5

Male Sex, number (percentage)

105 (60.7)

55 (55.0)

Duration of Psoriasis,

mean +/- SD years

6.2 +/- 2.9

26.1 +/- 13.1

Duration of PsA,

Mean +/- SD years

17.9 +/- 10.0

PASI score, mean +/- SD

7.3 +/- 3.9

3.6 +/- 3.2

Type 1 Psoriasis, number (percentage)

107 (61.9)

86 (86.0)

The proportion of smokers (current and past) was lower in the PsA group compared to the psoriasis group: 52.0 versus 63.6. Table 2 shows smoking characteristics of patients with PsA and psoriasis.

Smoking Status

Psoriasis

PsA

p Value

Never Smoked, number (percentage)

63 (36.4)

48 (48.0)

0.06

Current, number (percentage)

49 (28.3)

10 (10.0)

<0.001

Past, number (percentage)

61 (35.3)

42 (42.0)

0.268

Conclusion:

Analysis of patients recruited to date for the BIOCOM-Pso study shows a higher percentage of smokers (current and past) in the psoriasis group compared to the PsA group. The proportion of smokers (current and past) in the PsA group was comparable to the general Irish population.

These findings are consistent with previous studies that showed a negative association between smoking and the development of PsA in patients with psoriasis. However, prospective follow-up of patients with psoriasis, which is ongoing in this BIOCOM cohort, is required to further elucidate the role of smoking in the development of PsA.


Disclosure: C. Magee, None; O. FitzGerald, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, 2,AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, UCB, 9; F. Farkas, None; N. Ikumi, None; P. Gallagher, None; A. Szentpetery, None; B. Kirby, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Magee C, FitzGerald O, Farkas F, Ikumi N, Gallagher P, Szentpetery A, Kirby B. Smoking Status in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: An Irish Perspective [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/smoking-status-in-patients-with-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthritis-an-irish-perspective/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/smoking-status-in-patients-with-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthritis-an-irish-perspective/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology