ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1826

Small LDL-P Increases with Increased Disease Activity in SLE

Laura Durcan1, Deborah Winegar2, Margery Connelly2, James Otvos2, Laurence S Magder3 and Michelle Petri1, 1Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 2LabCorp, Raleigh, NC, 3Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of MD, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Disease Activity, SLE and lipids

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) associates with accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease which is not fully explained by traditional CV risk factors. Disease activity, prednisone treatment and immunologic abnormalities are thought to contribute. Dyslipidemia is common in SLE patients, who have mild elevations in triglycerides (TG) and sometimes low HDL cholesterol levels. Recent evidence suggests that low density lipoprotein particle number (LDL-P) is a better marker of cardiovascular risk than LDL cholesterol levels. Lipoprotein subclass analyses have shown that SLE patients have larger VLDL particles and lower levels of large HDL particles compared to control subjects, but little is known about how these markers change with disease activity. We evaluated SLE patients during high disease activity and compared this to no or low disease activity to determine how lipoproteins change with active SLE.

Methods:

Patients were identified as part of a longitudinal lupus cohort. At each visit, plasma samples were collected. Global disease activity was measured using the SLEDAI. Patients were included who had at least one visit with SLEDAI of 4+ (high disease activity) and one visit with SLEDAI<3 (low disease activity).  Plasma was analyzed for lipoprotein particle concentrations using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). The NMR spectrum also contains a signal termed GlycA derived from the carbohydrate chains of circulating acute phase glycoproteins that is a marker of systemic inflammation. Lipoprotein particle and GlycA levels were compared between high activity and no or low disease activity visits using t-tests. Further analysis compared consecutive visits to see whether changes in lipoprotein parameters were associated with a flare.

Results:

Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria (97% female, age range 19-76, 48% Caucasian and 48% African American).  The mean number of visits per person with high Vs. low disease activity were 2.1 and 2.4 respectively.  The total LDL particle number (LDL-P) and small LDL-P levels were higher with disease activity as was VLDL size (Table 1).  GlycA levels were unchanged with active disease but were higher than those described for healthy populations.

Conclusion:

Although the lipoprotein profiles of SLE patients have been previously described, alterations in these profiles with disease activity have not been investigated. Here we demonstrate, for the first time in adult SLE, adverse changes in novel lipid parameters with disease activity. Thus, we can now demonstrate one potential mechanism by which SLE disease activity influences atherosclerosis. GlycA was unchanged with disease activity, but higher than reported controls, which may make it useful in stratification of CV risk in SLE.

Table 1.  Mean Person-specific differences in marker level between visits with and without disease activity.

Marker

Mean (SD) during visits with SLEDAI 4+

Mean (SD) during visits with SLEDAI <=3

Mean (SD) Difference

P-value

Total VLDL & Chylomicrons

50.5 (28.0)

53.1 (21.2)

-2.6 (30.1)

0.63

Large VLDL particles

3.3 (2.2)

3.0 (1.9)

0.3 ( 1.5)

0.30

Medium VLDL particles

13.3 (8.7)

12.3 (8.6)

1.0 (7.3)

0.44

Small VLDL particles

33.9 (23.0)

37.8 (18.9)

-3.8 (26.5)

0.41

Total LDL particles

1047.8 (317.7)

976.6 (309.8)

71.2 (145.9)

0.0085

IDL particles

223.9 (81.4)

239.4 (103.4)

-15.4 (89.1)

0.33

Large LDL particles

369.2 (276.9)

365.7 (221.1)

3.4 (175.7)

0.91

Small LDL particle

454.7 (266.4)

371.5 (229.5)

83.2 (156.5)

0.0045

Total HDL particles

31.2 (9.2)

31.7 (7.2)

-0.5 (5.8)

0.60

Large HDL particles

9.0 (4.3)

9.7 (4.5)

-0.7 (2.7)

0.15

Medium HDL particles

10.1 (5.0)

11.2 (4.1)

-1.0 (5.1)

0.26

Small HDL particles

12.1 (6.2)

10.9 (5.6)

1.2 (5.6)

0.23

VLDL size

48.3 (6.1)

46.2 (6.4)

2.1 (6.4)

0.075

LDL size

21.1 (0.8)

21.2 (0.6)

-0.1 (0.7)

0.42

HDL size

9.8 (0.6)

9.8 (0.6)

-0.02 (0.3)

0.71

Triglycerides

109.5 (35.4)

108.3 (32.1)

1.2 (27.2)

0.79

HDL-C

56.5 (20.4)

59.0 (18.4)

-2.5 (10.8)

0.20

Insulin resistance score

35.3 (19.9)

31.7 (19.5)

3.6 (13.6)

0.14

GlycA

486.2 (81.6)

469.7 (82.4)

16.5 (82.4)

0.26


Disclosure: L. Durcan, None; D. Winegar, LabCorp/Liposcience, 3; M. Connelly, LabCorp/LipoScience, 3; J. Otvos, None; L. S. Magder, None; M. Petri, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Durcan L, Winegar D, Connelly M, Otvos J, Magder LS, Petri M. Small LDL-P Increases with Increased Disease Activity in SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/small-ldl-p-increases-with-increased-disease-activity-in-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/small-ldl-p-increases-with-increased-disease-activity-in-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology