ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2643

Sledai-2K Responder Index-50 Is Effective in Demonstrating Partial Response in a Phase 2, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Ustekinumab in Patients with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Zahi Touma1, Murray Urowitz2, Dafna D Gladman2, Carrie Wagner3, Bei Zhou3, Robert Gordon3, Benjamin Hsu3, Marc Chevrier3 and Shawn Rose3, 1University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Krembil Research Institute, U of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, randomized trials and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Ustekinumab (UST), a monoclonal antibody that targets the shared p40 subunit of the cytokines IL-12 & IL-23, is being investigated in patients (pts) w/ active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). While traditional SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) scoring assesses complete SLE response for individual disease manifestations, the SLEDAI-2K Responder Index-50 (S2K RI-50) can be used to evaluate SLE responses using partial improvement (≥50%) in each domain. To evaluate SLEDAI-2K vs S2K RI-50 response in a randomized, placebo (PBO) controlled trial of UST in pts w/ active SLE.

Methods: We conducted a phase 2, PBO-controlled study in adults w/ active disease (SLEDAI score ≥6 with ≥1 BILAG A &/or ≥2 BILAG B scores) despite standard-of-care therapy. Pts (n=102) were randomized (3:2) to receive UST IV ~6 mg/kg or PBO at week (wk) 0, followed by SC injections of UST 90mg q8w or PBO beginning at wk8, both added to standard of care. We calculated S2K RI-50 response at wk24 using various thresholds to define response including a decrease of at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 points from baseline in the S2K RI-50 score. We also compared the proportion of patients w/ SLEDAI-2K response vs S2K RI-50 response in pts receiving UST (n=62) vs PBO (n=40) at wk24.

Results: Change from baseline SLEDAI-2K & S2K RI-50 scores were strongly correlated (R=0.92, p<0.0001) at wk24. A greater proportion of UST vs PBO pts achieved S2K RI‑50 response at wk24, regardless of threshold used to define response (Table). The greatest differences in S2K RI‑50 response rates between UST vs PBO were observed for a 4-point decrease (23.3%, p=0.010), a 5-point decrease (22.8%, p=0.023), & a 6-point decrease (26.5%, p=0.014) from baseline. S2K RI-50 captured more responders than SLEDAI-2K at wk24, however, the difference in SLEDAI-2K 4-point response in UST vs PBO was D27% (p=0.005) while S2K RI-50 was D23% (p=0.010).

Conclusion: S2K RI-50 is an instrument that can capture partial clinically important improvement of ≥ 50% in SLE disease manifestations. The data suggests cutpoints for defining S2K RI-50 response in clinical trials of patients with moderate-to-severe SLE disease activity.

Table 1. S2K RI-50 response rates at Wk24 for various thresholds to define response

Decrease from Baseline

UST (%)a,b

PBO (%)a,b

Difference between UST & PBO

p-valuec

1 Point Decrease

95.3

88.6

6.7

0.1334

2 Point Decrease

93.5

79.3

14.2

0.0337

3 Point Decrease

84.1

70.9

13.2

0.0820

4 Point Decrease

84.0

60.7

23.3

0.0104

5 Point Decrease

73.5

50.7

22.8

0.0234

6 Point Decrease

70.5

44.0

26.5

0.0138

Note: S2K RI-50 response is defined differently in each row using different cutoffs.

S2K RI-50 uses partial response definition of ≥50% improvement for each individual SLEDAI-2K descriptor.

a Values for subjects meeting treatment failure criteria are set to missing from point of treatment failure forward.

b Response based upon multiple imputations for missing data from Wk16 to Wk24, where Markov chain Monte Carlo method is used to make missing pattern monotone & serial logistic regression is used to impute monotone missing.  The imputation model includes treatment group & baseline SLEDAI-2K covariate.

c Test for greater treatment effect in UST over PBO (alternative hypothesis) is based upon logistic regression w/ treatment group, baseline SLEDAI-2K, baseline medication use for SLE & race as covariates.

 


Disclosure: Z. Touma, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; M. Urowitz, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; D. D. Gladman, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2; C. Wagner, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; B. Zhou, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; R. Gordon, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; B. Hsu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; M. Chevrier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3; S. Rose, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Touma Z, Urowitz M, Gladman DD, Wagner C, Zhou B, Gordon R, Hsu B, Chevrier M, Rose S. Sledai-2K Responder Index-50 Is Effective in Demonstrating Partial Response in a Phase 2, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Ustekinumab in Patients with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sledai-2k-responder-index-50-is-effective-in-demonstrating-partial-response-in-a-phase-2-randomized-placebo-controlled-study-of-ustekinumab-in-patients-with-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sledai-2k-responder-index-50-is-effective-in-demonstrating-partial-response-in-a-phase-2-randomized-placebo-controlled-study-of-ustekinumab-in-patients-with-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology