ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2004

Simplified Assessment in Capillaroscopy

Virginia Durigan1, Anastasia Secco2, Felix Enrique Romanini3, Virginia Ortiz3, Marta Mamani3 and Leticia Sormani de Fonseca3, 1Reumatology, Hospital Bernardino Rivadavia, CABA, Argentina, 2Rheumatology, Hospital Bernardino Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3Hospital Bernardino Rivadavia, CABA, Argentina

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Capillaroscopy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Nailfold Capillaroscopy is a non-invasive diagnostic technique designed to evaluate small vessels of the microcirculation. The most important indication for capillaroscopy is Raynaud’s phenomenon. The complexity and meticulous evaluation of the eight fingers is difficult to apply in daily practice given the limited availability of time to perform. For this reason it is necessary to develop simple and abbreviated techniques, to achieve an optimal and rapid evaluation of the patient. The objective of this study is determine the performance of the method of the 4° finger for the diagnosis of SD pattern in patients with Raynaud’s phenomenon taking the eight finger pattern as a gold standard.

Methods: Cross-sectional study with blinded and independent measurements. Nailfold Capillaroscopy was performed on the four fingers of each hand, except thumbs. Another observer evaluated the 4th finger of the hands. The interobserver agreement was made before carrying out the study and was 100%.The 8-finger method (gold standard) was considered positive when at least one finger has SD pattern and the 4° finger method was considered positive when at least one of them presents the SD pattern. We included patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of Raynaud Phenomenon and suspected autoimmune disease. Patients with thickening of the skin in the nailfold, digital lesion that made it difficult to assess (trauma, amputation, burns, etc.) and patients who did not consent to the procedure were excluded.

Results: We included 78 patients, 90% was female. The mean age was 53 years ( +/- 13.5). Sixty-three patients had a score of eight fingers positive (cases) and 15 had a score of eight fingers negative (controls). The sensitivity of the 4° finger evaluation method was 89% (95% CI: 82-96%) and 93% specificity (95% CI: 88-99%). The positive predictive value of this method was 98% (95% CI: 95-100%) and the negative predictive value was 67% (95% CI: 56-77%). The positive likelihood ratio was 13 (95% CI: 2-89).

Conclusion: The simplified method of the 4° finger showed good performance for the diagnosis of SD pattern compared to the standard method of evaluation of the 8 fingers.


Disclosure: V. Durigan, None; A. Secco, None; F. E. Romanini, None; V. Ortiz, None; M. Mamani, None; L. Sormani de Fonseca, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Durigan V, Secco A, Romanini FE, Ortiz V, Mamani M, Sormani de Fonseca L. Simplified Assessment in Capillaroscopy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/simplified-assessment-in-capillaroscopy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/simplified-assessment-in-capillaroscopy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology