ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 552

Simple Questions in the Dermatology Office May Reasonably Exclude, but Do Not Reliably Identify Psoriatic Arthritis Patients: Results From the Center of Excellence for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

Neha Garg1, Atul A. Deodhar2, Benjamin Ehst3, Andrew Blauvelt4, Jennifer Ku5 and Brian Truong4, 1Internal Medicine, Division of arthritis and rheumatic diseases, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, 2Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 3Dermatology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, 4Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, 5Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects between 10-30% of patients with psoriasis (PsO), but is often missed when assessed in a dermatology clinic. The Center of Excellence for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (CEPPA) is a specialized multidisciplinary clinic consisting of expert dermatologists and rheumatologists experienced in diagnosing PsO as well as PsA. We wanted to identify simple clinical questions and findings on physical examination for dermatologists to screen PsO patients for PsA so as to refer appropriate patients to rheumatology.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of all PsO patients seen by dermatologists in the CEPPA clinic since its inception in 2006 through 2010. Possibility of PsA was assessed by four screening questions: “Do you have a history of joint pain or swelling,” “Do you have morning stiffness,” “Have you ever had x-rays taken”,” and “Do you have PsA”.  Since nail involvement is known to predict development of PsA, assessment of nail changes was included as a physical finding for screening. Quality of life (QoL) measures were assessed with validated instruments (SF12, PQOL12 and RAPID3).

Results: Of 524 patients assessed in dermatology, 237 were referred to rheumatology, 34 were lost to follow up, 203 were evaluated and 128 (24.4%) were found to have PsA. Of those who answered ‘no’ to all the four screening questions 95.3 % did not have PsA. However, of those fulfilling all five parameters, including the four screening questions plus nail changes, 88.9 % had PsA.  Table shows the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for screening questions and nail changes individually and in combination. The median age (48 years) and smoking history (in 20%) was not significantly different in patients with and without PsA. The median body mass index (BMI) and PsO body surface area (BSA) were significantly higher in patients with PsA than those without [31.5(IQR 11) vs 28.6 (IQR 8) and 10% (IQR 15) vs 7% (IQR 12), respectively, p <0.01]. PsA patients were more likely to have nail changes (OR 12.4, 95% CI: 5.9 – 26.5, P < 0.01). Onset of PsO occurred 10 years earlier in patients with a family history of PsO than those without (median age 25 vs 38, p <0.01). Six percent of patients developed PsA before, 8% with and 86% after the onset of PsO. Ninety percent were diagnosed with PsA within 25 years of PsO onset. Mean delay in PsA diagnosis from onset of joint pain was 1 year. Compared to PsO patients, patients with PsA had significantly worse QoL scores (P < 0.01). Percent of BSA involvement with PsO did not correlate with any clinical variables.

Conclusion: In this large cohort of PsO patients, the prevalence of PsA was 24.4%. PsA patients had significantly worse QoL than those with PsO alone. A negative response to all four screening questions correctly ruled out the diagnosis of PsA in 95.3% of patients. Positive response to all four screening questions with PsO nail changes led to a correct diagnosis of PsA in 89% of patients.

Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of four screening questions and examination for psoriatic nail changes
Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Do you have joint pain or swelling 88.7 54.7 41.8 93
Do you have morning stiffness 88.5 51 39.3 92.6
Do you have psoriatic arthritis 68.1 86.6 64.8 88.2
Have you ever had x-rays taken 56.6 73.2 43.2 82.4
Have you ever had x-rays taken 85.4 68.1 70.7 83.8
All five of the above 22.4 95.9 88.9 46.1

Disclosure:

N. Garg,
None;

A. A. Deodhar,
None;

B. Ehst,
None;

A. Blauvelt,
None;

J. Ku,
None;

B. Truong,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/simple-questions-in-the-dermatology-office-may-reasonably-exclude-but-do-not-reliably-identify-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-results-from-the-center-of-excellence-for-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthriti/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology