ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2413

Similar Response Rates to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor and Non- Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic Therapies in Ethnic Minority Patients at 6 Months

Gail S. Kerr1, Yusuf Yazici2, Christopher Swearingen3, Luis R. Espinoza4, Edward L. Treadwell5, Yvonne Sherrer6, Angelia Mosley-WIlliams7, Ignacio Garcia-Valladares8, Rodolfo Perez Alamino9, Sharon Dowell10, Mercedes Quinones11, Akgun Ince12, Theresa Lawrence Ford13, Chunqiao Luo14, Adrian Godoy10 and John Amatruda15, 1Rheumatology, Washington DC VAMC, Georgetown and Howard University, Washington, DC, 2Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 3Pediatrics and Biostatistics, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, 4Medicine-Section of Rheum, LSU Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, 5Dept Medicine Div of Rheum, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 6Rheum/Immunology, Centre Rheum Immunol Arthritis, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 7Rheumatology, Detroit VAMC, Detroit, MI, 8Immunology and Rheumatology, Hospital General de Occidente, Zapopan, Jal., Mexico, 9internal Medicine, LSUHSC, New Orleans, LA, 10Division of Rheumatology, Howard University, Washington, DC, 11Division of Rheumatology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, 12Arthitis Consultants Inc, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 13North Georgia Rheumatology Group, PC, Lawrenceville, GA, 14University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 15Rheumatology, Howard University, Washington, DC

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical Response and ethics

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Similar Response Rates to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor and Non- Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Biologic Therapies in Ethnic Minority Patients

Background/Purpose: Biologic therapies have expanded the treatment options and strategies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic response rates are well established, in multi-ethnic populations, the response to anti-TNF and non- anti-TNF agents is unknown. Hence, we evaluated the response rates to RA biologic therapies in a diverse ethnic cohort

Methods: Ethnic Minority RA Consortium (EMRAC) patients with follow up data were evaluated. Comparisons of patient socio-demographic (age, gender, race, education, smoking), RA disease status (disease duration, RF, ACPA, nodules/erosions), DMARD use, and disease activity (RAPID3) were made between anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF therapies using chi-square test of categorical variables and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. A logistic regression analysis associating RAPID3 outcome (low/moderate disease vs severe disease) at last follow-up encounter with anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF therapies adjusting for age, disease duration, gender, smoking, race and baseline RAPID3 was performed

Results: EMRAC analysis of biologic responses in 350 subjects with an average followup of 8 months was performed (Table) More Caucasians received biologic therapies and anti-TNF use was most common. Anti-TNF patients were similar to non-anti-TNF patients in all demographic and clinical characteristics, including use of DMARD therapy. While, baseline RAPID3 was significantly higher in non-anti-TNF than anti-TNF patients, there was no significant difference in proportions of patients achieving RAPID3 outcome between biologic groups (P=0.969), adjusting for age, duration, gender, smoking, and baseline RAPID3.  Moreover, no differences between races were observed in achieving RAPID3 outcome (P=0.688, regression).

Conclusion: There is a similar prevalence of use and response to anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF biologic agents in ethnic minority RA patients in routine clinical care. Follow up analyses are needed to assess sustained clinical response and outcomes to the varied biologic armamentaria, inclusive of ethnic subsets.

 

Patient Characteristics of Biologic Use in EMRAC Cohort

Biologics

Anti-TNF

Other

P

N

 

276

74

 

Age (years)

52.0 (14.6)

53.9 (14.7)

0.366

Education (years)

14.7 (3.5)

14.8 (3.5)

0.862

Duration (years)

9.7 (7.8)

10.6 (8.5)

0.475

Drug Treatment (months)

7.9 (6.0)

7.5 (5.5)

0.654

ACPA

161.9 (93.9)

174.9 (104.2)

0.564

RF

337.2 (373.7)

436.7 (555.5)

0.903

Baseline RAPID3

11.8 (7.4)

15.4 (6.5)

<0.001

Female (N %)

230 (83.6%)

63 (85.1%)

0.755

Hx Smoking (N %)

66 (31.7%)

15 (36.6)

0.544

Hx Erosion (N %)

41 (21.7%)

12 (35.5%)

0.086

Hx Nodules (N %)

15 (8.5%)

5 (17.9%)

0.123

DMARD Use (N %)

212 (76.8%)

56 (75.7%)

0.838

Race

0.119

Caucasian

111 (46.4%)

37 (53.6%)

African-American

48 (20.1%)

12 (17.4%)

Hispanic

51 (21.3%)

18 (26.1%)

Other

29 (12.1%)

2 (2.9%)

Final RAPID3

0.432*

Low / Moderate

58 (28.3%)

8 (13.6%)

 

Severe

147 (71.7%)

51 (86.4%)

* Logistic Regression adjusting for Age, Duration, Race, Smoking and Baseline RAPID3

 


Disclosure:

G. S. Kerr,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2;

Y. Yazici,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2,

Abbvie,

5,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

5,

Celgene,

5;

C. Swearingen,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

L. R. Espinoza,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

E. L. Treadwell,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

Y. Sherrer,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

A. Mosley-WIlliams,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

I. Garcia-Valladares,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

R. Perez Alamino,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

S. Dowell,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

M. Quinones,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

A. Ince,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2;

T. Lawrence Ford,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

2,

Human Genome Sciences, Inc.,

2,

Abbive,

2,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

9,

Questcor,

8,

Abbvie,

8,

UCB,

8,

Pfizer Inc,

8,

Amgen,

8,

Takeda,

8,

Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,

8;

C. Luo,
None;

A. Godoy,
None;

J. Amatruda,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/similar-response-rates-to-anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-and-non-anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-biologic-therapies-in-ethnic-minority-patients-at-6-months/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology