ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2393

Similar Improvements in Physical Function, Quality of Life and Work Productivity Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with 2 Different Doses of Methotrexate  in Combination with Adalimumab

Gurjit S. Kaeley1, Midori Jane Nishio2, Daryl MacCarter3, Jenny Griffith4, Hartmut Kupper5, Vishvas Garg6 and Jasmina Kalabic5, 1College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, 2Diablo Clinical Research, Walnut Creek, CA, 3Coeur d'Alene Arthritis Clinic, Coeur d'Alene, ID, 4AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 5AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany, 6AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, methotrexate (MTX), patient outcomes and quality measures

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose Methotrexate (MTX) is used in monotherapy or in combination with other DMARDs in the treatment of patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the effects of low and high MTX doses in combination with initiation of ADA on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in MTX-inadequate responders (MTX-IR) with moderate-to-severe RA.

Methods

MUSICA (NCT01185288) was a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of 2 different dosages of MTX, 7.5 or 20 mg/week (wk) in combination with ADA (40 mg every other wk) for 24 wks in MTX-IR RA pts. Pts entering the study had been receiving ≥15 mg/wk MTX for at least 12 wks. At each study visit, from baseline (BL) to wk 24, the following PROs were recorded: physical functioning, work productivity and activity impairment, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), using the health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), work productivity and impairment (WPAI), and the short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires, respectively. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to account for missing values.

Results

154 pts were enrolled in the 7.5 mg/wk MTX+ADA arm, and 155 pts in the 20 mg/wk MTX+ADA arm. Both arms were similar for BL demographics (mean age 54.8, mean disease duration 5.3 years) and disease characteristics (mean DAS28(CRP) of 5.8). In the low and high MTX dosage groups respectively, mean BL HAQ-DI scores were 1.5, mean percentages (%) of time in absenteeism at BL were 9.2 and 10.1; mean % of time in presenteeism at BL were 45.0 and 47.6; mean % of activity impairment at BL were 57.0 and 61.9. BL SF-36 (physical component) scores were 31.5 for both groups, and BL SF-36 (mental component) scores were 44.7 and 41.9 for the low and high-dosage groups respectively. After 24 wks, significant improvements from BL were observed for both MTX dosage groups, in the WPAI (except for absenteeism), HAQ-DI and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 (table). Differences in physical function, QoL and work productivity observed between the low and high dosage MTX groups were not statistically significant.

Table 1. Effect of treatment with ADA + low or high dose MTX on patient outcomes at week 24

Outcome measure

n

Change  from BL to wk 24, mean (95% CI)

P-value  (BL and wk 24 mean scores)

wk 24, mean score (95% CI)

P-value (between wk 24 mean scores of dosage groups)

HAQ

7.5mg/wk MTX+ADA

151

-0.5 (-0.6, -0.4)

<.001

1.0 (0.9, 1.1)

    0.476

20mg/wk MTX+ADA

154

-0.5 (-0.6, -0.4)

<.001

1.0 (0.8, 1.1)

 

WPAI-absenteeism

7.5mg/wk MTX+ADA

63

-2.9% (-8.4, 2.5)

   0.288

6.3% (1.9, 10.6)

   0.261

20mg/wk MTX+ADA

61

0.6% (-7.1, 8.2)

   0.882

10.6% (4.7,16.6)

 

WPAI-presenteeism

7.5mg/wk MTX+ADA

66

-17.9% (-24.5, -11.3)

            <.001

27.1% (20.9, 33.3)

    0.700

20mg/wk MTX+ADA

63

-21.0% (-28.4, -13.6)

            <.001

26.7% (20.0, 33.3)

 

WPAI- Overall Work impairment

7.5mg/wk MTX+ADA

63

-19.0% (-26.6, -11.4)

  <.001

29.2% (22.9, 36.4)

    0.580

20mg/wk MTX+ADA

61

-17.5% (-26.5, -8.4)

  <.001

32.7% (24.7, 40.7)

 

WPAI-Activity impairment

7.5mg/wk MTX+ADA

137

-14.9% (-19.6, -10.2)

  <.001

     42.1% (37.0, 47.3)

    0.278

20mg/wk MTX+ADA

143

-20.4% (-25.3, -15.4)

  <.001

     41.5% (36.5, 46.6)

 

SF-36-physical component

7.5mg/wk MTX+ADA

150

7.2 (5.7, 8.7)

  <.001

 38.8 (37.0, 40.5)

    0.835

20mg/wk MTX+ADA

152

7.4 (6.1, 8.8)

   <.001

 38.9 (37.3, 40.6)

 

SF-36-mental component

7.5mg/wk MTX+ADA

150

3.7 (1.9, 5.6)

    <.001

 48.8 (47.0, 50.5)

     0.759

20mg/wk MTX+ADA

152

4.8 (2.9, 6.7)

     <.001

46.5 (44.7, 48.3)

 

P-values between dosage groups at wk 24 determined by ANCOVA

 

Conclusion

Similar to observations in pts with early RA,1the addition of ADA to MTX in pts with moderate to severe disease and insufficient MTX response, led to improvements in physical function, work productivity and quality of life after 24 wks. The improvements were observed regardless of the MTX dosage. Similar improvements in the two MTX dosage groups support the idea that MTX dose could be reduced in some MTX-IR pts while initiating ADA therapy.

Reference:

  1. Burmester GR et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;0:1-8

Disclosure:

G. S. Kaeley,

AbbVie,

5;

M. J. Nishio,

AbbVie,

8;

D. MacCarter,

AbbVie,

5,

AbbVie,

8;

J. Griffith,

AbbVie, Inc.,

3,

AbbVie, Inc.,

1;

H. Kupper,

AbbVie,

3,

AbbVie,

1;

V. Garg,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3;

J. Kalabic,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/similar-improvements-in-physical-function-quality-of-life-and-work-productivity-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-2-different-doses-of-methotrexate-in-combination-with-adalimumab/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology