ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2464

Similar Effectiveness of Both Formulations of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Switching from Intravenous (IV) to Subcutaneous (SC) at 6 Months in Real Life

Jean Darloy1, René-Marc Flipo1, Nicolas Segaud2, Jean-Paul Eschard3, Vincent Goeb4, Jean-Hugues Salmon3, Eric Houvenagel5, Clément Chopin3, Samuel Gally6, David Pau7, Isabelle Idier8 and Guy Baudens9, 1Rheumatology, Rheumatology Department CHU Teaching Hospital Lille, Lille, France, 2Internal medicine, Internal Medicine Departement Armentières Hospital, Armentières, France, 3Rheumatology, Rheumatology Department CHU Teaching Hospital Reims, Reims, France, 4Rheumatologie, Rheumatology Department CHU Teaching Hospital Amiens, Amiens, France, 5Rheumatology, Groupe Hospitalier de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Lomme, France, 6Clinical Operations, Roche SAS, Boulogne Billancourt, France, 7Statistics, Roche SAS, Boulogne Billancourt, France, 8Medical department, Chugai Pharma France, Paris La Defense, France, 9Rheumatology, Rheumatology Department CHR Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic agents, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster III: Efficacy and Safety of Originator Biologics and Biosimilars

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

It has been proven, in a pivotal RCT, that SC TCZ was non-inferior to IV TCZ [1]. However, the effectiveness of the SC TCZ formulation has not been evaluated in “real life”.

The objective was to describe the effectiveness and the characteristics of RA patients switching from IV to SC TCZ formulation in current practice.

Methods:

We analysed all the RA patients of the shared medical file “RIC Nord de France” with at least 1 DAS 3 months before inclusion, treated with TCZ, switching or not from IV to SC TCZ, between April 30th 2015 and January 15th 2016. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients remaining in their DAS28-ESR category remission/LDA or moving to an inferior DAS28-ESR category at 24 weeks (W24). DAS28-ESR was calculated at inclusion and at W24 for switch patients (IV-SC) and for non-switch patients (IV-IV). Permanent discontinuation of TCZ before W24 was considered as failure.

Results:

From the 263 patients included, 30% switched from IV to SC TCZ.

At baseline, there were 77.6% females, mean BMI was 27.46±6.40, and mean RA duration was 15.11±9.38 years in the whole population. Mean IV TCZ duration before inclusion was 35.2±24.3 months in switch and 24.7±22.1 months in non-switch patients. 51.1% of the switch patients were treated in monotherapy, 49.1% in the non-switch group. Mean DAS28-ESR were 2.23±1.16 in the switch and 3.07±1.70 in the non-switch patients. 79.3% of the switch patients were in DAS28-ESR category remission or LDA, and 20.7% in MDA. 53.8% of the non-switch patients were in DAS28-ESR category remission or LDA, 33.3% in MDA, and 12.9% in HDA.

At W24, 73.9% (CI 95% =[63.4% – 82.7%]) of the switch patients, and 72% (CI95% =[64.4% – 78.8%]) of the non-switch patients stayed in DAS28-ESR category remission/LDA or move to an inferior DAS28-ESR category (Table).

Table: DAS28-ESR at W24

Switch
N=92

No switch
N=171

All
N=263

Primary criterion: patients moving to a fewer DAS28 category (or staying in the category LDA/remission) with imputation *

N

88

161

249

Missing

4

10

14

No

23 (26.1%)
[ 17.3% – 36.6%]

45 (28.0%)
[ 21.2% – 35.6%]

68 (27.3%)
[ 21.9% – 33.3%]

Yes

65 (73.9%)
[ 63.4% – 82.7%]

116 (72.0%)
[ 64.4% – 78.8%]

181 (72.7%)
[ 66.7% – 78.1%]

*Permanent discontinuation of treatment was considered as failure

Conclusion:

In that “real life” population, the proportion of RA patients treated with TCZ in remission or LDA remains similar at W24 for switch patients (IV-SC) and for non-switch patients (IV-IV). Proportions of patients moving to an inferior DAS category were also comparable in both groups. Switch patients appear to have less active disease at baseline. Factors associated to switch will be investigated.

Reference:

1. Burmester GR, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):69-74.


Disclosure: J. Darloy, None; R. M. Flipo, Roche SAS, 5,Chugai Pharma France, 5; N. Segaud, None; J. P. Eschard, None; V. Goeb, Roche SAS, 5,Chugai Pharma France, 5; J. H. Salmon, None; E. Houvenagel, Roche SAS, 5; C. Chopin, None; S. Gally, Roche SAS, 3; D. Pau, Roche SAS, 3; I. Idier, Chugai Pharma France, 3; G. Baudens, Roche SAS, 5,Chugai Pharma France, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Darloy J, Flipo RM, Segaud N, Eschard JP, Goeb V, Salmon JH, Houvenagel E, Chopin C, Gally S, Pau D, Idier I, Baudens G. Similar Effectiveness of Both Formulations of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Switching from Intravenous (IV) to Subcutaneous (SC) at 6 Months in Real Life [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/similar-effectiveness-of-both-formulations-of-tocilizumab-tcz-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-switching-from-intravenous-iv-to-subcutaneous-sc-at-6-months-in-real-life/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/similar-effectiveness-of-both-formulations-of-tocilizumab-tcz-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-switching-from-intravenous-iv-to-subcutaneous-sc-at-6-months-in-real-life/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology