ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 646

Sicca Syndrome in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Is It a Real Sjögren’s?

George Fragoulis1, James Reilly1, Shauna Kerr1, Iain. B. McInnes1 and Haralampos M. Moutsopoulos2, 1Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medicine, Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2Department of Pathophysiology, Medical School of Athens, Department of Pathophysiology, Athens, Greece

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: biopsies, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and salivary gland, Sjogren's syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Sjögren's Syndrome Poster I: Clinical Insights into Sjögren's Syndrome

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The histopathological hallmark and a major diagnostic criterion of Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) is the presence of periductal lymphocytic infiltrates in the labial minor salivary glands (LMSG). SS can occur either as an entity alone (primary SS-pSS) or with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune diseases. Sicca symptoms (primarily ocular) are observed in around 20-25% of RA patients.  The present study examines the LMSG infiltrates in sicca-RA patients and compares their composition with this described in pSS.

Methods: 100 consecutive RA patients (2010 ACR criteria) answer a validated sicca symptoms questionnaire. Positive responders were evaluated for ocular and oral dryness including a LMSG biopsy. All samples in addition to haematoxylin and eosin were stained for the immunocyte populations in serial sections [CD3: total T cells, CD4 and CD8: T cell subpopulations, CD20: B cells, CD68: macrophages (ΜΦ), S100 and fascin: interdigitating and follicular dendritic cells (DC)]. Stained cells and total mononuclear cells (MNC) were counted in the entire section. Counts were expressed as cell incidence (percentage of cell type number/total infiltrating MNC number).

Results:

44/100 RA patients responded positively for sicca symptoms. Their anthropometric and clinicoserologic characteristics are shown in Table 1. In total, 30 out of 100 RA patients had LMSG with a focus score ≥ 1. The immune cell composition in LMSG was found to differ from that of pSS [1] (Table 2): The incidence of DC and MΦ was higher, T cells were increased in severe lesions (ANOVA test, p=0.03) and DCs were inverse correlated with lesion severity (S100: p= 0.0004, r=-0.56; fascin: p=0.08, r=-0.29). In sicca-RA patients, MΦ and DC incidence correlated positively with the patients’ RA score (ACR criteria) (CD68: p<0.0001, r=0.65; S100: p=0.01, r=0.41; fascin: p=0.07, r=0.31) and was higher in those who had biopsy focus score<1 and were anti-Ro negative [MΦ (p=0.02) and DC (S100: p=0.002; fascin: p=0.001)].

Conclusion:

The cell composition of the LMSG infiltrates of sicca-RA patients is different compared to that seen in biopsies of pSS patients. These differences, coupled with the known genetic and serologic dissimilarities may further attest for diverse pathophysiologic process operating in the genesis of these two entities.

References

  1. Characteristics of the minor salivary gland infiltrates in Sjögren’s syndrome. Christodoulou MI, Kapsogeorgou EK, Moutsopoulos HM. J Autoimmun. 2010 34(4):400-7

Table 1. a. ACR 2010 RA criteria, at the time of diagnosis.

Patients characteristics

N=44

Epidemiological

 

Age, median (range)

57.2 (32-71)

Sex (m/f)

2/42

Total follow up (months); median (range)

80 (6-264)

RA precedes/coincide/SS precedes No (%)

20/20/4 (45.5/45.5/9)

Evolution time RA to SS (months); (mean ± SD)

89.8 ± 79.1

Criteria

 

Ocular dryness (subjective), No (%)

38 (86.4)

Oral dryness (subjective), No (%)

24 (54.5)

Rose Bengal (positive), No (%)

27 (61.4)

Schirmer’s test (positive), No (%)

28 (63.6)

Unstimulated salivary flow, No (%)

23 (52.3)

Biopsy Tarpley score, median (range)

1 (0-4)

Biopsy Focus score, median (range)

0.96 (0-12)

RA criteria scorea median (range)

7 (6-10)

Laboratory

 

Anemia, No (%)

14 (31.8)

Thrombopenia, No (%)

3 (6.8)

Leukopenia, No (%)

1 (2.3)

ANA positive, No (%)

34 (77.3)

RF positive, No (%)

34 (77.3)

Anti-CCP positive, No (%)

23 (52.3)

Anti-Ro/SSA positive, No (%)

15 (34.1)

Anti-La/SSB positive, No (%)

2 (4.5)

C3 (mg/dl), mean ± SD

112.7 ± 24.5

C4 (mg/dl), mean ± SD

22.6 ± 7.0

Clinical

 

Fatigue, No (%)

10 (22.7)

Fever, No (%)

11 (25.0)

Raynaud’s phenomenon, No (%)

14 (31.8)

Morning stiffness, No (%)

33 (75.0)

Renal/Lung/Liver involvement, No (%)

8 (18.2)

Serositis, No (%)

3 (6.8)

Myositis, No (%)

1 (2.3)

Peripheral nerve involvement, No (%)

5 (11.4)

Purpura, No (%)

8 (18.2)

Salivary Gland Enlargement, No (%)

5 (11.4)

Lymphoma, No (%)

2 (4.5)

Table 2.  MSG biopsy lesion composition in RA patients with sicca compared to primary SS patients [1]

 

Percentage or ratio

Correlation with MSG lesion severity (No  Infiltrates/4mm2)

Primary SS [1]

RA with sicca

Primary SS [1]

RA with sicca

      %CD20

44.19   ±  1.8

42.9  ±  1.92

r = 0.50

p= 0.001

r= 0.131

p= 0.452

%CD3

48.07  ±  1.8

44.4  ±  1.57

r= – 0.65,

p < 0.0001

r= 0.191

p= 0.281

%CD4

32.94  ±  1.9

26.4  ±  1.7

r= – 0.58

p = 0.0003

           r= 0.231

p= 0.181

%CD8

15.42 ±  1.0

17.4  ±  1.16

r= – 0.41

p <0.0001

 r= – 0.256

           p= 0.133

%CD68 MΦ

4.48 ± 0.67

5.69 ± 0.48

r= 0.46

p= 0.005

 r= – 0.278

           p= 0.105

%S100 DC

0.70 ± 0.10

1.89 ± 0.24

r= – 0.40

p = 0.015

  r= – 0.565

  p= 0.0004

%Fascin DC

1.89  ±  0.22

3.96 ± 0.36

NS

 r= – 0.294

           p= 0.08

%CD3/%CD20

1.26 ± 0.12

1.15 ± 0.08

r= – 0.59

p <0.001

 r= – 0.046

           p= 0.794

%CD4/%CD8

2.56  ± 0.29

2.02  ± 0.31

r= – 0.41

p= 0.015

r= 0.285

           p= 0.09


Disclosure: G. Fragoulis, None; J. Reilly, None; S. Kerr, None; I. B. McInnes, None; H. M. Moutsopoulos, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fragoulis G, Reilly J, Kerr S, McInnes IB, Moutsopoulos HM. Sicca Syndrome in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Is It a Real Sjögren’s? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sicca-syndrome-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-is-it-a-real-sjgrens/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sicca-syndrome-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-is-it-a-real-sjgrens/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology