ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2477

Short Term Clinical Response to Initial Treatment with High Versus Low Dose Methotrexate in Mono- and Combination Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

SA Bergstra1, CF Allaart1, R van den Berg1, A Chopra2, N Govind3, MJ Santos4, TWJ Huizinga5 and RBM Landewé6,7, 1Department of Rheumatology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Pune, India, Pune, India, 3Department of Rheumatology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa, 4Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, Almada, Portugal, 5Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands, 6Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 7Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: combination therapies, DMARDs, glucocorticoids, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster III: Treatment – Monitoring, Outcomes, Adverse Events

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Aiming at rapid decrease of disease activity, there has been a trend to start with higher doses of methotrexate (MTX) for newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, not only for MTX monotherapy, but also in combination with other antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). We hypothesized that in combination with other very effective medication,  there might be no additional benefit of high over low doses of MTX. We studied the relationship with early clinical response of high versus low doses of MTX in mono- and combination therapy in DMARD naive early RA patients.

Methods: RA patients included in the observational international METEOR cohort with symptom duration ≤5 years, time between diagnosis and first visit ≤2 months, MTX prescribed at first visit, no medication change within 3 to 6 months and available disease activity information were selected. Patients were divided into 4 medication groups: MTX monotherapy, MTX + synthetic (cs)DMARDs,  MTX + oral glucocorticoid (+ possibly csDMARDs) or MTX + biologic (b)DMARDs (+ possibly csDMARDs). Missing data were imputed using multivariate normal imputation. MTX dose was dichotomized: low dose ≤10 mg/week & high dose ≥15 mg/week. A propensity score (PS) was calculated to adjust the relationship between MTX doses and outcome for potential confounding by indication. Linear mixed model analyses for DAS, DAS28, and HAQ were performed for each medication group, with ‘MTX-dose’ & ‘days between visit and baseline assessment (time)’ as co-variates. Associations were adjusted for the PS. Random intercept and slope were used to account for irregular time intervals between visits. Each model was tested for the presence of an interaction between ‘MTX dose’ and ‘time’.

Results: Patients on MTX monotherapy had lower baseline disease activity and fewer were erosive and autoantibody positive; other baseline characteristics were comparable between medication groups. The number of patients on combination therapy with bDMARDs was too small to perform analyses (n visits=26, n patients=11). For patients on MTX monotherapy, no differences in efficacy between high and low MTX dose were seen for DAS28 and HAQ. Only DAS decreased slightly less in the high dose initial MTX compared to the low dose group (β=0.0021, 95% CI=0.00012; 0.0041) for interaction between MTX dose and time).  No differences in clinical response between high or low dose MTX were seen in patients on combination therapy with csDMARDs or glucocorticoids (table 1).

Conclusion: In DMARD naive early RA patients, there seems to be no early clinical benefit of high over low initial MTX doses, neither for MTX monotherapy nor for combination therapy with MTX/csDMARDs or glucocorticoids. Contrary to expectations, DAS (but not DAS28 or HAQ) even appeared to decrease slightly less after higher doses of MTX monotherapy. However, this effect was very small and may be explained by unmeasured baseline differences between high and low MTX dose groups not captured by the PS.    


Disclosure: S. Bergstra, None; C. Allaart, None; R. van den Berg, None; A. Chopra, None; N. Govind, None; M. Santos, None; T. Huizinga, None; R. Landewé, Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Novartis, Pfizer, Rhoche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth., 2,Robert Landewé is director of Rheumatology Consultancy BV, which is a registered company under Dutch law., 4,Abbott/AbbVie, Ablynx, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen (formerly Centocor), Galapagos, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Rhoche, Schering-Plough, TiGenix, UCB, Wyeth., 5,Abbott/AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen (formerly Centocor), Merck, Pfizer, Rhoche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth., 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bergstra S, Allaart C, van den Berg R, Chopra A, Govind N, Santos M, Huizinga T, Landewé R. Short Term Clinical Response to Initial Treatment with High Versus Low Dose Methotrexate in Mono- and Combination Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/short-term-clinical-response-to-initial-treatment-with-high-versus-low-dose-methotrexate-in-mono-and-combination-therapy-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/short-term-clinical-response-to-initial-treatment-with-high-versus-low-dose-methotrexate-in-mono-and-combination-therapy-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology