ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1225

Serum Uric Acid Testing Practices over Five Years Among Incident Gout Cases

Dena H. Jaffe1, Arriel Benis2, Natalia M. Flores3, Hagit Gabay2, Robert Morlock4, Alyssa Klein5, Dana Y Teltsch6, Jonathan Chapnick7, Becca Feldman2, Yair Molad8, Shmuel M Giveon9 and Maya Leventer-Roberts2, 1Health Outcomes Research, Kantar Health, Jerusalem, Israel, 2Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel, 3Kantar Health, Foster City, CA, 44939 Directors Place, Ardea Biosciences, Inc., San Diego, CA, 5AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 6Evidera, Lexington, MA, 7Kantar Health, Horsham, PA, 8Rheumatology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson, Petah Tikva, Israel, 9Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: EHR best practices, Gout and uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Health Services Research - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Gout is a chronic inflammatory disorder associated with elevated levels of serum uric acid (sUA), resulting in urate crystal deposits in soft tissues. Uncontrolled gout can result in bone erosion, joint destruction, kidney stones, uric acid nephropathy, and other organ damage. Gout is treatable with medication and lifestyle change. Long-term sUA monitoring is needed to confirm that patients are achieving target levels (≤6 mg/dL, or <5 mg/dL in more severe cases). The study objective is to describe incident cases of gout and characterize these patients by sUA testing during the subsequent 5 consecutive years.

Methods:  Data from Clalit Health Services were used to identify incident cases of gout (1/1/2003-31/12/2009) among members ≥25 years old with continuous enrollment in Clalit for 1 year prior to and 5 years subsequent to diagnosis (index date). Cases were identified based on the following criteria: a) 1 diagnosis of gout from a hospital or specialist visit; or b) ≥2 diagnoses of gout from a general practitioner (GP) visit and either elevated sUA (>6 mg/dL) or a purchase of colchicine or allopurinol. Cases were excluded if a member was concurrently diagnosed with a disease known to affect sUA (eg, renal insufficiency, cancer, Familial Mediterranean Fever). sUA testing practices during the 5-year follow-up period were defined as: full (≥1 test per year), moderate (≥1 test per year for 3 or 4 years), low (≥1 test per year for 1 or 2 years) and no testing (no tests performed). Demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, concurrent medications, and healthcare utilization were examined and stratified by testing practices. Chi-square tests were used to test for differences between groups.

Results:  We identified 15,598 incident gout cases meeting the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 59.3±14.5 years, 79.7% were male, and 35.7% were of higher socioeconomic status. Patients’ clinical history indicated that 15.2% were current smokers and 32.4% were obese. Prevalence of pre-existing comorbidities including CVD, diabetes and hypertension was 26.8%, 20.8%, and 52.5% respectively, and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 0.9±1.3. The distribution of annual sUA testing over the 5-year follow up in this cohort was: 5,445 (34.9%) patients had full testing, 6,678 (42.8%) had moderate testing, 3,196 (20.5%) had poor testing, and 279 (1.8%) had no testing. At the end of follow-up, 25.6% of patients’ last documented sUA was ≤6 mg/dL. Among patients in the groups with sUA ≤6 or ≥10 mg/dL, close to 39% had full testing, while among those with sUA between 6.1-9.9 mg/dL, full testing ranged from 31.6%-35.7%.

Conclusion:  Consistent with previous findings, gout patients in Clalit were on average older adults, predominately men and with concurrent comorbidities. Over three-quarters of newly diagnosed gout patients performed an annual sUA testing during at least 3 of the 5 years of follow-up. Further study is required to assess the association between regular testing and health outcomes.


Disclosure: D. H. Jaffe, Kantar Health, 3; A. Benis, Clalit Research Institute, 3; N. M. Flores, Kantar Health, 3; H. Gabay, Clalit Research Institute, 3; R. Morlock, Ardea Biosciences Inc, 3; A. Klein, AstraZeneca, 3; D. Y. Teltsch, Evidera, 3; J. Chapnick, Kantar Health, 3; B. Feldman, Clalit Research Institute, 3; Y. Molad, None; S. M. Giveon, None; M. Leventer-Roberts, Clalit Research Institute, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jaffe DH, Benis A, Flores NM, Gabay H, Morlock R, Klein A, Teltsch DY, Chapnick J, Feldman B, Molad Y, Giveon SM, Leventer-Roberts M. Serum Uric Acid Testing Practices over Five Years Among Incident Gout Cases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serum-uric-acid-testing-practices-over-five-years-among-incident-gout-cases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serum-uric-acid-testing-practices-over-five-years-among-incident-gout-cases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology