ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1583

Serositis In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus:  Prevalence, Recurrence, Treatment and Outcome

Mansour Somaily1, Dafna D. Gladman2, Dominique Ibanez2 and Murray B. Urowitz2, 1Medicine, Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects II: Central Nervous System Manifestations, Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Serositis is one of the ACR classification criteria for SLE.  Its incidence is variable in studies varying from 12 to 60%.

The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of serositis, its recurrence, management and complications in a large longitudinal cohort study.

Methods:

Patients studied were seen in a long term single center observational cohort study. Pleurisy and pericarditis were diagnosed according to SLEDAI-2K Disease Activity Index criteria, which require objective measures to classify the serositis.

Demographic and clinical data collected at the time of serositis onset included age, gender, age at diagnosis, disease duration, medication used, damage index and SLEDAI assessment. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) patients with no recurrence and 2) those with recurrence. Those patients who had serositis features for more than six months despite appropriate treatment were considered to have refractory disease.  Recovery was defined as resolution of pain attributed to the serositis. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results:

214 patients out of 1678 patients in the cohort (12.8%), had serositis during their disease course.  This group was made up of 83% Female, 67% Caucasian, 14% Black, 8% Asian and 10% Other. Age at SLE diagnosis was 33 ± 12 years. At onset of serositis, disease duration was 4.6 ± 6.1 years; SLEDAI-2K (excluding serositis items) was 11.3 ± 9.7 and 61 (36%) patients had some damage.

174 patients had no recurrence and 40 patients (18.7%)had recurrence – 31 patients had 2 episodes, 5 patients had 3 episodes and 4 patients had 4 episodes.  12 (0.7%) patients had complications including pleural fibrosis and thickening and pericardial thickening.

202 (94.4%) patients went on to complete recovery and 12 (5.6%) were refractory.  Average time to recovery was 8.6 ± 9.6 weeks. Refractory patients had serositis for an average of 1.2 ± 0.5 year.

Excluding refractory patients and comparing patients with recurrence to those without recurrence, there was no difference in sex, age at SLE diagnosis, age and disease duration at serositis onset, SLEDAI-2K or percent of patients with damage. More patients with recurrences had steroids and immunosuppressives compared to the non-recurrence group (100% vs 89% for steroids p=0.05; 36% vs 11% for immunosuppressives, p=0.0002).

Conclusion:

Serositis occurs in 12.8% of our patients as defined by SLEDAI-2K. They responded well to corticosteroid but approximately 1 in 5 had a recurrence.  Refractory disease is rare.  There were no predictive variables for recurrence.


Disclosure:

M. Somaily,
None;

D. D. Gladman,
None;

D. Ibanez,
None;

M. B. Urowitz,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serositis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-prevalence-recurrence-treatment-and-outcome/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology