ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1221

Serologic Screening for Coccidioidomycosis Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Rheumatic Diseases on Biologic Response Modifiers, Corticosteroids, and Dmards

Shubha Kollampare1, C. Kent Kwoh1,2, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic3, Lili Zhou2,4, Erin L. Ashbeck2 and Dominick Sudano1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 2University of Arizona Arthritis Center, Tucson, AZ, 3Department of Pharmacy, Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, TUCSON, AZ, 4College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic response modifiers, DMARDs, Infection, rheumatic disease and steroids

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Infection-related Rheumatic Disease Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The 2016 Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend serologic screening for coccidioidomycosis (Cocci) prior to initiation of biologic response modifiers (BRMs). Current screening practices for Cocci in endemic communities have not been described. Our objective was to estimate serologic screening rates for Cocci by state, medication class, physician specialty (rheumatologist vs. non-rheumatologist), and by year.

Methods: In a retrospective cohort study using 2011-2015 Medicare claims data (a 5% representative sample), we identified fee-for-service beneficiaries residing in 7 endemic states (Arizona, California, New Mexico, Nevada, Texas, Utah, and Washington), with any of 10 rheumatic/autoimmune diseases (RA, PsA, AS, SLE, ReA, PM/DM, SSc, Psoriasis, IBD). We included beneficiaries with at least one prescription for a BRM, DMARD, and/or CS between 2012-2015 with continuous Parts A and B coverage in the 365 days preceding the prescription date in the analysis. Screening was considered current if the beneficiary had undergone serologic screening 365 days prior to the prescription date. Logistic regression was used to estimate the proportion of prescriptions that were current for serologic screening, by state, medication class, physician specialty, and by year, with 95%CIs. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the serologic screening rate for newly initiated BRMs, defined as no supply of BRMs within the past 365 days. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for prescriptions written by the same provider.

Results: Among 296,987 prescriptions for 19,109 beneficiaries filled across the 7 endemic states, 3,004 had current serologic screening. In Arizona, 10.6% (95%CI: 8.6, 12.9) of all prescriptions (n=19,822) were current for serologic screening, compared to less than 1% in the other 6 states, prompting us to focus on Arizona for remaining analyses. Prescriptions for BRMs, CSs, and DMARDs had current screening for 20.6% (95% CI: 15.2, 27.4), 8.8% (95% CI:7.2, 10.8), and 9.5% (95%CI: 7.6, 11.9), respectively. Screening rates for BRMs increased from 18.7% (95%CI: 11.3, 29.4) in 2012 to 28.5% (95%CI: 20.2, 38.5) in 2015. Rheumatologists and non-Rheumatologists screening practices were similar (Table 1). Screening prior to newly initiated BRMs was 27.8% (95%CI:19.8, 37.6) in a limited sample (n=115).

Conclusion: Serologic screening rates for Cocci among Medicare beneficiaries with rheumatic/autoimmune diseases on BRMs, CSs, and DMARDs was low in the 7 endemic states, with almost no screening outside of Arizona. IDSA guidelines recommend Coccidioides serologic screening prior to initiation of BRMs, though not repeated annual serologic screening. Further, while the IDSA guidelines recognized increased risk of disseminated Cocci with use of CSs, no screening recommendations have been issued.

 


Disclosure: S. Kollampare, None; C. K. Kwoh, None; W. H. Lo-Ciganic, None; L. Zhou, None; E. L. Ashbeck, None; D. Sudano, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kollampare S, Kwoh CK, Lo-Ciganic WH, Zhou L, Ashbeck EL, Sudano D. Serologic Screening for Coccidioidomycosis Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Rheumatic Diseases on Biologic Response Modifiers, Corticosteroids, and Dmards [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serologic-screening-for-coccidioidomycosis-among-medicare-beneficiaries-with-rheumatic-diseases-on-biologic-response-modifiers-corticosteroids-and-dmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/serologic-screening-for-coccidioidomycosis-among-medicare-beneficiaries-with-rheumatic-diseases-on-biologic-response-modifiers-corticosteroids-and-dmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology