ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1715

Sensivity and Specificity of Clinical Criteria to Identify Patients in Ultrasound Remission in Psoriatic Arthritis

Brigitte Michelsen1, Andreas P Diamantopoulos2, Hilde Berner Hammer3, Arthur Kavanaugh4 and Glenn Haugeberg1,5,6, 1Rheumatology, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway, 2Haugesund Rheumatism Hospital, Haugesund, Norway, 3Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, LaJolla, CA, 5Rheumatology, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 6Rheumatology, Martina Hansens Hospital, Gjettum, Norway

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Clinical practice, Psoriatic arthritis, remission and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Comorbidities and Treatment Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To date, although several have been proposed, there are no validated remission criteria in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Validated criteria for minimal disease activity (MDA) in PsA have been established. This study aimed to compare sensivity and specificity of different potential remission criteria to identify patients in remission as defined by musculoskeletal ultrasound (US).

Methods: In this cross sectional study PsA patients were consecutively recruited from an outpatient clinic. All the patients fulfilled the CASPAR criteria for PsA. The following potential remission criteria were assessed: (1) Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) ≤3.3, (2) Composite Psoriasis Disease Activity Index (CPDAI) <2, (3) Psoriatic ArthritiS Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) <2.4  (4) Boolean’s definition of remission modified for PsA, meeting all of the following criteria: 68 tender joints (TJC68) ≤1, 66 swollen joints (SJC66)≤1, Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) ≤1, dactylitis count ≤1, evaluator’s global assessment (EGA) ≤1 (0-10 scale), patient’s global assessment (PGA) ≤1 (0-10 scale), C-reactive protein ≤1mg/dl (5) MDA, meeting 5 of the 7 following criteria: TJC68 ≤1, SJC66 ≤1, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) ≤1, patient’s pain ≤15 (0-100 scale), PGA ≤20 (0-100 scale), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) ≤0.5 and MASES ≤1. US evaluation was performed on 68 joints, 15 tendons and 29 entheses if clinical findings indicating inflammation. Mandatory US evaluation was performed on 34 joints, 15 tendons and 10 entheses. US remission was defined as power Doppler (PD) score=0 in all joints, entheses and tendons. Chi-Square test or Fishers exact test (as appropriate) was used to calculate proportions. The odds ratio (OR) within the 95% confidence interval was calculated using the 2 x 2 table. A value of p<0,05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results: A total of 141 PsA patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 52,4 (10,2) years, mean disease duration 9,5 (6,6) years and 72% were females. Median (range) TJC68 was 6 (0-55), SJC66 0 (0-6), MASES 2 (0-13). Mean (SD) EGA was 14,8 (12,3), PGA 36,3 (24,4), DAPSA 18,3 (14,1), CPDAI 6,2 (2,7) and PASDAS 3,1 (0,4). Overall, US remission was achieved by 70 (49,6%) patients. Sensivity and specificity of clinical criteria to identify patients in US remission are displayed in the table.

 

Sensivity (%)

Specificity (%)

OR (95% CI)

p

MDA (n=32)

30.0

84.3

2.3 (1.0-5.2)

0.048

DAPSA≤3.3 (n=14)

15.7

95.8

4.2 (1.1-15.9)

0.025

CPDAI>2 (n=12)

13.0

95.7

3.4 (0.9-13.0)

0.066

PASDAS<2.4 (n=11)

8.6

93.0

1.2 (0.4-4.3)

0.748

Boolean’s for PsA (n=8)

10.0

98.6

7.8 (0.9-65.0)

0.033

Conclusion: MDA, DAPSA and Boolean’s PsA remission criteria had some utility as regards identifying PsA patients in US remission. Off note, while the specificity of these criteria was good, the sensivity was quite poor.


Disclosure: B. Michelsen, None; A. P. Diamantopoulos, None; H. B. Hammer, None; A. Kavanaugh, None; G. Haugeberg, Pfizer Norway, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Michelsen B, Diamantopoulos AP, Hammer HB, Kavanaugh A, Haugeberg G. Sensivity and Specificity of Clinical Criteria to Identify Patients in Ultrasound Remission in Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sensivity-and-specificity-of-clinical-criteria-to-identify-patients-in-ultrasound-remission-in-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sensivity-and-specificity-of-clinical-criteria-to-identify-patients-in-ultrasound-remission-in-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology