ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1719

Secular Trends in Treatment Patterns for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Joseph F Merola1, Joyce Lii2, Rishi J. Desai3, Daniel H. Solomon4 and Seoyoung C. Kim5, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Medicine, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 5Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy; Pharmacoepidemiologyand Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologic agents, population studies, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster II: Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Psoriasis (Pso) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are complex, multi-system diseases for which an ever-increasing landscape of therapies exists. Little is known about the population level time-trends in use of these agents. We aimed to examine trends in the use of systemic therapy – both conventional and biologic drugs – for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Methods: Using claims data (2004-2013) from a large nationwide US commercial health plan, we selected patients with 1) Pso without PsA and 2) PsA based on 2 diagnosis codes separated by 7-365 days. In each group, we identified 3 hierarchical treatment groups based on their topical or systemic treatment in a 12-month baseline period prior to the 2nd PsA or Pso diagnosis date (i.e., index date): 1) topical or ultraviolet (UV) therapy only, 2) conventional immunomodulating drugs, and 3) biologics. In the Pso and PsA groups, we calculated the proportion of each treatment groups at baseline and the proportion of a specific conventional or biologic immunomodulating agent over time.

Results: We included 49,950 Pso and 9,706 PsA patients. Mean age (SD) was  46.9 (13.3) years for Pso and 48.2 (11.1) years for PsA.  Sixty percent of patients with PsA also had psoriasis. Overall, for baseline treatment of Pso, 82.8% used topical or UV therapy only, 6.8% had conventional immunomodulating drugs and 10.4% used biologic drugs. Baseline treatment of PsA included 18.0% topical or UV therapy only, 32.2% conventional immunomodulating drugs and 49.8% biologic drugs. No substantial time trends were noted in either group. Methotrexate was the most commonly used conventional immunomodulating drug in both Pso (48.7% in 2005 to 61.5% in 2013) and PsA (83.2% in 2005 to 74.2% in 2013) groups. For Pso, etanercept was the most commonly used biologic drug, albeit with a decreasing trend (87.9% to 39.4%), and adalimumab was the 2nd most commonly used drug (2.2% to 28.4%) from 2005 to 2013. Ustekinumab use in Pso has increased from 0.2% in 2009 to 27.7% in 2015 (Figure 1).  Among biologic drug users for PsA, etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab were the three most commonly used agents across all years. Ustekinumab use in PsA has increased from 0.3% in 2009 to 6.5% in 2013 (Figure 2).

Conclusion:   Over the past decade, we noted a substantial trend in the patterns of biologic treatment for both Pso and/or PsA. The change in the use of different biologic drugs among patients with Pso has been more pronounced over time compared to PsA, most likely related to the availability of ustekinumab.

Figure 1.  Trend in the use of biologic drugs in psoriasis

        Figure 2. Trend in the use of biologic drugs in psoriatic arthritis

     


Disclosure: J. F. Merola, Biogen Idec, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Janssen, Momenta, Mallinckrodt, 5,Biogen Idec, 2,AbbVie, Eli-Lilly, 8; J. Lii, None; R. J. Desai, None; D. H. Solomon, Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, 2,Lilly, Pfizer, Genentech, 2; S. C. Kim, Pfizer, Lilly, Genentech, AstraZeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Merola JF, Lii J, Desai RJ, Solomon DH, Kim SC. Secular Trends in Treatment Patterns for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/secular-trends-in-treatment-patterns-for-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthritis-a-population-based-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/secular-trends-in-treatment-patterns-for-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthritis-a-population-based-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology