ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 953

Secukinumab, a Human Anti–Interleukin-17A Monoclonal Antibody, Improves Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Inhibits Radiographic Progression: Efficacy and Safety Data from a Phase 3 Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Philip J. Mease1, Iain B. McInnes2, Bruce Kirkham3, Arthur Kavanaugh4, Proton Rahman5, Désirée van der Heijde6, Robert Landewé7, Peter Nash8, Luminita Pricop9, Jiacheng Yuan10, Hanno Richards11 and Shephard Mpofu12, 1Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 3Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, 4UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 5Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF, Canada, 6Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 7Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 8University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 9Integrated Hospital Care (IHC) Franchise, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 10Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 11Clinical Immunology / Dermatology, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 12Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: monoclonal antibodies, Psoriatic arthritis, randomized trials and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis II - Novel Treatments Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Secukinumab has demonstrated significant and rapid efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis in two phase 3 studies. We present the first randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients (pts) with PsA (FUTURE 1; NCT01392326).

Methods

606 adults with active, moderate to severe PsA were randomized to secukinumab or PBO. Pts on secukinumab received 10 mg/kg i.v. loading dose at baseline, Week (Wk) 2 and Wk 4, then either 75 mg s.c. (10 IV→75 SC) or 150 mg s.c. (10 IV→150 SC) every 4 wks from Wk 8. PBO was given on the same schedules. Patients naïve to anti-TNF therapy (~70%) and those intolerant of or inadequate responders to anti-TNF therapy (TNF-IR; ~30%), were stratified across groups. Statistical analyses for the primary and multiple secondary endpoints used non-responder imputation (binary variables), mixed-effects repeated measures model (continuous variables), and linear extrapolation (radiographic data), following a pre-defined hierarchical hypothesis testing strategy to adjust for multiplicity.

Results

Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Both 10 IV→75 SC and 10 IV→150 SC demonstrated significantly higher ACR20 responses vs. PBO at Wk 24 (50.5% and 50.0% vs. 17.3%, respectively; P< 0.0001 vs. PBO). All pre-specified secondary endpoints, including dactylitis, enthesitis, SF36-PCS, HAQ-DI, DAS28-CRP, ACR50, PASI 75, PASI 90, and mTSS score were achieved by Wk 24 and reached statistical significance; active dose separated from PBO as early as Wk 1 for ACR20, DAS28-CRP, and HAQ-DI. Drug exposure levels were similar in the secukinumab groups up to the primary endpoint due to i.v. loading. Improvements in all primary and secondary endpoints were sustained through Wk 52. At Wk 52, ACR 20/50/70 responses, using an observed analysis, were 66.9%, 38.4% and 25.6% for 10 IV→75 SC and 69.5%, 50.0% and 28.2% for 10 IV→150 SC. In both TNF-naïve and TNF-IR groups, secukinumab demonstrated superiority at Wk 24 in ACR20/50/70, PASI 75/90, HAQ-DI, SF36-PCS, dactylitis and enthesitis at both doses and the effect was maintained through Wk 52. Secukinumab significantly inhibited radiographic structural joint damage at Wk 24 vs. PBO. AEs at Wk 16: 60.4% (10 IV→75 SC), 64.9% (10 IV→150 SC) and 58.4% (PBO); non-fatal SAE rates: 2.5%, 4.5% and 5.0%, respectively. Mean, median, and maximum exposures: 438.5, 456.0 and 721 days; AE/non-fatal SAE rates: 78.1%/8.6% and 82.4%/12.9% in pts who received secukinumab 75 mg s.c. or 150 mg s.c., respectively, at any point in the study.

 

Table.  Summary of selected 24-week efficacy results

Week 24 Data

Secukinumab
 
10 mg/kg IV →
75 mg SC

Secukinumab
10 mg/kg IV →
150 mg SC

PBO

ACR20

(% responders)

50.5*

50.0*

17.3

ACR50

(% responders)

30.7*

34.7*

7.4

ACR70

(% responders)

16.8*

18.8*

2.0

DAS28-CRP

(mean change from BL)

Overall (n=606)

–1.67*

–1.62*

–0.77

aDactylitis

(presence of, %)

Overall (n=324)

43.3*

 51.9*

84.5

aEnthesitis

(presence of, %)

Overall (n=372)

51.2*

54.0*

87.2

*P < 0.0001 vs. PBO; aData from pts with dactylitis (n = 324) and enthesitis (n = 372) at baseline.

ACR, American College of Rheumatology response criteria; BL, baseline; DAS28-CRP, Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein; IV, intravenous; pts, patients; SC, subcutaneous

Conclusion

In this first phase 3 trial to evaluate highly selective IL-17A inhibition in pts with PsA, secukinumab provided rapid, clinically significant and sustained improvements in signs and symptoms, and inhibited joint structural damage. Secukinumab was well tolerated through 52 wks.


Disclosure:

P. J. Mease,

Research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Vertex,

2,

Consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene, Covagen, Crescendo, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Vertex,

5,

Speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Crescendo, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and UCB,

8;

I. B. McInnes,

Consulting fees from Novartis, Amgen, Janssen, BMS, Pfizer, UCB, Abbvie, Celgene and Lilly,

5;

B. Kirkham,

Research grants from AbbVie and UCB,

2,

Consulting fees from Novartis, AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, and MSD,

5,

Speakers’ bureau for BMS, MSD, and UCB,

8;

A. Kavanaugh,

Consulting fees from Novartis ,

5;

P. Rahman,

Consulting fees for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche,

5;

D. van der Heijde,

Consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Augurex, BMS, Celgene, Centocor, Chugai, Covagen, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen Biologics, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough, UCB, Vertex. D,

5,

Research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Augurex, BMS, Celgene, Centocor, Chugai, Covagen, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen Biologics, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough, UCB, Vertex. D,

2;

R. Landewé,

Consulting fees from Abbott/AbbVie, Ablynx, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth,

5,

Advisory boards for Abbott/AbbVie, Ablynx, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth,

9,

Research grants from Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth,

2,

Speaker fees: Abbott, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth,

8,

Rheumatology Consultancy BV,

3;

P. Nash,

Research grants from Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, Janssen, and Celgene,

2,

Honoraria for lectures and advice from Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, Janssen, and Celgene,

9;

L. Pricop,

Employee of Novartis ,

3,

Novartis stock,

1;

J. Yuan,

Employee of Novartis ,

3;

H. Richards,

Employee of Novartis ,

3;

S. Mpofu,

Novartis stock ,

1,

Employee of Novartis ,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/secukinumab-a-human-anti-interleukin-17a-monoclonal-antibody-improves-active-psoriatic-arthritis-and-inhibits-radiographic-progression-efficacy-and-safety-data-from-a-phase-3-randomize/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology