ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 307

Screening for Pulmonary Hypertension in the Anti-Synthetase Syndrome; Utility of Four Different Screening Approaches

Helena Andersson1, Ivar Sjaastad2, Thomas Schwartz2, Torhild Garen3, T. Mogens Aalokken4 and Øyvind Molberg1, 1Department of Rheumatology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, Myositis and pulmonary complications

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Muscle Biology, Myositis and Myopathies Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a feared complication of the anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) and has previously been reported to occur in 8% of the patients [1]. Prognosis is currently poor, but may be improved by earlier referral to diagnostic right heart catheterization (RHC) and therapeutic interventions. Data on non-invasive screening approaches for PH in ASS are limited. Here, the aim was to test the utility of four different and complementary PH screening approaches.

Methods:

In September 2011, 68/70 living ASS patients from the Oslo University Hospital ASS cohort were included in a cross-sectional study where pulmonary function tests (PFT), Echocardiography (Echo) and HRCT of the lungs were performed. In addition, medical reports from six dead patients with confirmed PH by RHC were analyzed. Arbitrary cut-off values for PH suspicion were defined as follows; (1) DLCO < 50 % of expected value, (2) a ratio between FVC% and DLCO%  >1.6, (3) Arteria pulmonalis (A Pulm) diameter ≥ 30 mm on lung CT, (4) estimated mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥ 45 mmHg by Echo. HRCT and Echo analysts were blinded to the participant’s clinical status. Chi-Square test was used to evaluate statistical significance, p<0.05.

Results:

Median disease duration for the 68 patients was 71 months (6-362) and 97 % of the patients had been diagnosed with interstitial lung disease. Median DLCO% was 62% (range12-87), median FVC /DLCO ratio was 1.33 (0.53-3.03) and the median estimated mPAP and pulmonary artery diameters were 23 mmHg (0-98) and 29 mm (20-45), respectively. Altogether, 16/74 patients had performed RHC, confirming PH in 11/16 patients.

Values below the arbitrary PH suspicion cut-offs were frequent, most frequent was increased diameter of  A Pulm, seen in 30/72 (42%) patients. Values suspicious of PH in DLCO, FVC/DLCO ratio, and estimated mPAP were seen in 34%, 28% and 17%, respectively. The correlations between the four variables and confirmed/not confirmed PH are seen in Table 1; Significant correlations were seen between all four variables and confirmed PH, most with the diameter of A Pulm.

Table 1;Correlations between different parameters and Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Parameters

Not confirmed  PH

 

Confirmed PH

p-value

A Pulm < 30 mm, n/N(%)

42/62  (68)

0/10  (0)

<0.001

A Pulm > 30 mm, n/N(%)

20/62  (32)

 10/10 (100)

mPAP <45mmHg,n/N(%)

58/62  (94)

2/10  (20)

<0.001

mPAP >45mmHg,n/N(%)

4/62  (6)

8/10  (80)

DLCO ≥ 50%, n/N (%)

45/60  (75)

1/10  (10)

<0.001

DLCO ≤ 50%, n/N (%)

15/60  (25)

9/10  (90)

FVC/DLCO <1.6 n/N (%)

46/60  (77)

4/10  (40)

<0.027

FVC/DLCO >1.6 n/N(%)

14/60  (23)

6/10  (60)

Conclusion:

Although a small number of patients with confirmed PH, this study shows significant correlation between all tested screening-tools for PH and confirmed PH. All patients (N=10) with confirmed PH had a diameter of A Pulm > 30 mm, and 8/10 had a mPAP of > 45mmHg, indicating these two methods as possible screeningtest for PH. Further studies on PH and it’s predictors are most warranted.


Disclosure: H. Andersson, None; I. Sjaastad, None; T. Schwartz, None; T. Garen, None; T. M. Aalokken, None; Molberg, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Andersson H, Sjaastad I, Schwartz T, Garen T, Aalokken TM, Molberg . Screening for Pulmonary Hypertension in the Anti-Synthetase Syndrome; Utility of Four Different Screening Approaches [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/screening-for-pulmonary-hypertension-in-the-anti-synthetase-syndrome-utility-of-four-different-screening-approaches/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/screening-for-pulmonary-hypertension-in-the-anti-synthetase-syndrome-utility-of-four-different-screening-approaches/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology