ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2584

Screening and Diagnostic Modalities For Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review

Heather Gladue1, Nezam I. Altorok2, Whitney Townsend1, Vallerie McLaughlin3 and Dinesh Khanna4, 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 3Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 4Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: diagnosis, pulmonary complications and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) affects patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD), especially systemic sclerosis (SSc) and MCTD. Despite this, there continues to be delay in screening and diagnosis of these patients. We undertook a systematic review to summarize the best evidence for screening and diagnosis of PAH in CTD.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus databases up to June 2012 with an experienced librarian, related to PH and CTD. We only focused on WHO group I PAH and excluded manuscripts that did not rule out interstitial lung disease (WHO group III) or left heart disease (WHO group II), or if the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was not made by RHC.

Results: We started with 2805 titles, 838 abstracts, and included 21 manuscripts. Twelve studies assessed the tricuspid regurgitation velocity (VTR) or equivalent right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) as a threshold for RHC in patients suspected as having PAH. 11 of these studies were in SSc, and one pertained to SLE. The screening threshold for RHC was VTR >2.73 to >3.16 m/s without symptoms or 2.5 to 3.0 m/s with symptoms and resulted in 20-67% of patients having RHC proven PAH (Table). In the SLE study, VTR >3.0 m/s on TTE led to RHC in 3 patients and none had PAH. Three studies looked at pulmonary function tests and various DLCO% predicted cut-offs. These studies suggest that a low DLCO% 45-70% is associated with a 5.6-7.4% development of PAH, and the decline in DLCO% is associated with an increase in the specificity (For 60% cut off, spec= 45%, and for 50% cut off, spec=90%]) for PAH. Five studies looked at NT-ProBNP and a cut-off >209pg/ml has a high sensitivity (90-100%) and a specificity ranging from 45-95%.

Single studies looked at EKG findings, cardiac MRI, Chest X-ray, CT, autoantibodies, laboratory values and physical exam findings.

Screening Modality

Number of Studies

Conclusion

TTE  (TR velocity)

12 (11 SSc, 1SLE)

Studies had various inclusion criterion.

VTR ranges to prompt RHC

  • 2.73-3.16 m/s without PAH-associated symptoms
  • 2.5-3.16 m/s with symptoms

NT- ProBNP

5 studies (2 cohort, 3 case control)

All SSc

Various Cut offs >236pg/ml

sensitivity (45-93%)

specificity (83-100%)  

PFT’s

4 studies ( 3 cohort, 1 case control) All SSc

Decreased DLCO was associated with PAH.

Composite Measures

3 cohort studies

All SSc

  1. DLCO <70.3% and FVC/DLCO ≥1.82 and NT-ProBNP ≥ 209.8pg/ml -100% sensitive and 100% specific.
  2. DLCO/VA<70% and NT-ProBNP >97th percentile for age 75% sensitive and 97% specific.
  3. Cochin RPS score (RPS=0.0001107(age) +0.0207818 (100-FVC) +0.04905 (150-DLCO/alveolar volume). A cut off of 2.73 sensitivity of 89.5 and specificity of 74.1% for PAH

Conclusion: Our systematic review shows that most evidence exists for use of TTE, pulmonary function tests, and NT-ProBNP for screening and diagnosis of PAH in CTD. These data will be used to develop guidelines for screening and diagnosis of PAH in CTD.


Disclosure:

H. Gladue,
None;

N. I. Altorok,
None;

W. Townsend,
None;

V. McLaughlin,

Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, Merck, United Therapeutics.,

5,

Gilead, United Therapeutics,

8,

Actelion, Ikaria, Novartis, and United Therapeutics.,

2;

D. Khanna,

BMS, DIGNA, Roche, Actelion, Gilead, Merck, United Therapeutics,

5,

National Institutes of Health, PHA, scleroderma foundation,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/screening-and-diagnostic-modalities-for-systemic-sclerosis-associated-pulmonary-arterial-hypertension-a-systematic-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology