ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0346

Safety Profiles of Ixekizumab versus Adalimumab: 52-Week Results from a Head-to-Head Comparison in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Philip Mease1, Josef Smolen2, Arthur Kavanaugh3, Peter Nash4, Gaia Gallo5, Soyi Liu-Leage5, Christophe Sapin5 and Mark Genovese6, 1Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA, 4School of Medicine Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 5Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 6Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Ixekizumab (IXE) was shown to be superior to adalimumab (ADA) in achievement of simultaneous improvement of joint and skin disease (American college of Rheumatology [ACR]50 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]100) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs).1 The objective of this study was to compare the safety and tolerability profile of vs ADA in patients with PsA up to 52 weeks of treatment.

Methods: SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551) was an open-label, head-to-head, blinded assessor clinical trial which included patients with active PsA (≥3 tender joint count + ≥3 swollen joint count) and plaque psoriasis (body surface area ≥3%) who were inadequate responders to csDMARD therapy but naïve to biologic DMARDs. Patients were randomized (1:1) to approved dosing of IXE or ADA. Safety events were assessed at each patient visit up to Week 52. Frequencies of adverse events (AEs) were based on the number of patients in the safety population (patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug). Cases of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and cerebro-cardiovascular events were adjudicated by external committees. Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to onset of serious adverse events (SAEs) was performed.

Results: Of the 283 patients randomized to each treatment, 87% (246/283) of patients who received IXE and 84% (237/283) of patients who received ADA, completed 52 weeks of treatment. The frequency of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) was similar between the groups (74% IXE vs 69% ADA), however fewer severe TEAEs were reported in the IXE group (3.2% IXE vs 7.1% ADA) (Table). SAEs were significantly more frequent in the ADA group compared to the IXE group (12% vs 4.2%; p< 0.001), and the time to develop a patient’s first SAE was significantly shorter for ADA versus IXE (p< 0.001; Figure). Discontinuations due to AEs were numerically more frequent in the ADA group versus the IXE group (7.4% vs 4.2%; p=0.15). IXE-treated patients reported more injection-site reactions (ISR) than ADA-treated patients (11% vs. 3.5%; p=0.002). Study withdrawals due to ISR were comparable, and only one injection-site reaction was severe on ADA (Table). There were two IBD cases reported for IXE; one case was confirmed as IBD.

Conclusion: Safety results were consistent with previous trials with IXE and ADA. Compared with IXE, patients with PsA treated with ADA had significantly more serious AEs.

Reference:
      1.  Mease PJ, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(1):123-31.

ᵃPatients with multiple occurrences of the same event are counted under the highest severity. ᵇThe treatment-emergent adverse event ’s relationship to study treatment was judged by the investigator. ᶜMedical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) high-level term. ᵈThis event was adjudicated but it was not a confirmed inflammatory bowel disease. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01 by Fisher’s exact test. ADA=adalimumab, AE=adverse event; IBD=inflammatory bowel disease; IXE=ixekizumab; MACE=major adverse cardiovascular event.

Figure: Time to onset of first SAE. Numbers below x-axis represent patients at risk at each time point. Open circles represent events. p < 0.001 by log rank test. ADA=adalimumab; IXE=ixekizumab; SAE=serious adverse event.


Disclosure: P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5; J. Smolen, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Celltrion, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, 8, Gilead, 5, 8, ILTOO, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Kabi, 5, 8, Novartis-Sandoz, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 5, 8, Samsung, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8; A. Kavanaugh, Eli Lilly and Company, 5; P. Nash, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; G. Gallo, Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 4; S. Liu-Leage, Eli Lilly and Company, 3, 4; C. Sapin, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; M. Genovese, Abbvie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences Inc., 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, EMD Merck Serono, 2, 5, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, RPharm, 2, 5, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, UCB, 5, Amgen, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mease P, Smolen J, Kavanaugh A, Nash P, Gallo G, Liu-Leage S, Sapin C, Genovese M. Safety Profiles of Ixekizumab versus Adalimumab: 52-Week Results from a Head-to-Head Comparison in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-profiles-of-ixekizumab-versus-adalimumab-52-week-results-from-a-head-to-head-comparison-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-profiles-of-ixekizumab-versus-adalimumab-52-week-results-from-a-head-to-head-comparison-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology