ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 470

Safety Profile of Biologic Agents for Rheumatoid Arhtisitis Treatment after the Complication with Methotrexate-Related Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Shuntaro Saito1, Yuko Kaneko1, Katsuya Suzuki1, Michihide Tokuhira2 and Tsutomu Takeuchi1, 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 2Department of Hematology., Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University., Saitama, Japan

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Safety of Biologics and Small Molecules in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) is a rare complication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis(RA) treated with methotrexate(MTX). Although not a few patients experience exacerbation of RA disease activity after withdrawal of MTX, there have been very few reports referring how to treat RA with MTX-LPD. This study is to investigate the safety profile of biologic agents as a RA treatment after the diagnosis of MTX-LPD.

Methods

We retrospectively studied all 32 RA patients regarded as being complicated with MTX-LPD from 2007 to 2013 in our institution. The patients were classified into 2 groups: patients treated with biologic agents after MTX withdrawal (Biologics group) and patients treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) other than MTX or prednisolone (PSL) (non-biologics group). The rates of LPD recurrence after these RA treatments were compared. The recurrence rates were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by log-rank test.

Results

Four patients were excluded because three died before the restart of RA treatment and one needed no treatment, so twenty eight patients were analyzed in this study. Baseline characteristics of 28 patients were following: age,65; Female, 89%;  duration of MTX administration, 7.5 years; RA disease duration,14.1years; disease activity score (DAS) 28, 2.95. Of 28 patients, 22 patients were pathologically diagnosed as LPD, and 10 were highly suspected of LPD with imaging tests. Seven patients were treated of LPD with chemotherapy prior to restart of RA therapy. 17 Patients were treated with biologic agents and the drugs used were following; tocilizumab (TCZ) in 9 patients, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in 6, abatacept in 1, rituximab in 1. Eleven patients were treated with PSL and/or csDMARDs; PSL alone in 5, salazosulfapyridin (SASP) in 3, bucillamin in 2, tacrolimus (Tac) in 1 patient. LPD relapsed in 2 patients in biologics group, and in 1 in non-biologics group. No significant difference in recurrence rates between the two groups analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-rank test (Figure, p=0.84).

Among 7 patients who had been treated with chemotherapy before the RA disease activity exacerbation, 3 were treated with biologics and 4 with non-biologic; PSL alone in 2, SASP in 1, Tac in 1. No LPD recurrence was observed in these 7 patients in follow up duration (mean 33 months).

Additional analysis with 22 patients that were pathologically diagnosed of LPD showed similar results.

Conclusion

Biologics agents did not increase LPD recurrence compared to csDMARD, and could be the choice of RA treatment in post-MTX-LPD.

<Figure>Recurrence free RA treatment period [months]

 


Disclosure:

S. Saito,
None;

Y. Kaneko,
None;

K. Suzuki,
None;

M. Tokuhira,
None;

T. Takeuchi,

Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma, Bristol–Myers K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Sanofi–Aventis K.K., Santen Pharmaceutica,

2,

Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Bristol–Myers K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co,. Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma, Diaichi Sankyo Co.,Ltd.,

8,

Astra Zeneca K.K., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Novartis Pharma K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Asahi Kasei Medical K.K., Abbivie GK, Daiichi Sankyo Co.,Ltd.,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-profile-of-biologic-agents-for-rheumatoid-arhtisitis-treatment-after-the-complication-with-methotrexate-related-lymphoproliferative-disorder/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology