ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1450

Safety Of Resuming The Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists Therapy In Patients Who Developed Tuberculosis After Use Of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists

Seokchan Hong1, You Jae Kim2, Bon San Koo2, Kyung joo Ahn3, Wook Jang Seo4, Yong-Gil Kim2, Chang-Keun Lee2 and Bin Yoo2, 1Department of rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, 3KEPCO medical center, Seoul, South Korea, 4Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Anti-TNF therapy and tuberculosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Tuberculosis is one of the most serious adverse events related to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in inflammatory diseases. However, there is no consensus on the current treatment guidelines about resuming TNF blockers after development of active tuberculosis infection (TI). Our objective was to analyze the optimal time-point for resuming the TNF antagonist with no relapse of TI.

Methods: Retrospective study has included 683 patients from June 2003 to December 2012 (362 ankylosing spondylitis; 307 rheumatoid arthritis; 10 psoriatic arthritis; 4 Behcet’s disease), who have started TNF blockers at a single tertiary hospital. Data on cases of active TI during biologics were collected and the outcomes of resuming TNF blockers were evaluated.

Results: Of the 683 patients, 15 (2.1%) patients (6 female, mean age 47.4 ± 17.5 years) were diagnosed with active tuberculosis during anti-TNF treatment. Diagnoses were: 10 ankylosing spondylitis; 4 rheumatoid arthritis; 1 Behcet’s disease. Tuberculosis was detected in one patient by routine CXR and in others by the development of symptoms such as fever. The type of tuberculosis infection was: pulmonary in 7 patients; gastrointestinal in 3; lymph nodes in 2; disseminated in 1, miliary in 1, pericardium in 1. The TNF blocker used at TI diagnoses was; 4 etanercept, 4 adalimumab, and 7 infliximab. The mean duration of anti-TNF treatment before development of TB was 26.7± 28.1 months. Anti-TNF treatment was reinitiated in 6 (40%) patients; 4 patients during under treatment of TI treatment (mean TI treatment of 1.5 ± 1.0 months) and 2 patients after completion of TI treatment. Four patients reinitiated with the same agents, whereas 2 patients started with another TNF blocker. All six patients successfully completed anti-tuberculosis treatment and showed good responses. The outcomes in patients after reinitiation of anti-TNF treatment were favorable that no patients had a relapse of TI after a mean follow-up duration of 28 ± 18.1 months.

Conclusion: Active tuberculosis infection in relation to TNF antagonist may be safe for resuming the therapy even before completion of TI treatment. Our results may suggest that it is possible to restart TNF blockers if patients were treated concomitantly with adequate anti-tuberculosis treatment.


Disclosure:

S. Hong,
None;

Y. J. Kim,
None;

B. S. Koo,
None;

K. J. Ahn,
None;

W. J. Seo,
None;

Y. G. Kim,
None;

C. K. Lee,
None;

B. Yoo,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-of-resuming-the-tumor-necrosis-factor-antagonists-therapy-in-patients-who-developed-tuberculosis-after-use-of-tumor-necrosis-factor-antagonists/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology