ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 742

Safety Of Remission Induction With Rituximab Versus Cyclosphosphamide In Patients 65 and Older With Severe ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Eli Miloslavsky1, Ulrich Specks2, Peter A Merkel3, Philip Seo4, Robert F. Spiera5, Carol A. Langford6, Gary S. Hoffman7, Cees G.M. Kallenberg8, E. William St. Clair9, Nadia Tchao10, Linna Ding11, David Ikle12, Brett Jepson12, Paul Brunetta13 and John H. Stone14, 1Division of Rheumatology, Massachusetts General Hopsital, Boston, MA, 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 3Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania and VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 4Rheumatology Division, Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 5Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 6Center for Vasculitis Care and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 7Center for Vasculitis Care and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 8Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 9Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 10Immune Tolerance Network, Bethesda, MD, 11NIAID, Bethesda, MD, 12Rho, Chapel Hill, NC, 13Biotherapeutics, Genentech, So San Francisco, CA, 14Rheumatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adverse events, cyclophosphamide, Rituximab, treatment and vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Vasculitis I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Retrospective studies have demonstrated that patients of advanced age with systemic vasculitis experience a higher mortality and adverse events than their younger counterparts. However, no study has prospectively examined the safety of remission induction treatment of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) or Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA) in patients of advanced age. We analyzed the results of the Rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) (RAVE) trial in order to evaluate adverse events (AEs) and mortality in patients ≥ 65 years old.

 

Methods:

Randomized controlled trial comparing rituximab (RTX, n=99) to cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA, n=98) for remission induction in patients with GPA or MPA.  Glucocorticoids were tapered over 5 months. Subjects were followed for 18 months.

Results:

55 patients were ≥ 65 years old (36 RTX, 19 CYC/AZA) and 142 patients were < 65 years old (63 RTX, 79 CYC/AZA). Baseline characteristics of both groups are reported in the table.  Treatment regimens achieved similar efficacy in both age groups.

While total adverse events were similar between both age groups, patients ≥ 65 had more severe AEs (Grade ≥ 3) than those < 65 (Table). Severe cytopenias occurred more frequently in older patients. All four deaths during the study period occurred in patients ≥ 65 (2 RTX, 2 CYC/AZA).


 

Comparing the two treatment arms among patients 65 and older, frequencies of total AEs or severe AEs were similar between the RTX and CYC/AZA groups (11.52/patient year RTX vs 11.44/patient year CYC/AZA; 1.15/patient year (95% CI 0.87-1.50) RTX vs 0.85/patient year (0.52-1.31) CYC/AZA, respectively).  Similarly, the frequency of severe cytopenias and severe infections were comparable between the two groups (0.24 (95% CI 0.13-0.42)/patient year RTX vs 0.21 (95% CI 0.07-0.49)/patient year CYC/AZA; 0.22 (95% CI 0.11-0.40)/patient year RTX vs 0.17 (95% CI 0.05-0.43)/patient year CYC/AZA), respectively.

Conclusion:

Patients ≥ 65 undergoing remission induction treatment for GPA or MPA may experience more severe adverse events than their younger counterparts, including more frequent severe cytopenias.  Both RTX and CYC/AZA-based regimens have a similar adverse event profile in patients ≥ 65 years old.

 


Disclosure:

E. Miloslavsky,

Genentech Inc,

9;

U. Specks,
None;

P. A. Merkel,
None;

P. Seo,
None;

R. F. Spiera,

Roche Pharmaceuticals, g,

2;

C. A. Langford,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

9,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

9;

G. S. Hoffman,
None;

C. G. M. Kallenberg,

Roche,

8;

E. W. St. Clair,

Biogen Idec,

9,

Up-to-Date,

7;

N. Tchao,
None;

L. Ding,
None;

D. Ikle,

Rho,

3;

B. Jepson,

Rho,

3;

P. Brunetta,

Genentech Inc,

3;

J. H. Stone,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-of-remission-induction-with-rituximab-versus-cyclosphosphamide-in-patients-65-and-older-with-severe-anca-associated-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology