ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2187

Safety of Minor Labial Salivary Gland Biopsy

ŽIga Rotar, Alojzija Hočevar, NatašA. Gašperšič, Branka Hostnik, Anita Antolić and Matija Tomšič, Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Sjogren's syndrome and diagnosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Sjögren's Syndrome - Clinical

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Histopathological analysis of minor salivary glands is a part of the latest classification criteria for SS proposed by the American-European Consensus Group (AECG), and the ACR.1, 2 Recently it has been proposed that the presence of germinal center like structures in diagnostic minor salivary gland biopsies may be a highly predictive marker for NHL development in primary SS.3 Our aim was to prospectively evaluate adverse events of minor salivary gland biopsy performed by rheumatologists in patients suspect of having Sjögren’s syndrome.

Methods:

At our rheumatology department we run a weekly diagnostic outpatient clinic where we see patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of Sjögren’s syndrome referred to us by their rheumatologists. We evaluate them using the AECG criteria. In consenting patients who cannot be classified on the basis of history, clinical tests, and serological tests we perform the minor salivary gland biopsy.

Under aseptic conditions an assistant exposes mucosa of the lower lip. We clean it with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate solution, and infiltrate the lateral third of the lip with approx. 0.5–1 cm3 of 2% lidocaine near one of the many orifices of the minor salivary gland excretory ducts identified by observation of nascent droplets of saliva. The rheumatologist makes an approx. 5 mm linear incision of the mucosa, removes all the exposed glands using a forceps, and places a single suture to close the wound using 4-0 absorbable braided polyglycolic acid. Removed glands are transported to pathology laboratory in 10% formalin.

Before the biopsy we informed each patient orally and in writing about possible adverse events and appropriate responses. Ten days to two weeks following the biopsy, a nurse phoned each patient to inquire about the pain (0-10 scale, VAS) during biopsy, and in the week following it; the survival of sutures, and whether the patient’s GP or dentist had to remove them; and any other adverse events experienced by the patient.

Results:

From 02/01/2007 to 12/15/2010 350 patients were referred for biopsy (89.7% females, average age 56.9±12.5 years). Incision length was measured and was on average 5.0±0.8 mm. The average volume of the obtained tissue sample was 26.5±72.8 mm3.

322 patients responded to the follow up call by the nurse. During the biopsy 89.8%, 5.3%, and 1.5% reported pain on VAS of 0, 1–3, and 4–5, respectively, while 3.4% provided no answer. In the week following the biopsy 78.9%, 12.4%, 2.8%, 1.9%, 0.9% scored their pain on VAS 0, 1–3, 4, 5, and 6–8, respectively, while 3.1% provided no answer. 80.1% of patients report no adverse events, the rest complained about paresthesia, wound suppuration, hematoma, irritating mucosal scar, and lower lip swelling in 5.6%, 5%, 3.4%, 3.4%, and 2.5%, respectively. All the adverse events were transient and have resolved within the first three days after biopsy in 95.5% of patients.

The average suture survival was 3.7±2.1 days. In 15.5% of patients sutures were removed by their GP or dentist after on average 4.8±2.3 days.

Conclusion:

Minor salivary gland biopsy is a safe outpatient procedure in the hands of rheumatologists.


Disclosure:

Rotar,
None;

A. Hočevar,
None;

N. Gašperšič,
None;

B. Hostnik,
None;

A. Antolić,
None;

M. Tomšič,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-of-minor-labial-salivary-gland-biopsy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology