ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2042

Safety and Effectiveness of the Use of Combined Therapy with bDMARDS and tsDMARDs in Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases

Natalia Lopez Juanes1, Carlota Ureta1, Marta Novella-Navarro1, Irene Monjo Henry1, Diana Peiteado1, Alejandro Villalba1, Laura Nuño2, Victoria Navarro-Compan3, María Sanz1, Mª ángeles Gonzalez1, Cristina Suarez4, Agustin Remesal1, Rosa Alcobendas5, Clara udaondo1, Elena Sendagorta5, Alejandro Balsa1, Eugenio de Miguel1 and Chamaida Plasencia-Rodríguez1, 1Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain, 3Department of Rheumatology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain, 4Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 5La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Therapy, alternative

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2015–2051) Miscellaneous Rheumatic & Inflammatory Diseases Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The combination of biological (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) has emerged as a promising approach to improve clinical outcomes in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), particularly in refractory or complex cases where simultaneous targeting of multiple inflammatory pathways may be beneficial. However, this strategy raises concerns regarding safety, adverse events, and optimal drug selection. The objectives of this study are to describe the clinical characteristics of IMID patients receiving dual targeted therapy (DTT) with two bDMARDs or a bDMARD plus a tsDMARD, to identify the most commonly used combinations and main adverse events and to evaluate clinical response to DTT.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study including IMID patients treated with bDMARD and/or tsDMARD combinations at Hospital Universitario La Paz from October 2019 to December 2024. We collected clinical data, details of DTT combinations, treatment duration, reasons for discontinuation, and disease activity assessed by DAS28, ASDAS, and DAPSA at baseline and at discontinuation or end of follow-up.

Results: Nineteen patients with 28 DTT cycles were included; 68.4% were women, with a mean age at DTT initiation of 42.9±19.4 years. Diagnoses included spondyloarthritis (SpA, 36.8%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, 21.1%), psoriatic arthritis (PsA, 15.8%), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA, 10.5%), polyarthritis of possible genetic cause (10.5%), and Behçet syndrome (5.3%). A second IMID treated with bDMARD/tsDMARD was associated in 57.9% of patients: 63.3% with bowel disease (IBM), 27.3% with psoriasis, 18.2% with chronic urticaria and 9.1% with chronic angioedema. Extra-musculoskeletal manifestations were present in 21.2%: 1 case of interstitial lung disease, 1 sicca syndrome, 2 uveitis and 1 with neurological involvement. Patients had received a median of five prior DMARDs. Thirteen patients (68.4%) had a single DTT cycle, while six (31.6%) had ≥1 prior DTT cycles. The main indications for DTT initiation were active musculoskeletal disease (63%), active IBD (11.1%), combined active MSK/IBD disease (7.4%), and psoriasis (7.4%). Most frequently used combinations were TNF inhibitor (TNFi)+JAK inhibitor (JAKi, 32.1%), TNFi+vedolizumab (25.0%), and TNFi+anti-IL23 (10.7%). Median DTT duration was 10.3 months (range 0.7–60.3 months). The most common adverse events were infections (25.0%) and hypertransaminasemia (10.7%). Discontinuation occurred in 57.1% of DTT cycles, mainly due to inefficacy (31.1%) and infections (7.1%). At the end of the study, 57.9% of patients maintained TDD and clinical improvement was observed in 52.6%, as assessed by disease activity indices and clinical reports (see Table 1).

Conclusion: DTT appears to be a viable option for refractory IMID patients, achieving clinical improvement in over half of the cases. Nonetheless, the high rate of adverse events and treatment discontinuation underscores the importance of careful patient selection and close monitoring. Further research is needed to refine patient selection, optimize drug combinations, and improve risk management strategies.

Supporting image 1Clinical characteristics, DTTs used, duration of treatment, reason for discontinuation and disease activity and status at baseline (beginning of most recent DTT) and at discontinuation of treatment or at the end of the study of the included patients.


Disclosures: N. Lopez Juanes: None; C. Ureta: None; M. Novella-Navarro: None; I. Monjo Henry: None; D. Peiteado: None; A. Villalba: None; L. Nuño: None; V. Navarro-Compan: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Alfasigma, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Lilly, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; M. Sanz: None; M. Gonzalez: None; C. Suarez: None; A. Remesal: None; R. Alcobendas: None; C. udaondo: None; E. Sendagorta: None; A. Balsa: None; E. de Miguel: AbbVie, 1, 5, 6, BMS, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 6, Grunenthal, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, MSD, 6, Novartis, 1, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 5, 6, Roche, 5, 6, Sanofi, 6, UCB, 6; C. Plasencia-Rodríguez: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, UCB, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lopez Juanes N, Ureta C, Novella-Navarro M, Monjo Henry I, Peiteado D, Villalba A, Nuño L, Navarro-Compan V, Sanz M, Gonzalez M, Suarez C, Remesal A, Alcobendas R, udaondo C, Sendagorta E, Balsa A, de Miguel E, Plasencia-Rodríguez C. Safety and Effectiveness of the Use of Combined Therapy with bDMARDS and tsDMARDs in Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-effectiveness-of-the-use-of-combined-therapy-with-bdmards-and-tsdmards-in-immune-mediated-inflammatory-diseases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/safety-and-effectiveness-of-the-use-of-combined-therapy-with-bdmards-and-tsdmards-in-immune-mediated-inflammatory-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology