ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 390

S-110483, a Novel and Selective EP4 Receptor Antagonist with Anti-Bone Destruction Activities

Toshitaka Ochiai1, Takashi Maeda2, Toshie Nagayasu-Tanaka2, Jun Anzai1, Daiki Kato1, Yuta Morisaki2, Kiyoharu Ukai2 and Masahiro Suda2, 1Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., LTD, Kyoto, Japan, 2Pharmacology Department, Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., LTD, Kyoto, Japan

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: adjuvant arthritis, DMARDs, joint destruction and osteoclastogenesis, RANK/RANKL pathway

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Animal Models Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: S-110483 is our novel potent and selective EP4 receptor (EP4) antagonist. In addition to the well-known fact that EP4 antagonists have anti-inflammatory effects, it has recently been shown that the prostaglandin E2-EP4 signal is involved in osteoclastogenesis through RANKL expression in osteoblasts. Therefore, EP4 antagonists are expected to become useful DMARDs with anti-inflammatory and anti-bone destruction effects. The objective of this study is to clarify the usefulness of S-110483 as a novel DMARD, and it consists of the following experiments. (1) To evaluate the effects of S-110483 on the osteoclastogenesis and RANKL expression as well as (2) to evaluate the therapeutic potentials of S-110483 as a novel DMARD using rat arthritis models.

Methods: 1. Osteoclastogenesis: Mice bone-marrow cells were stimulated with M-CSF/RANKL and the numbers of differentiated osteoclasts were counted. 2. RANKL expression on osteoblasts: Mice preosteoblast cell line (MC3T3-E1) was stimulated with IL-1β and RANKL expression was evaluated. 3. The therapeutic effects of S-110483 and DMARDs on an adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) model: Rats were orally administered S-110483 or DMARDs for 25 days starting immediately after the adjuvant injection. Paw volumes were measured regularly. Twenty-five days after the adjuvant injection, rats were sacrificed and the wet weight of the thymus was measured. Furthermore, bone condition was evaluated by using X-ray and micro CT analysis. 4. Therapeutic effects of S-110483 and celecoxib on collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) model: DA rats were immunized with type-II collagen in CFA, and arthritis score and the paw volume were measured regularly. S-110483 or celecoxib was administered orally once a day from arthritis onset. Sixteen days after arthritis onset, bone condition was evaluated.

Results: 1. S-110483 (1–10 µmol/L) inhibited the osteoclastogenesis and its effect was more potent than tofacitinib and MTX. 2. S-110483 (1–10 µmol/L) also inhibited RANKL expression of osteoblast as well as DMARDs. 3. In the AIA model, anti-edema and anti-bone destruction effects of S-110483 were comparable with those of MTX (1 mg/kg), and were more potent than those of tofacitinib (10 mg/kg) and iguratimod (10 mg/kg). Furthermore, S-110483 showed the inhibitory effect on inflammation-related bone formation, unlike DMARDs, suggesting that S-110483 possessed excellent inhibitory effects on joint deformity. Interestingly, S-110483 improved thymus atrophy, an index of immunosuppression, unlike MTX and tofacitinib. 4. In the CIA model, while anti-edema effect of S-110483 was comparable to that of celecoxib (10 mg/kg), the anti-bone destruction effect of S-110483 was significantly more potent than that of celecoxib (10 mg/kg).

Conclusion: Our novel EP4 antagonist, S-110483, has not only anti-inflammatory effects but also has direct effects on osteoclasts and osteoblasts, similar to DMARDs. Furthermore, the anti-edema and anti-bone destruction effects of S-110483, without strong immunosuppressive effect, are comparable to those of DMARDs. These findings would support the excellent potential of S-110483 as a clinically useful DMARD.


Disclosure: T. Ochiai, None; T. Maeda, None; T. Nagayasu-Tanaka, None; J. Anzai, None; D. Kato, None; Y. Morisaki, None; K. Ukai, None; M. Suda, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ochiai T, Maeda T, Nagayasu-Tanaka T, Anzai J, Kato D, Morisaki Y, Ukai K, Suda M. S-110483, a Novel and Selective EP4 Receptor Antagonist with Anti-Bone Destruction Activities [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/s-110483-a-novel-and-selective-ep4-receptor-antagonist-with-anti-bone-destruction-activities/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/s-110483-a-novel-and-selective-ep4-receptor-antagonist-with-anti-bone-destruction-activities/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology