ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1303

Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Interstitial Lung Disease Secondary to Connective Tissue Disease

Lisa Zhu1, Shufeng Li2, Laurence Gagne3, Susan Jacobs4, Julie Morisset3, Joshua Mooney5, Rishi Raj5 and Lorinda Chung6, 1Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, 2Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 3Centre Hospitalier de l’Universite de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 5Pulmonary and Critical Care, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, 6Rheumatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: interstitial lung disease and rituximab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases Poster II: Interstitial Lung Disease, Still's Disease, FMF, Polychondritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in connective tissue diseases (CTD). CTD-related ILD (CTD-ILD) has typically been treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide. B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab is increasingly being used in CTD-ILD based on the concept that B cells play a key role in the inflammatory process. The goal of this study was to compare the effect of rituximab versus MMF on pulmonary function in patients with CTD-ILD.

Methods: The study was conducted at two sites, Stanford and Centre Hospitalier de l’Universite de Montreal. Retrospective chart review was performed on 83 subjects; the 15 patients in the treatment group received rituximab ± MMF (10/15 received both), and the 68 patients in the control group received MMF only. All had documented ILD and met validated classification criteria for a specific CTD, including systemic sclerosis (n=26), dermatomyositis/polymyositis (16), rheumatoid arthritis (15), Sjogren’s syndrome (12), mixed connective tissue disease (8), and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (6). The difference in predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) at baseline and after 6-12 months of therapy was compared between the treatment group and control group by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Linear mixed models accounting for repeated measures assessed for changes in PFTs over time. Kaplan-Meier estimates compared survival between groups.

Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, ethnicity, baseline FVC, presence of pulmonary hypertension, or concurrent use of other immunosuppressive medications. However ILD duration prior to treatment initiation was longer in the treatment group at 47 months (range 4-170 months) versus 6.5 months (range 0-164 months) in the control group (p=0.0003). Baseline DLCO was numerically lower in the treatment group at 51.5% (range 28-76%) versus 62.0% (range 27-116%, p=0.058) in the control group. Wilcoxon rank-sum testing revealed a 3.5% (range -11-21%) decrease in FVC in the treatment group compared to a 2.0% (range -14-25%) increase in the control group (p=0.029), and a 3.0% (range -10-12%) decrease in DLCO in the treatment group compared to a 4.5% (range -30-36%) increase in the control group (p=0.046).

Mixed model analysis controlling for ILD disease duration at treatment initiation, baseline DLCO, SSc vs. non-SSc, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and use of prednisone showed no significant difference in FVC between groups at 6 months (-1.77 (95% CI -10.25-6.72), p=0.70) and 1 year (-3.06 (95% CI -11.59-5.46), p=0.48). There was a non-significant decrease in DLCO in the treatment compared to control group at 6 months (-4.58 (95% CI -10.28-1.12), p=0.11), and a significant decrease at 1 year (-6.20 (95% CI -11.97–0.43), p=0.04). The all-cause mortality rate was 2/15 in the treatment group and 6/68 in the control group, with 1, 2, and 3 year survival rates of 100%, 100%, and 89% vs. 99%, 94%, and 92%, respectively (p=0.45).

Conclusion: Rituximab ± MMF did not improve pulmonary function, but resulted in similar survival compared to MMF alone in a recalcitrant population of CTD-ILD.


Disclosure: L. Zhu, None; S. Li, None; L. Gagne, None; S. Jacobs, None; J. Morisset, None; J. Mooney, None; R. Raj, None; L. Chung, Third Rock Ventures; Incyte, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Zhu L, Li S, Gagne L, Jacobs S, Morisset J, Mooney J, Raj R, Chung L. Rituximab Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Interstitial Lung Disease Secondary to Connective Tissue Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rituximab-versus-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-interstitial-lung-disease-secondary-to-connective-tissue-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rituximab-versus-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-interstitial-lung-disease-secondary-to-connective-tissue-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology