ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L21

Rituximab versus Conventional Therapeutic Strategy for Remission Induction in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Benjamin Terrier1, Gregory Pugnet2, Claire de Moreuil3, Bernard Bonnotte4, Ygal Benhamou5, Elisabeth Diot6, Dominique Chauveau2, Pierre Duffau7, Nicolas Limal8, Antoine Neel9, Geoffrey Urbanski10, Noemie Jourde-Chiche11, Nicolas Martin-Silva12, Francois Maurier13, Arsene Mekinian14, Nicolas Schleinitz11, Felix Ackermann15, Anne-Laure Fauchais16, Antoine Froissart17, Thomas Le Gallou18, Yurdagul Uzunhan19, Jean-Francois Viallard7, Alice Berezne20, Laurent Chiche21, Bruno Crestani14, Guillaume Direz22, Cecile-Audrey Durel23, Pascal Godmer24, Jean-Emmanuel Kahn25, Marc Lambert26, Thomas Quemeneur27, Jacques Cadranel14, Pierre Charles28, Antoine Dossier14, Lea Jilet29, Loic Guillevin14, Hendy Abdoul29 and Xavier Puechal14, 1Cochin Hospital, Paris, France, 2CHU, Toulouse, France, 3CHU, Brest, France, 4CHU, Dijon, France, 5CHU, Rouen, France, 6CHU, Tours, France, 7CHU, Bordeaux, France, 8CHU, Creteil, France, 9CHU, Nantes, France, 10CHU, Angers, France, 11CHU, Marseille, France, 12CHU, Caen, France, 13CH, Metz, France, 14CHU, Paris, France, 15Hopital Foch, Suresnes, France, 16CHU, Limoges, France, 17CHIC, Creteil, France, 18CHU, Rennes, France, 19CHU, Bobigny, France, 20CH, Annecy, France, 21CH, Marseille, France, 22CH, Le Mans, France, 23CHU, Lyon, France, 24CH, Vannes, France, 25CHU, Boulogne, France, 26CHRU, Lille, France, 27CH, Valenciennes, France, 28CH, Paris, France, 29URC, Paris, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Date of first publication: October 22, 2021

Keywords: B-Cell Targets, Eosinophilic Granulomatosus with Polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss), Late-Breaking 2021, Randomized Trial, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Late-Breaking Abstracts (L16 - L21)

Session Type: Late-Breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:45AM-12:00PM

Background/Purpose: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is an eosinophilic ANCA-associated vasculitis.Glucocorticoids, alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide in severe forms, induce remission in most patients with EGPA. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody depleting B cells, demonstrated efficacy in other ANCA-associated vasculitides. Rituximab might be indicated in the treatment of EGPA.

Methods: This phase 3, comparative, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind and superiority research compared rituximab-based regimen with conventional therapeutic strategies for the induction of remission.Patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing disease were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive: the experimental therapeutic strategy based on the use of rituximab, or the conventional therapeutic strategy based on Five-Factor Score (FFS)-assessed disease severity. The primary end point was the rate of patients who achieved remission at day 180 as defined by BVAS=0 and a prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day. Secondary end points were duration of remission during the study period, the average daily glucocorticoid dose and safety.

Results: A total of 105 participants underwent randomization (74 with newly diagnosed EGPA, 63 with FFS=0, 59 with negative ANCA), with 52 participants assigned to receive rituximab and 53 to conventional strategy. At day 180, remission was achieved in 33 patients in the rituximab group (63.5%) and in 32 patients in the conventional strategy group (60.4%) (relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.42, P=0.75). At day 360, remission was achieved in 31 patients in the rituximab group (59.6%) and in 34 patients in the conventional strategy group (64.2%) (relative risk, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.45, P=0.63).

Mean duration of remission was 16.4 (10.37) and 16.2 (11.68) weeks in the rituximab group and the conventional strategy group, respectively. All relapse and major relapse rates were comparable between the two groups. SF-36 was similar between the two groups. However, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) at day 180 and day 360 (p=0.07 and p=0.09, respectively) and vasculitis damage index (VDI) at day 360 (p=0.07) tended to be better in the rituximab group. There was no significant difference in average daily glucocorticoid dose between the two arms, with an area under the curve of 4591 mg in the rituximab group and 4453 mg for the conventional strategy group.

Conclusion: In EGPA patients participating to this double-blind randomized controlled trial, rituximab was not superior to conventional therapeutic strategy based on FFS to induce vasculitis remission (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; REOVAS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02807103).


B. Terrier, None; G. Pugnet, None; C. de Moreuil, None; B. Bonnotte, None; Y. Benhamou, None; E. Diot, None; D. Chauveau, None; P. Duffau, None; N. Limal, None; A. Neel, None; G. Urbanski, None; N. Jourde-Chiche, None; N. Martin-Silva, None; F. Maurier, None; A. Mekinian, None; N. Schleinitz, None; F. Ackermann, None; A. Fauchais, None; A. Froissart, None; T. Le Gallou, None; Y. Uzunhan, None; J. Viallard, None; A. Berezne, None; L. Chiche, None; B. Crestani, None; G. Direz, None; C. Durel, None; P. Godmer, None; J. Kahn, None; M. Lambert, None; T. Quemeneur, None; J. Cadranel, None; P. Charles, None; A. Dossier, None; L. Jilet, None; L. Guillevin, None; H. Abdoul, None; X. Puechal, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Terrier B, Pugnet G, de Moreuil C, Bonnotte B, Benhamou Y, Diot E, Chauveau D, Duffau P, Limal N, Neel A, Urbanski G, Jourde-Chiche N, Martin-Silva N, Maurier F, Mekinian A, Schleinitz N, Ackermann F, Fauchais A, Froissart A, Le Gallou T, Uzunhan Y, Viallard J, Berezne A, Chiche L, Crestani B, Direz G, Durel C, Godmer P, Kahn J, Lambert M, Quemeneur T, Cadranel J, Charles P, Dossier A, Jilet L, Guillevin L, Abdoul H, Puechal X. Rituximab versus Conventional Therapeutic Strategy for Remission Induction in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rituximab-versus-conventional-therapeutic-strategy-for-remission-induction-in-eosinophilic-granulomatosis-with-polyangiitis-a-double-blind-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rituximab-versus-conventional-therapeutic-strategy-for-remission-induction-in-eosinophilic-granulomatosis-with-polyangiitis-a-double-blind-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology