ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2455

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Biologic and Non-Biologic Dmards

Judith Maro1, Talia Menzin2, Kenneth Hornbuckle3, Jon T. Giles4, Arthur Kavanaugh5, Thomas Dörner6, David Martin7, Jane Huang1 and Claudia A. Salinas3, 1Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Harvard Pilgrim Health Center, Boston, MA, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 4Columbia University, New York, NY, 5University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 6Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 7Food and Drug Administration, Indianapolis, IN

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, Co-morbidities, DMARDs and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster III: Complications of Therapy, Outcomes, and Measures

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), compared with non-RA populations based on several recent studies1,2.  However, information is sparse on the risk of VTE among patients receiving treatment with specific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or categories of therapies. The objective was to estimate the incidence of VTE among patients receiving routine clinical care for RA, specifically during treatment with conventional (c) and biologic (b) DMARDs.

Methods: Incidence rates were estimated in a retrospective cohort study of patients with RA (defined as at least 2 International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] Diagnostic codes) enrolled in US health insurance plans between October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2015 and participating in the Innovation in Medical Evidence Development and Surveillance (IMEDS) program. These data are formatted into the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Sentinel Common Data Model and Sentinel’s publicly available standardized analysis tools were used to estimate the incidence rates of VTE following initiation of cDMARDs or bDMARDs. Patients were required to be new users of the study drug class, with no evidence of use in the 365 days preceding initiation and were not allowed to re-enter the cohort. Patients were required to demonstrate continuous use of the study drug class to be considered at risk for VTE. VTE was defined based on ICD-9-CM codes, but patients diagnosed in outpatient settings were also required to have evidence of oral anticoagulant dispensing within 31 days of the event. PE and DVT ICD-9-CM codes were also disaggregated to produce separate incidence rates.

Results: During treatment with any cDMARDs (methotrexate or leflunomide) or bDMARDs (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, and tocilizumab), patients experienced VTE at a crude incidence rate of 1.49 (95% CI 1.30, 1.71) per 100 person-years (PY) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.83, 1.14) per 100 PY, respectively. For each study drug class, age was an important risk factor for VTE, with increasing age associated with higher rates of VTE; for example, during treatment with bDMARDs incidence rate (IR)18-49 years=0.69, IR50-59 years=0.65, IR60-64 years=0.94, and IR65+ years=2.11 per 100 PY (Figure 1). Men also had higher incidence rates of VTE than women. In the analyses of PE and DVT, DVT incidence rates were higher than PE incidence rates, and similar incidence rate trends overall and across age strata for cDMARD and bDMARD cohorts were noted.

Conclusion: Venous thromboembolism is an important clinical concern among patients with RA and incidence rates vary by age and sex during routine clinical treatment with DMARDs.

 


Disclosure: J. Maro, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2; T. Menzin, None; K. Hornbuckle, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; J. T. Giles, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5; A. Kavanaugh, for Eli Lilly and Company, 5; T. Dörner, Roche/Chugai, Janssen, Sanofi, 2,AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Roche, UCB, MSD, Pfizer/Hospira, Novartis, 5,Amgen, Celgene, Biogen, 8; D. Martin, FDA, 3; J. Huang, None; C. A. Salinas, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maro J, Menzin T, Hornbuckle K, Giles JT, Kavanaugh A, Dörner T, Martin D, Huang J, Salinas CA. Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Biologic and Non-Biologic Dmards [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-venous-thromboembolism-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-biologic-and-non-biologic-dmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-venous-thromboembolism-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-biologic-and-non-biologic-dmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology