ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 361

Risk Of Venous Thromboembolism and Use Of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs For Rheumatoid Arthritis

Seoyoung C. Kim1, Daniel H. Solomon2,3, Jun Liu4, Jessica M. Franklin5, Robert J. Glynn6 and Sebastian Schneeweiss7, 1Div. of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Div. of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Boston, MA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Boston, MA, 5Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 6Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 7Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Comorbidities in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Recent research suggests that rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an autoimmune systemic inflammatory disease, increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. We compared the risk of VTE in RA patients initiating treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD), methotrexate (MTX) or non-biologic DMARD (nbDMARD). 

 

Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study combining three U.S. commercial insurance claims databases (2001-2012). Adult patients with a new diagnosis of RA were identified based on ≥2 RA diagnoses that were ≥7 days apart with a baseline period free of RA diagnosis or DMARD use for ≥1 year. Among these patients, initiators (starting or switching) of various DMARDs were identified.  Patients with a history of VTE, malignancy and use of anticoagulants at baseline were excluded. Drug regimens were categorized into three mutually exclusive hierarchical groups: (1) a biologic DMARD with or without nbDMARDs, (2) MTX without a biologic DMARD, or (3) nbDMARDs without a biologic DMARD or MTX. We calculated incidence rates (IR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of VTE identified by a previously validated algorithm with inpatient diagnosis codes (PPV 75-90%). Cox proportional hazards models stratified by propensity score (PS) deciles after asymmetric trimming were used for 3 pairwise comparisons, controlling for baseline demographic factors, comorbidities, medications, and health care utilization. Sensitivity analysis limited to 180 days of follow-up and PS-matched analyses were also performed.

 

Results:  A total of 29,481 RA patients with 39,647 treatment episodes were identified.  Mean (SD) age was 49 (12) years for bDMARD and nbDMARD groups and 51 (12) for MTX. The crude IR of VTE per 1,000 person-years was higher in the bDMARDs group (5.53, 95% CI 3.67-8.32) compared to nbDMARDs and MTX (Table). In the PS decile-stratified Cox regression, the hazard ratio (HR) of VTE associated with initiation of bDMARDs was 1.83 (95% CI 0.92-3.63) compared to nbDMARDs and 1.39 (95% CI 0.73-2.64) compared to MTX. The HR of VTE associated with initiation of MTX versus nbDMARDs was 0.78 (95% CI 0.50-1.21). In a sensitivity analysis limiting the follow-up up to 180 days, bDMARDs was associated with a significantly increased risk (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.14-5.40). In the PS-matched analyses, the HR was 1.34 (95% CI 0.65-2.75) in bDMARDs vs. nbDMARDs and 1.73 (95% CI 0.90-3.32) in bDMARDs vs. MTX.

 

Conclusion: Among newly diagnosed RA patients, initiating a bDMARD was associated with a likely increase, but not statistically significant, in the risk of incident VTE compared to those initiating MTX or nbDMARDs, albeit low absolute risks of VTE. Initiation of bDMARDs was significantly associated with a 2.5-times elevated risk of VTE in the first 180 days.

 

Table.  Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with initiation of DMARDs: PS decile-stratified ‘as treated’ analysis

Exposure

Treatment episodes

VTE

Person-years

(PY)

IR (95% CI)

per 1,000 PY

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

0-180d only

bDMARDs

4488

23

4157.90

5.53 (3.67-8.32)

1.83 (0.92-3.63)

2.48 (1.14-5.40)

nbDMARDs

12859

32

7220.08

4.43 (3.13-6.26)

Ref

Ref

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

bDMARDs

4597

21

4368.17

4.81 (3.14-7.38)

1.39 (0.73-2.64)

1.80 (0.84-3.85)

MTX

13912

32

9258.12

3.46 (2.45-4.89)

Ref

Ref

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTX

16352

42

11075.60

3.79 (2.80-5.13)

0.78 (0.50-1.21)

0.86 (0.50-1.48)

nbDMARDs

14618

41

8249.97

4.97 (3.66-6.75)

Ref

Ref

 


Disclosure:

S. C. Kim,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Pfizer and Asisa ,

9;

D. H. Solomon,

Lilly, Amgen, CORRONA,

2,

Lilly, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer,

6,

Lilly, BMS, Novartis,

9;

J. Liu,
None;

J. M. Franklin,
None;

R. J. Glynn,

AstraZeneca,

2,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

2;

S. Schneeweiss,

Pfizer Inc, ,

2,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

2,

Boehringer Ingelheim,

2,

WHISCON, LLC,

5,

BOOZ and Company,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-venous-thromboembolism-and-use-of-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-for-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology