ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1849

Risk of Malignancy Among Medicare Psoriasis/Psoriasis Arthritis Patients

Huifeng Yun1, Kevin L. Winthrop2, Lang Chen3, Wilson Smith4, Benjamin Chan5, Fenglong Xie6, Allison Taylor4 and Jeffrey R. Curtis7, 1Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, 2Dept of Infectious Disease, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 3Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Clinical Immunology/Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 6Rheumatology & Immunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 7University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: malignancy and psoriatic arthritis, Medicare

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis III - Clinical Aspects Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose The introduction of biologics has greatly changed the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (PsO). However, there are concerns regarding the risk of malignancy associated biologic medications. This analysis evaluated the association between malignancy and biologics among US patients with PsA or PsO enrolled in the Medicare program

Methods

Using data from 2006-2011 for 100% of patients with patients with PsA and PsO, we defined separate PsA and PsO cohorts based upon >= 1  rheumatologist visit for PsA or >= 1 dermatologist visit for PsO, followed by a prescription or administration of etanercept (ETA), adalimumab (ADA), ustekinumab (UST), methotrexate (MTX), cyclosporine (CIC) or ultraviolet light therapy (UV). Patients could be in both cohorts if they meet criteria for each cohort. We identified new treatment episodes, defined specific to each drug as no use of that therapy in the prior 6 month ‘baseline’ period. Patients contributing treatment episodes with history of organ transplantation, infection with human immunodeficiency virus, advanced kidney (hemodialysis-dependent), severe liver disease, or cancer diagnoses were excluded. Eligible subjects were continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B and D in baseline and throughout follow-up. We excluded treatment episodes of UV if patients were on biologics or DMARDS at baseline, and episodes of non-biologic therapy if patients were on biologics during the baseline. Follow up started from the drug initiation date and ended at the earliest date of: malignancy (exclude non-melanoma skin cancer), a 90 day gap in current exposure, death, loss of coverage or Dec 31, 2011. We identified malignancy using validated claims-based algorithm using physician diagnoses (ICD9 140-208, except 173.x), cancer-related procedures and chemotherapy. We calculated the incidence rate (IR) of malignancy for each exposure. Using pairwise propensity scores (PS) to balance multiple confounders, we compared malignancy risk using Cox regression, adjusting for PS quintile.

Results We identified 10,261 PsA and 31,052 PsO new treatments episodes. For the PsA cohort, 50% of treatment-episode exposure time was in common with the PsO, and 20% of PsO exposure time was in common with PsA exposures. During follow up, patients in the PsA cohort experienced 13 (ADA), <11 (CIC), 10 (ETA), 50 (MTX), <11 (UV) malignancies, the PsO cohort experienced 29 (ADA), 26 (CIC), 28 (ETA), 123 (MTX), 64 (UV) malignancies.  The overall IR in PsA was 8.1/1000, ranging from a low of 4.2 (UV) to a high of 11.3 (MTX). None of the hazard ratios for comparisons between biologic and non-biologic exposure groups reached statistical significance. The overall IR in the PsO cohort was 9.2/1000 ranging from 5.0(ETA) to 12.9 (CIC).  After multivariable adjustment, there was a significantly lower risk for ETA compared to non-biologic therapies: ETA versus CIC (HR: 0.50 95% CI: 0.27-0.93), ETA versus MTX (HR: 0.56 95% CI: 0.35-0.87), ETA versus UV (HR: 0.49 95% CI: 0.29-0.83).

Conclusion

Among older patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, there was no evidence of an increased risk of malignancy for patients treated with biologics compared to non-biologic therapies, and some possibility of a reduced risk.


Disclosure:

H. Yun,

Amgen,

2;

K. L. Winthrop,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Pfizer, UCB, AbbVie, Genentech,

5;

L. Chen,
None;

W. Smith,
None;

B. Chan,
None;

F. Xie,
None;

A. Taylor,
None;

J. R. Curtis,

Roche, Genentech, UCB Pharma, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

2,

Roche, Genentech, UCB Pharma, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-malignancy-among-medicare-psoriasispsoriasis-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology