ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2646

Risk of Hepatitis B Reactivation in Inflammatory Arthritis Patients Receiving Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tzu-Chieh Lin1, Mirhelen Mendes De Abreu2, Sara K. Tedeschi1, Kazuki Yoshida3 and Daniel H. Solomon2, 1Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologic agents, DMARDs, hepatitis and inflammatory arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: There is limited information for the rate of hepatitis B reactivation in inflammatory arthritis patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, assessing hepatitis B reactivation rates in patients who were with resolved or chronic hepatitis B, receiving non-biologic DMARDs, TNF-alpha inhibitors or other biologics and whether receiving antiviral prophylaxis.

Methods: We utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement as the standard for protocol development. Electronic searches were conducted in Pubmed, Medline and EMBASE using OVID through 12/31/2015. A search strategy was developed for each database by combing the medical subject headings (MeSH) and/or text terms from following inclusion criteria: participants (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, with resolved, or chronic hepatitis B infection), interventions (non-biologic DMARDs, TNF-alpha inhibitors and non-TNF biologics), and outcomes (hepatitis B reactivation). Four reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed quality of study with the Newcastle-Ottawa scales. To determine the pooled hepatitis B reactivation rate, the variances of the raw proportions were stabilized using a Freeman-Tukey-type arcsine square root transformation, using a random-effects model.

Results: 25 studies that met our inclusion criteria, including 2 case series, 10 prospective and 13 retrospective observational studies. The overall pooled rate of hepatitis B reactivation was 1.6% (table1, 95%CI, 0.8-2.6%, I2: 51.0%) in patients with resolved hepatitis B and 14.6% (95%CI, 4.3-29.0%, I2: 89.6%) in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Similar rates were observed in resolved patients on TNF-alpha inhibitors (Pooled rate: 1.4%, 95%CI, 0.5-2.6%) and non-biologic DMARDs (Pooled rate: 1.7%, 95%CI, 0.2-4.2%); whereas a higher rate was observed in other biologics users (Pooled rate: 6.1%, 95%CI, 0.0-16.6%). We also found the reactivation rate was lower in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection who received antiviral prophylaxis on TNF alpha treatments (table 2, Pooled rate: 4.4%, 95%CI, 0.4-11.7%), than those who did not (Pooled rate: 15.6%, 95%CI, 2.3-35.7%).

Conclusion: We found the hepatitis B reactivation rate in inflammatory arthritis patients was low in resolved patients and moderate in chronic hepatitis B patients. Further, higher rates were observed in chronic hepatitis B patients without antiviral prophylaxis. Table 1. HBV reactivation rates in inflammatory arthritis patients with resolved hepatitis B , on various DMARDs exposures and without antiviral prophylaxis

Resolved HBV*

Antiviral prophylaxis (-)

N

Event

Pooled Rate,% (95%CI)

P value**

Summary

1,032

16

1.6 (0.8-2.6)

0.27

  TNF-alpha inhibitors

629

8

1.4 (0.5-2.6)

0.26

  Non-TNF biologics

69

3

6.1 (0.0-16.6)

0.07

  Non-biologic DMARDs

334

5

1.7 (0.2-4.2)

0.22

*Resolved HBV: HbsAg (-), HbcAb (+) **P value for study heterogeneity within drug classes. TNF: tumor necrosis factor; DMARD: Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs. Table 2. HBV reactivation rates in inflammatory arthritis patients with chronic hepatitis B, without or with antiviral prophylaxis

Chronic* HBV

Antiviral prophylaxis (-)

Antiviral prophylaxis (+)

N

Event

Pooled Rate,% (95%CI)

P value**

N

Event

Pooled Rate,% (95%CI)

P value**

Summary

160

24

14.6 (4.3-29.0)

<0.001

99

12

9.2 (1.4-21.6)

0.01

 TNF-alpha inhibitors

64

11

15.6 (2.3-35.7)

0.05

57

2

4.4 (0.4-11.7)

0.73

Non-TNF biologic DMARDs

58

13

22.4 (8.1-40.8)

0.11

28

10

36.2 (19.4-54.8)

0.68

*Chronic HBV: HbsAg (+) **P value for study heterogeneity within drug classes. TNF: tumor necrosis factor; DMARD: Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs.


Disclosure: T. C. Lin, None; M. M. D. Abreu, None; S. K. Tedeschi, None; K. Yoshida, None; D. H. Solomon, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lin TC, Abreu MMD, Tedeschi SK, Yoshida K, Solomon DH. Risk of Hepatitis B Reactivation in Inflammatory Arthritis Patients Receiving Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-hepatitis-b-reactivation-in-inflammatory-arthritis-patients-receiving-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-dmards-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-hepatitis-b-reactivation-in-inflammatory-arthritis-patients-receiving-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-dmards-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology