ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 707

Risk of Cancer in Systemic Sclerosis: Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Cohort Studies

Akira Onishi1, Daisuke Sugiyama2, Akio Morinobu3 and Shunichi Kumagai4, 1Rheumaology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 2Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan, 3Department of Clinical Pathology and Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 4Center of Rheumatic Diseases, Shinko Hospital, Kobe, Japan

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Malignancy, meta-analysis and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The risk of cancer compared with general population has been elevated in several connective tissue diseases. However, the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for overall cancer in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) were inconsistent. Moreover, most of existing studies were limited in size and based on hospital case series, with attendant selection and referral biases. We therefore aimed to examine, using meta-analysis, cancer risk in patients with SSc deriving from population-based cohort studies, as compared with the expected risks in age- matched background populations.

Methods: We searched five different databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane Collaboration databases), reference lists of retrieved studies and review articles from January 1966 until May 2012. Population-based cohort studies relevant for determining cancer risk in patients with SSc were included. All papers fulfilling the strict inclusion criteria were scrutinized for data on population size, time of follow-up and observed to expected cancer rates (standardized incidence ratio (SIR)). Two investigators independently evaluated the quality of the studies by using a scoring system that was created on the basis of a recently used system designed with reference to MOOSE, QUAST and STROBE. Data syntheses were based on random effects model.

Results: Seven articles were included. The pooled SIR for overall cancer was 1.50 (95% CI: 1.23-1.83). The pooled SIR of 1.85 (95% CI: 1.49-2.31) for men was significantly higher than that of 1.33 (95% CI: 1.18-1.49) for women (p =0.009) and stratification on sex eliminated heterogeneity. Stratification based on type of SSc did not produce statistically significant differences in the pooled SIR between limited SSc and diffuse SSc (p = 0.98). The significant increased risk of cancer of the lung (SIR: 3.18; 95% CI: 2.09-4.85), the liver (SIR: 4.36; 95% CI: 2.00-9.51), the hematological system (SIR: 3.55; 95% CI: 1.70-7.43), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.43-5.14), leukemia (SIR: 2.75; 95% CI: 1.32-5.73) and the bladder (SIR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.06-3.77) was observed. The pooled SIR for non-melanoma skin cancer was significantly increased only in men, while the pooled SIR for bladder cancer was significantly increased only in women. The appearance of funnel plots was symmetrical and Egger’s test results were not significant (p = 0.60).


Conclusion: In conclusion, SSc are associated with an increased risk of cancer, particularly lung, liver, hematological and bladder cancer. Men with SSc are at higher cancer risk than women.


Disclosure:

A. Onishi,
None;

D. Sugiyama,
None;

A. Morinobu,
None;

S. Kumagai,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-cancer-in-systemic-sclerosis-meta-analysis-of-population-based-cohort-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology