ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 823

Risk of Active Tuberculosis in Patients with Arthritis Receiving TNF-α Inhibitors: A Look Beyond the Baseline Tuberculosis Screening Protocol

Alina Soare1, Carina Mihai2, Ana Maria Gherghe2, Rucsandra Dobrota2, Raida Oneata2, Simona Pintilie2, Mihaela Milicescu2, Ioan Ancuta2, Andrei Martin2, Mariana Sasu2, Claudia Ciofu2, Liviu Macovei2, Victor Stoica2 and Mihai Bojinca2, 1internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy & Cantacuzino Hospital, Bucharest, Romania, 2Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy & Cantacuzino Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, prevention, risk and tuberculosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health I: Drug and Vaccine Safety

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major concern in patients receiving TNF inhibitors (TNFi), especially in countries with a high TB burden.  Careful TB screening is mandatory before TNFi initiation, and patients with latent TB receive prophylactic treatment. This study aimed to assess the incidence of active TB and the efficacy of TB prevention measures in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS)receiving TNFi, in an academic Rheumatology center.


Methods

Data of all patients who received treatment with TNFi in our clinic between Jan 1st2001 and June 1st2014 have been retrospectively analyzed. Demographics, baseline TB screening, TB prophylaxis, duration of TNFi treatment and reported active TB data were extracted from clinical records. The cohort was divided into 3 groups according to the mandatory TB screening method at baseline: tuberculin skin test (TST) with a positive threshold of either >10mm (01.2001-12.2005) = group TST1, or >5mm (01.2006-08.2010) = group TST2, and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test (09.2010-06.2014) = group QTF. All patients tested positive for latent TB received prophylaxis with isoniazide for 9 months. Cases of TB reactivation were defined as TB occurring at <12 months since TNFi initiation. The incidence of active TB was analyzed for each group and compared to TB incidence data in Romanian general population, retrieved from the World Health Organization (WHO) reports. The impact of the screening method on the incidence of active TB was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression.

Results

A total of 550 patients were included (304 RA, 43 PsA and 203 AS). According to the initial TB screening method, 77 patients belonged to the TST1, 251 to the TST2 and 222 to the QTF group. The number of active TB cases/ time of exposure to TNFi in person-years (PY) in the 3 groups was 9/477.3, 9/1081.5 and 3/445.5 respectively, accounting for an incidence of 1885.7, 832.2 and 673.4 cases per 100,000 PY. These numbers are significantly higher than the incidence of TB in Romania,which decreased from 147 to 94 per 100,000 PY from 2001 to 2013.

Cases classified as latent TB reactivation/total TB cases in the TST1, TST2 and QTF groups were only 2/9, 2/9 and 1/3 respectively, while the remaining TB cases were more likely new TB infection. Using Cox regression adjusted for age, sex and disease, we found no influence of the TB screening method on the risk of latent TB reactivation. However, the TST1 group had a significantly higher TB risk, with the QTF group as reference, when all cases of active TB were analyzed: hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] were 9.33[1.64-53.10], p=0.012 for TST1 and 1.68 [0.43-6.59], p=0,445 for TST2, suggesting that the period of TNFi initiation in TST1, when the TB incidence in general population was higher than in the later years, determined a higher risk for active TB.


Conclusion In a country with high TB burden, where all patients initiated on TNFi are screened for latent TB at baseline, new TB infection exceeds latent TB reactivation. TB incidence in these patients is much higher than in the general population and baseline screening does not solve the problem of later infection, suggesting the necessity of yearly TB re-screening.


Disclosure:

A. Soare,
None;

C. Mihai,
None;

A. M. Gherghe,
None;

R. Dobrota,
None;

R. Oneata,
None;

S. Pintilie,
None;

M. Milicescu,
None;

I. Ancuta,
None;

A. Martin,
None;

M. Sasu,
None;

C. Ciofu,
None;

L. Macovei,
None;

V. Stoica,
None;

M. Bojinca,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/risk-of-active-tuberculosis-in-patients-with-arthritis-receiving-tnf-%ce%b1-inhibitors-a-look-beyond-the-baseline-tuberculosis-screening-protocol/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology