ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1112

Rheumatologists’ Opinions and Use of Telemedicine in the Southwestern U.S

Kimberly Reiter1, 1Albuquerque VA Medical Center, University of NM School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: access to care and standards of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Health Services Research Poster II – ACR/ARP

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Telemedicine (TM) is increasingly employed in chronic disease management and can reduce barriers in access to care. In the Southwestern U.S., where there is a disproportionate shortage of rheumatologists, TM may be one tool to improve access to rheumatology care.  While use of TM in rheumatology is growing, the nature of rheumatology patient evaluations presents unique challenges to this modality of care. We sought to understand the attitudes of rheumatologists in the Southwestern U.S. towards the use of TM in caring for patients with rheumatic diseases.

Methods: We surveyed a convenience sample of rheumatology providers attending the 19th Annual Rheumatic Diseases Conference in Santa Fe, NM. Respondents completed paper questionnaires in which we collected general provider information, and assessed use of and familiarity with TM, general attitudes towards TM, and perceived barriers to its use. All respondents were anonymous. Simple counts of provider responses are reported here.

Results: A total of 42 participants completed our survey: 39 were actively practicing rheumatology (31 physicians and 8 physician assistants or nurse practitioners). 32.5% of providers were part of independent small group or solo practices, 37.5% were employed by multispecialty or  hospital-affiliated groups, and 25% practiced in academic centers. 22 providers practiced in NM, followed by TX (9) and CO (5), and three were from non-Southwestern states. All but two providers (neither from NM) were practicing in underserved areas. Four providers from NM and CO reported practicing TM. Of those not using TM, 60.5% had considered providing TM services, while 17% had considered implementing TM services, but ultimately decided not to.  Among possible barriers to TM, current practice volume/workload, concerns about medical liability, and the need for hands-on physical exam for rheumatology patients were rated as “very important” factors in provider willingness to use TM (60%, 66.7%, and 66.7% of providers, respectively).  All respondents either somewhat (64.3%) or strongly (35%) agreed that TM use by rheumatologists would help address problems with access to rheumatology care. Over half of providers also cited the following factors as very important barriers to TM use: available resources for TM education and technology support/networking (57.5%); uncertainty about standards of care in TM (57.5%); and regulatory/compliance concerns (56.4%). Most providers were either neutral toward (39%) or somewhat agreed (46.3%) with the statement that the benefits afforded to patients by offering TM would be worth the investments required to implement these services.

Conclusion: While a majority of surveyed rheumatology providers in our area have considered using TM and generally agree that it would improve access to care, few have employed it in their practices. Current provider workload, and uncertainties surrounding practice logistics and adequate patient assessment represent important barriers to TM use. Increased educational efforts in TM technology, regional support for TM infrastructure, and further study and dissemination of patient care tools and standards of care may increase rheumatologist use of TM.


Figure1

Figure 1. Perceived Barriers to Telemedicine


Figure 2.2

Figure 2.


Disclosure: K. Reiter, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Reiter K. Rheumatologists’ Opinions and Use of Telemedicine in the Southwestern U.S [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologists-opinions-and-use-of-telemedicine-in-the-southwestern-u-s/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologists-opinions-and-use-of-telemedicine-in-the-southwestern-u-s/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology