ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1361

Rheumatologists’ Attitudes on Cardiovascular Risk and Lipid Screening in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis at an Academic Medical Center

Ashwini Komarla1 and Alexis Ogdie2, 1Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Rheumatology and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, Lipids, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and risk assessment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population. Thus, the recognition and management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with RA is especially important. Despite increased awareness of this risk, recent data suggests that adherence to both primary and secondary prevention strategies is low in the RA population compared to other high risk groups (e.g. diabetics). The objective of this study was to assess rheumatologists’ perceptions of screening for and treating hyperlipidemia (HLD) and CV risk factors in patients with RA to inform the development of quality improvement initiatives.

Methods:

In this qualitative study, all University of Pennsylvania rheumatologists were contacted with an email link to an online survey. The survey, administered via REDCap, included 15 questions assessing attitudes towards lipid screening and CV risk in RA. Answers were deindentified. The chi-squared test was used to examine the association between respondent characteristics and attitudes.

Results:

Of 28 survey invitations, 24 (85.7%) were returned. All respondents felt there was either a high (N=14) or moderate (N=10) risk of CV disease in RA. Rheumatologists’ perceptions of their practice are given in the Table. Seventeen (70.8%) respondents did not believe that primary care physicians (PCPs) are aware of the increased CV risk in RA. Eighteen (75%) believed that both rheumatologists and PCPs should screen for HLD in patients with RA; the remainder felt that PCPs are responsible. Female physicians were more likely to report that both rheumatologists and PCPs should be responsible for screening for HLD (p= 0.03). Nearly all respondents (87.5%) felt that PCPs should be responsible for treating HLD. When asked to rank the clinically most useful approach to estimating CV risk in RA among 3 options, 17 of 21 respondents ranked “CAD equivalent like diabetes mellitus” as their first choice. The most commonly mentioned barriers to screening were time (N=11), patient complexity (N=6), and forgetting or needing a prompt (N=4). An electronic health record (EHR) reminder was the most commonly mentioned idea for increasing HLD screening in rheumatology and primary care practices (N=11).

Conclusion:

All respondents believed that there is at least a moderately increased risk of CV disease in RA. Most believed that PCPs are not aware of the increased risk, but the majority also believed that PCPs should be responsible for treating HLD. Quality improvement strategies to bridge this disconnect are needed. Several barriers to screening were identified. Respondents recommended using an EHR prompt to increase screening for HLD and improve recognition of CV risk.


Table. Rheumatologists’ Perceptions of Their Own Practice

Question

Total Respondents – n (%)

Do you routinely check lipids in your patients with RA?

Never

1 (4.2)

Almost Never

5  (20.8)

Sometimes

8 (33.3)

Most of the Time

9 (37.5)

Always

1 (4.2)

Do you routinely initiate treatment of hyperlipidemia in your patients with RA?

Never

4 (16.7)

Almost Never

11 (45.8)

Sometimes

8 (33.3)

Most of the Time

1 (4.2)

Always

0

Do you regularly counsel your RA patients about the increased risk for cardiovascular disease?

Never

1 (4.2)

Almost Never

1 (4.2)

Sometimes

6 (25.0)

Most of the Time

12 (50.0)

Always

4 (16.7)

How comfortable do you feel in counseling about diet and exercise in your patients with RA and hyperlipidemia?

Not at all comfortable

1 (4.2)

Somewhat comfortable

6 (25.0)

Very comfortable

17 (70.8)

How comfortable do you feel initiating medication therapy for hyperlipidemia?

Not at all comfortable

2 (8.3)

Somewhat comfortable

12 (50.0)

Very comfortable

10 (41.7)


Disclosure:

A. Komarla,
None;

A. Ogdie,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologists-attitudes-on-cardiovascular-risk-and-lipid-screening-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-at-an-academic-medical-center/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology