ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 184

Rheumatologists and Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Discrepancy Between Attitudes, Desire and Reality in Routine Practice in South East England

Antigoni Grigoriou1 and Patrick Kiely2, 1Rheumatology, St George's Univeristy Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Practice and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I: Ultrasound, Optical Imaging and Capillaroscopy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK US) in routine care is expanding. The number of rheumatologists using or seeking to learn the technique is also increasing, though it is unclear how US is being incorporated into routine work practices (RWP). This survey sought to gain an insight into the use of MSK US in a region of Southern England.

Methods:

A questionnaire was designed by the authors to collect information on training, access & service delivery, indications and attitudes towards use of MSK US in RWP. All rheumatology consultants (RC), trainees (RT) and specialist nurses (SN) working in 19 Hospitals (Hs) (4 Medical School Universities, 15 District General) in London South, Kent, Surrey and Sussex regions of England were invited to complete the survey. Data were analysed using simple descriptive and summary statistics.

Results:

A total of 70 questionnaires (51%) were returned (RC 61%, RT 27%, SN 12%) with at least one response from all 19 Hs. 

Training:Of the 70 responders (Rs), 42% report having had formal training in the use of US, however only 12% had support for this and 10% have a formal MSK US certificate.

Access & service delivery:MSK US scans are most usually performed by radiologists (64%). In 11 Hs there are also US machines in the rheumatology department, of which 8/11 are currently used for routine care. The routine waiting time for a MSK US is up to 6 weeks.

10 of the 29 Rs who have had training (34%) perform US scans themselves. They report greatest confidence scanning the hands (90%), followed by feet (70%) and 20% are confident to scan all joints. US guided injections are given by 50% and US guided synovial biopsies performed by 20%.

The maximum number of joints scanned in one session varies from 5 – 40 joints, taking an average time of 20 minutes per scan.

Indications:MSK US are requested for diagnostic purposes by 92%, guided injection by 80%, assessment of treatment response by 52%,  research purposes by 8% and 75% request a scan at least 1 – 5 times a week. The proportion of Rs requesting MSK US per disease groups is: Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) >85% and soft tissue 63%.

Attitudes: More than 60% of the Rs report that MSK US results often lead to a change in their management plans and that it enhances patients’ satisfaction. 82% think it appropriate that RC should perform MSK US scans as part of their RWP. 50% of the RC and 72% of the RT think that proficiency in use of US should be a mandatory part of the rheumatology training curriculum. 51% of the Rs indicated a willingness to learn the technique.

Free text responses revealed concerns about available time and proper training but others commented that MSK US is beneficial in an early IA setting.

Conclusion:

This cross-sectional, observational, multicentre survey demonstrates widespread use of MSK US by rheumatologists in routine care in the South East Coast region of England. 82% of Rs think it appropriate that RC should perform MSK US in RWP and 57% believe training in this should be a mandatory part of the curriculum. In contrast 42% of Rs have had formal training, but only 10% of them have incorporated MSK US into RWP, the majority relying on radiology colleagues to do the scans. This illustrates a discrepancy between attitudes, desire and reality of MSK US use in routine rheumatological practice.


Disclosure: A. Grigoriou, None; P. Kiely, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Grigoriou A, Kiely P. Rheumatologists and Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Discrepancy Between Attitudes, Desire and Reality in Routine Practice in South East England [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologists-and-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-discrepancy-between-attitudes-desire-and-reality-in-routine-practice-in-south-east-england/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologists-and-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-discrepancy-between-attitudes-desire-and-reality-in-routine-practice-in-south-east-england/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology