ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1418

Rheumatologist: If You Fell Ill with Seropositive Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Yourself, What to Do!

Kalle Aaltonen1, Elena Nikiphorou2,3, Nasim A. Khan4 and Tuulikki Sokka5, 1Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland, 2Whittington Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 3Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland, 4Rheumatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR, 5Jyvaskyla Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: international, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and therapy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: International and national bodies have given evidence-based recommendations for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. We assessed the general uptake of these recommendations by asking rheumatologists about their initial treatment preferences in case they themselves developed RA.

Methods: An online survey was disseminated to practicing rheumatologists across the continents and also made accessible on social media platforms between April and June 2016.  Survey questions included following: 1. If you fell ill with seropositive active rheumatoid arthritis, what medications would you start as the first option? 2. At 3 months: if the first option does not – work, what would you take next? 3. At 3 months: if the first option would work, but you cannot really take it for disturbing side effects, what would you take next? Response options, to select one or more, included NSAIDs, Glucocorticoids (GC), and all DMARDs. Background information included age, gender, type and country of practice, and whether the participant was involved in national or international task force of guidelines/recommendations for RA.

Results: A total of 717 rheumatologists (49% female, 50% <50 years old) participated in the survey from 46 countries on 5 continents. The first preferred medication for early active seropositive RA included: MTX monotherapy 69% (sc 36%), MTX-based combination therapy 22%, another cDMARD(s) 2.7%, and biologic agent 6.2% (Figure 1).  Furthermore, 53% would take NSAIDs and 84% GC including 6.3% im, 36% ia, 41% low dose GC, 28% medium dose GC, 1.8% high dose GC, and 16% would not take any GC. In case of inefficacy, options would be MTX monotherapy 15% (sc 78%), MTX-based combination 16%, another cDMARD(s) 8%, biologic agent 60%, and in case of side effects: MTX monotherapy 5.5% (sc 80%), MTX-based combination 4.6%, another cDMARD(s) 20%, biologic agent 70% (Figure 1). The EULAR 2016 recommendation of starting with MTX monotherapy and in case of inefficacy, switching to another cDMARD or adding a biologic was followed by 49% of respondents.  

Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first international effort to evaluate how rheumatologists would treat themselves if they were patients with early seropositive RA. Not surprisingly, biologics are the preferred option in the majority in the case of inefficacy or intolerance to first treatment. Sc MTX administration is preferred by 36% of rheumatologists as first option, despite rarely mentioned in recommendations. This may be a reflection of positive clinical experience using sc MTX. Limitations of the survey include a relatively small number of respondents and better coverage in many countries would be preferred.   Figure 1. Preferred DMARD therapy for early active seropositive RA at the initiation, in case of inefficacy or side effects at 3 months, among 717 rheumatologists around the globe.


Disclosure: K. Aaltonen, None; E. Nikiphorou, None; N. A. Khan, None; T. Sokka, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Aaltonen K, Nikiphorou E, Khan NA, Sokka T. Rheumatologist: If You Fell Ill with Seropositive Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Yourself, What to Do! [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologist-if-you-fell-ill-with-seropositive-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-yourself-what-to-do/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatologist-if-you-fell-ill-with-seropositive-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-yourself-what-to-do/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology