ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2425

Rheumatoid Arthritis Stable Follow up Visits – 3 Month Versus 6 Month Intervals

Mark C. Fisher1 and Deborah S. Collier2, 1Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: laboratory tests, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Specialist visits are a contributing factor to the rising cost of healthcare and payment models increasingly encourage decreased outpatient specialty visits.

Due to monitoring of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or leflunamide, many rheumatologists see patients with stable Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) every 3 months for routine follow up.  We hypothesized that decrease in utilization and cost of outpatient specialty services can be achieved without compromising patient care or safety by seeing these patients every 6 months, with a lab check every 3 months.

Methods

Patients with RA on either methotrexate or sulfasalazine in stable remission or low disease activity were offered visits every 6 months instead of every 3 months, with labwork done at 3 months.  This was part of a Quality Improvement initiative to decrease healthcare costs. 

Outcomes included number of eligible patients for two full time providers over a 6 month period, percent of total established RA patients for these providers deemed appropriate for inclusion, percent of patients who had their labs done, percent of patients with new cytopenia or liver function test (LFT) abnormality, percent of patients who had problems requiring a follow up visit during the 6 month interval, and estimated cost savings.

Results

Over 6 months, 21 eligible patients were identified.  Clinical features are noted in Table 1.  Overall, 14/21 patients were seropositive, either for RF or CCP antibodies, and 12 were positive for both.  10 patients were on combination therapy with a biologic.  The 21 RA patients were out of 184 established RA patients seen for followup visits by two full time providers (11.4%) during the study period (Table 2).  14 of 21 patients (66.7%) had their labs drawn at 3 months.  There were no new cytopenias or LFT abnormalities.  No patients required additional follow up for RA.  One patient required a follow up visit during the 6 month interval for new diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis.  Each saved visit equaled an estimated cost savings of between $92 and $356, depending on the insuror, with an average of $161 saved per visit and $362 per patient annually.

Conclusion

Patients with RA in stable remission or low disease activity can safely and cost effectively be seen at 6 month intervals with labs drawn at 3 months.  There were no new RA issues between visits, and no new laboratory abnormalities.  Patient compliance was good, but could be improved.  This intervention saved an average of $362 per patient annually.

Table 1: Clinical Characteristics

Age

56.8

Gender (female)

82.3%

Ethnicity

 

White

15

Hispanic

6

RF+

13

CCP +

10

Erosive disease

10

Disease duration (years)

8.8

On MTX

24

On SSZ

5

On Leflunamide

1

On Plaquenil

2

On prednisone

1

On biologic (in combination)

10

Etanercept

5

Adalimumab

3

Golimumab

1

Abatacept

1

Table 2: Outcomes

Total Established RA Patient Visits

184

Eligible RA patients

21 (11.4%)

Labs done

14/21 (66.7%)

New Cytopenias

0

New LFT abnormalities

0

Interval Visits

1


Disclosure:

M. C. Fisher,
None;

D. S. Collier,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-stable-follow-up-visits-3-month-versus-6-month-intervals/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology