ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3152

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): Premature Use of Biologics Accelerating in United States (US)

James R. O'Dell1, Stanley B. Cohen2, J Carter Thorne3 and Ted R Mikuls4, 1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 2Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 3Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 4Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Health care cost, medical management, pharmacotherapy, practice improvement and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects VI: Management of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The treatment of RA has changed dramatically in the past several decades with the advent of a large number of new biologic agents as well as trials that have shown the benefits of optimizing the use of conventional disease modifying agents (DMARDs) alone or in combinations. It is not clear how the large number of clinical trials and treatment recommendations related to these issues have influenced RA management. This analysis considers two aspects of DMARD choice and delivery for RA: 1) use of biologic agents as initial DMARD treatment; and 2) use of subcutaneously (SC) administered methotrexate (MTX) in patients who cannot be managed with oral drug. To evaluate trends, these questions were addressed in two patient cohorts, one that started treatment in 2009 and a second that initiated therapy in 2012.

Methods:  The analysis used Symphony Health Solutions’ anonymized patient-level claims data which captures ~274 million US patients and 92% of all prescription drugs dispensed in the United States. The analysis included RA patients identified by ICD-9 codes 714.0 and 714.30 who initiated treatment with oral MTX or a biologic in 2009 or 2012 and were then followed through to 2014. Treatment in the year prior to these treatments was also evaluated. This analysis focused on patients who had a biologic agent as their initial DMARD in 2009 or 2012 and those in whom SC MTX was employed after initiation of therapy with oral drug.

Results: The study included 48,910 patients who started oral MTX or biologic treatment in 2009 and 107,536 who initiated such treatment in 2012. In the 2009 cohort, 13,270 patients (27.1%) initiated treatment with a biologic vs 38,209 (35.6%) in the 2012 cohort (p<0.0001). This difference did not appear to result from differences between groups in baseline demographic or clinical characteristics (Table). A higher percentage of patients in the 2012 cohort received a non-MTX DMARD in the year prior to biologic initiation vs the 2009 cohort (25.4% vs 15.3%, p<0.0001), but even when these patients are excluded from the analysis, the higher initial use of a biologic in the 2012 remained significant (p<0.0001). There was also significantly increased employment of SC MTX in the 2012 cohort. 35,640 patients in the 2009 cohort initiated oral MTX and 20,041 (56.2%) switched away from this treatment over 5 years. Of these, 2,513 (12.5%) were switched to SC MTX. 69,327 patients in the 2012 cohort started oral MTX and 18,989 (27.4%) switched away from this treatment over 2 years. Of these, 3,976 (20.9%) switched to SC MTX (p<0.0001 vs the 2009 cohort).

Conclusion:  This analysis indicated three significant trends in the treatment of RA in the US: 1) increasing use of non-MTX DMARDs prior to the initiation of a biologic; 2) increasing use of a biologic without prior administration of any conventional DMARD; and 3) increasing, but not optimal, employment of SC MTX after use of oral MTX.  


Disclosure: J. R. O'Dell, Medac Pharma, 5,Antares, 5,Eli Lilly and Company, 5,Abbvie, 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5; S. B. Cohen, Medac Pharma, 5; J. C. Thorne, Abbvie, 5,Amgen, 5,AstraZeneca, 5,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5,Centocor, Inc., 5,Celgene, 5,Genzyme Corporation, 5,Hospira, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 5,Genzyme Corporation, 8,Medac Pharma, 8,Antares, 8,Abbvie, 2,Amgen, 2,AstraZeneca, 2,Celgene, 2,Eli Lilly and Company, 2,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2; T. R. Mikuls, Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

O'Dell JR, Cohen SB, Thorne JC, Mikuls TR. Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): Premature Use of Biologics Accelerating in United States (US) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-premature-use-of-biologics-accelerating-in-united-states-us/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-premature-use-of-biologics-accelerating-in-united-states-us/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology