ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 137

Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Risk for Interstitial Lung Disease: A Comparison of Risk Associated with Biologic and Conventional Dmards

Fenglong Xie1, Narender Annapureddy2, Lang Chen1, Jason Leonard Lobo3, Jim C. Oates4, Ankoor Shah5, Huifeng Yun6, Shuo Yang1 and Jeffrey R. Curtis7, 1Division of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 3Med-Pulmonary, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 4Medicine/Rheumatology & Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 5Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 6University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 7Rheumatology & Immunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologics, ICD-9, interstitial lung disease and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster I: Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a rare but often severe consequence of several rheumatologic conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The comparative risk of incident ILD between RA therapies remains undetermined.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using 2006-2014 Medicare and 2010-2015 Market Scan data was conducted to assess the risk of ILD among biologic and conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) users. Adults with at least one ICD-9-CM RA diagnosis code from rheumatologist, initiated at least one biologic or cDMARDs were included. Patients had to have at least 1 year of full coverage (medical and pharmacy) prior to their RA treatment. Those with a diagnosis code for prevalent ILD, malignancy, HIV or organ transplantation (MHO), or prior oxygen use (suggesting treatment for pre-existing ILD) were excluded. Patients initiating cDMARDs with prior exposure to biologic or synthetic DMARDS (all available data) were also excluded. Follow up started at the initiation date of each therapy and ended at the earliest of: event, loss of full coverage, end of exposure (with 90 days extension), switch to other biologic or synthetic DMARDS, diagnosis of MHO (except for lung transplant), or end of study. ILD was defined as: one or more hospital discharge diagnosis code (any position) or 2 outpatient diagnosis codes from a physician visit with diagnostic tests for chest CT or lung biopsy. Incidence rates (IR) of ILD were calculated using Poisson regression; hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using COX regression, accounting for the clustering of RA treatments within patients. Among patients who developed ILD, initiation of home oxygen and death (Medicare only) were reported.

Results:  A total of 150,225 RA patients with 208,641 initiations of biologics or DMARDs were eligible for analysis. A total of 958 patients developed ILD among 199,739 person years, resulting in an overall IR of 4.78 per 1,000 person years. The crude IRs for ILD ranged from a low of 3.05 (95%CI: 1.15-8.14) for tofacitinib to a high of 8.37 (7.29-9.61) for infliximab (INF) in Medicare (Table 1); and a low of 0.58 (0.08-4.13) for certolizumab (CER) to 3.87(2.08-7.19) for INF in Market Scan. Compared to abatacept (ABA), the adjusted HR ranged from 0.82 (0.30-2.22) for tofacitinib to 2.07 (1.62-2.64) for INF in Medicare; from 0.41 (0.05, 3.41) for CER to 2.85 (1.03-7.89) for INF in Market Scan.

Among 880 Medicare patients with ILD, 359 (41%) died after a mean (SD) 529 (640) days since diagnosis; 328 (37%) initiated home oxygen, at a mean (SD) of 177 (418) days. Among 78 Market Scan patients with ILD, 22 (28%) initiated oxygen at a mean (SD) of 114(262) days.  

Conclusion: Compared to ABA, INF, rituximab, adalimumab, tocilizumab and etanercept were associated with increased risk of ILD, although the absolute IR differences between therapies were small. Initiation of home oxygen and mortality was high among RA patients with incident ILD.

Table: Incidence Rates of Interstitial Lung Disease and Adjusted Hazard Ratio in RA Patients

DMARDS

Medicare

Number of patients=104,870

Number of initiations=143,540

Market Scan

Number of patients=45,355

Number of initiations=65,101

 

Event

Person Years

IRs

(95% CI)

aHR*

(95% CI)

Event

Person Years

IRs

(95% CI)

aHR

(95% CI)

ABATACEPT

99

23,939

4.14

 ( 3.40- 5.04)

Reference

6

4,154

1.44

 ( 0.65- 3.21)

Reference

ADALIMUMAB

82

13,382

6.13

 ( 4.94- 7.61)

1.77

 (1.32-2.38)

14

7,268

1.93

 ( 1.14- 3.25)

1.42

(0.54-3.72)

CERTOLIZUMAB

14

4,306

3.25

 ( 1.93- 5.49)

0.83

 (0.48-1.46)

1

17,198

0.58

( 0.08- 4.13)

0.41

 (0.05-3.41)

ETANERCEPT

75

14,038

5.34

 ( 4.26- 6.70)

1.47

 (1.09-1.99)

10

76,838

1.30

( 0.70- 2.42)

0.98

(0.35-2.7)

GOLIMUMAB

15

2,683

5.59

 ( 3.37- 9.27)

1.55

 (0.90-2.67)

2

16,118

1.24

( 0.31- 4.96)

0.93

 (0.19-4.64)

HCQ, LEF, or SSZ

115

25,221

4.56

( 3.80- 5.47)

1.03

 (0.78-1.38)

10

6,877

1.45

 ( 0.78- 2.70)

1.00

(0.34-2.89)

INFLIXIMAB

202

24,136

8.37

( 7.29- 9.61)

2.07

 (1.62-2.64)

10

2,584

3.87

 ( 2.08- 7.19)

2.85

 (1.03-7.89)

METHOTREXATE

174

30,747

5.66

( 4.88- 6.57)

1.28

 (0.97-1.68)

14

8,751

1.60

( 0.95- 2.70)

1.04

 (0.37-2.93)

RITUXIMAB

63

7,968

7.91

( 6.18-10.12)

1.93

 (1.41-2.65)

3

1,519

1.98

( 0.64- 6.13)

1.16

 (0.28-4.71)

TOCILIZUMAB

37

5,666

6.53

( 4.73- 9.01)

1.69

 (1.16-2.47)

4

2,637

1.52

( 0.57- 4.04)

1.03

 (0.29-3.67)

TOFACITINIB

4

1,310

3.05

 ( 1.15- 8.14)

0.82

 (0.30-2.22)

4

1,540

2.60

( 0.97- 6.92)

1.68

(0.47-5.99)

All exposure

880

153,395

5.74

(5.37- 6.13)

 

78

46,344

1.68

(1.35- 2.10)

 

CI: Confidence interval; aHR: Adjusted hazard ratio; IR: Incidence rate, per 1000 years.

* Adjusted for age, sex, systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sicca syndrome, Hemiplegia or paraplegia, Diabetes, hypertension, Pneumonia, Chronic pulmonary disease, Myocardial infarction, Coronary heart disease, Peripheral vascular disorder, Cerebrovascular disease, Dementia, Liver disease.

 


Disclosure: F. Xie, None; N. Annapureddy, None; L. Chen, None; J. L. Lobo, None; J. C. Oates, None; A. Shah, None; H. Yun, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; S. Yang, None; J. R. Curtis, AbbVie, Roche/Genentech, BMS, UCB, Myraid, Lilly, Amgen, Janssen, Pfizer, Corrona, 5,Amgen, Pfizer, Crescendo Bio, Corrona, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Xie F, Annapureddy N, Chen L, Lobo JL, Oates JC, Shah A, Yun H, Yang S, Curtis JR. Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Risk for Interstitial Lung Disease: A Comparison of Risk Associated with Biologic and Conventional Dmards [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-and-the-risk-for-interstitial-lung-disease-a-comparison-of-risk-associated-with-biologic-and-conventional-dmards/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/rheumatoid-arthritis-and-the-risk-for-interstitial-lung-disease-a-comparison-of-risk-associated-with-biologic-and-conventional-dmards/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology