ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 929

Retinal Examinations Among SLE Patients Newly-Initiating Hydroxychloroquine in a U.S. Medicaid SLE Population, 2000-10

Tzu-Chieh Lin1, CH Feldman2, Hongshu Guan3, Sarah Chen4, Medha Barbhaiya1 and Karen H. Costenbader1, 1Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Examination, Lupus and hydroxychloroquine

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Health Services Research I: Workforce and Quality of Care in Rheumatology

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: U.S. Medicaid provides medical benefits to low-income people. Although the Federal government establishes guidelines, each state sets vision benefits. The American Academy of Ophthalmology recommends a baseline retinal examination at hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) initiation and periodically thereafter, but there is lack of real-world practice information. We investigated the proportion of SLE Medicaid patients newly-initiating HCQ who receive indicated retinal exams and identified factors associated with receiving this care.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of SLE patients 18-65 years old in Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) from the 29 most populated U.S. states, 2000-2010.  SLE patients were identified by ≥ 3 codes for ICD-9 710.0, each ≥ 30 days apart, in hospital discharge diagnoses and physician visit claims. HCQ new-users were identified by a new HCQ prescription fill (index date) after 1st SLE code, with no HCQ use in the prior 12 months. We restricted to those with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment before and after index date to assess both ophthalmologic and retinal exams, identified by CPT and HCPCS codes. Comorbidities and healthcare utilization were collected from the 12 months before index date. Examination rates were calculated across calendar years and by comorbidity and healthcare utilization subgroups. Differences between patients with and without exams were detected by the difference in means or proportions of a variable divided by a pooled estimate of the standard deviation of the variable.

Results: We identified 12,755 SLE patients newly starting HCQ. Proportions of patients undergoing exams 1 year before or after initial HCQ prescription ranged from 35.8 to 42.8% for ophthalmologic exams and 4.7 to 7.7% for retinal exams during year 2001-2009. Patients who received ophthalmologic exams, compared to those who had not, were older (40.8 ± 12.1 vs. 37.5 ± 11.5 years), more were White/Hispanic/Asian vs. Black. They also had more comorbid conditions and had received more SLE-related lab tests (ANA, anti-dsDNA, C3, C4) in the pre-index period. The proportions of lupus nephritis patients (35.2%) and pregnant patients (32.6%) who had any ophthalmologic exam were among the lowest. Overall, a high proportion of SLE patients newly starting HCQ did not have any Medicaid claims for retinal exams (92.7%) or even for any ophthalmologic exam (55.2%) in the 1 year before and 1 year after HCQ initiation. (Table)  

Conclusion: The proportions of U.S. Medicaid SLE patients starting HCQ who received ophthalmologic and retinal exams were extremely low overall, possibly due to state-dependent vision coverage. SLE patients may not be getting these indicated exams or they may be paying out-of-pocket or through supplemental vision insurance. Future studies will examine state-to-state variation in retinal exam rates and Medicaid vision coverage.

Table. Proportions of 12,755 SLE Patients Newly-Initiating HCQ who Received Ophthalmologic and Retinal Exams in the Year prior to or following First HCQ Prescription Fill

Ophthalmologic Exams

Retinal Exams

Any baseline examsa, %

22.8

2.8

  Baseline exams only, %

13.8

2.2

Exams both before and after HCQ initiation, %

9.0

0.6

After HCQ initiation onlyb

22.1

4.5

No exams both before and after HCQ initiation

55.2

92.7

a During the one year prior to initial HCQ prescription fill b During the one year on or after initial HCQ prescription fill Codes for any ophthalmologic exams: CPT codes: 92002,92004,92012,92014,92018,92019,92225,92227,92228,92250,92230,92235,92240,92250,92260 HCPCS: S0620,S0621,S0625,S3000 Codes for retinal exams:

CPT‐4 code(s) : 92225, 92227,92228, 92250 HCPCS: S0625 and S3000


Disclosure: T. C. Lin, None; C. Feldman, None; H. Guan, None; S. Chen, None; M. Barbhaiya, None; K. H. Costenbader, UpToDate, 7.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lin TC, Feldman C, Guan H, Chen S, Barbhaiya M, Costenbader KH. Retinal Examinations Among SLE Patients Newly-Initiating Hydroxychloroquine in a U.S. Medicaid SLE Population, 2000-10 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/retinal-examinations-among-sle-patients-newly-initiating-hydroxychloroquine-in-a-u-s-medicaid-sle-population-2000-10/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/retinal-examinations-among-sle-patients-newly-initiating-hydroxychloroquine-in-a-u-s-medicaid-sle-population-2000-10/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology