ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 959

Results from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Systemic JIA Consensus Treatment Plans Pilot Study

Yukiko Kimura1, Timothy Beukelman2, Esi Morgan-DeWitt3, Kelly L. Mieszkalski4, Thomas Brent Graham5, Maria F. Ibarra6, Norman Ilowite7, Marisa S. Klein-Gitelman8, Karen Onel9, Sampath Prahalad10, Marilynn G. Punaro11, Sarah Ringold12, Dana Toib13, Heather Van Mater14, Pamela F. Weiss15, Laura Schanberg16 and the CARRA Registry Investigators, 1Pediatric Rheumatology, Joseph M Sanzari Children’s Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, 2Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Pediatric rheumatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 4Rheumatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 5Pediatric Rheumatology, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN, 6Pediatric Rheumatolgy, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, 7Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, NY, 8Division of Rheumatology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 9Pediatric Rheumatology, Univ of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 10Rheumatology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 11Texas Scottish Rite Hospital, Dallas, TX, 12Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, 13Pediatric Rheumnatology, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, 14Duke Pediatric Rheumatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 15Rheumatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 16Duke University, Durham, NC

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologic agents, DMARDs, Systemic JIA and glucocorticoids

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology - Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects I: Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Systemic JIA (sJIA) in usual
practice is commonly treated with several agents, including glucocorticoids
(GC), methotrexate (MTX) and biologic agents, most commonly IL1 or IL6
inhibitors, which may be given alone or in combination with GC. The most
effective treatment for new onset sJIA is not known.  The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology
Research Alliance (CARRA) developed standardized consensus treatment plans
(CTPs) for new onset sJIA to study the comparative
effectiveness of these treatments using an observational registry. A pilot
study was conducted to assess the feasibility of using the CTPs for this
purpose.

Methods:

New onset untreated sJIA patients
(pts) enrolled in the CARRA Registry at one of 15 pilot sites were treated
according to the CTP selected by the treating physician (GC alone; MTX ±
GC; IL1 inhibitor (IL1i) ± GC; IL6 inhibitor (IL6i) ± GC).
Deviations from the chosen CTP could occur for inadequate response at any time.
If GC was started, the CTPs suggested an aggressive taper (<50% of the
starting dose by 3 months). Data were collected at standard intervals consistent
with usual practice and the primary outcome of clinically inactive disease (CID)
and successful cessation of GC was assessed at the 9 month visit. The CTPs were
compared using chi square, Fisher’s exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests.  

Results:

30 patients were enrolled and completed the study (Table). There
were not major differences between patients in each CTP, but patients treated
with GC CTP alone tended to be older, non-white, have oligoarthritis,
and be more likely to have very high ferritin levels. 83% of the MTX CTP
treated patients had physicians who reported that they always select this
treatment, as did 42% of the patients in the IL1i CTP. The study outcome was
achieved by 37% of patients overall. No patients in the GC or MTX CTP achieved
the study outcome, while 42% and 60% in the IL1i and IL6i CTPs did,
respectively. There were 2 serious adverse events; both were infections that
occurred while receiving IL1i. There were 2 episodes of macrophage activation
syndrome: 1 each in IL1i and IL6i CTPs. All patients recovered.

Conclusion:

The CARRA sJIA CTP pilot study was
successfully completed. The patients enrolled appeared reasonably balanced at
baseline. The study outcome was achieved by 37% of patients treated with a
biologic, and by none treated with GC alone or MTX.  Having demonstrated feasibility of the CTPs,
additional patients will be enrolled as part of a larger comparative
effectiveness study to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for
new onset SJIA.

Table: sJIA Patients Enrolled in CTP Pilot Study and their
Outcomes

Characteristic

GC

MTX

IL1i

IL6i

Total

p value

N

2

6

12

10

30

Age (median)

12.5

3.3

3.9

9.0

5.5

0.044

Female (%)

50%

67%

92%

90%

83%

0.3

White (%)

0%

83%

33%

80%

57%

0.03

Disease duration (median)

116.5

38.0

31.0

55.0

42.5

0.21

Polyarthritis (%)

0%

50%

67%

80%

63%

0.2

Number of active joints

at enrollment (median)

1

4.5

5

5.5

4.5

0.3

Hemoglobin (median)

8.9

9.6

9.6

10.8

10.1

0.09

ESR >3x ULN (%)

100%

67%

91%

43%

73%

0.3

CRP >3x ULN (%)

100%

83%

91%

40%

79%

0.3

Ferritin (median)

12,874

1,394

1,062

627

783

0.09

CHAQ (median)

0.9

1.3

1.9

0.8

1.4

0.6

Patient pain score (median)

3

6.5

6

7.5

6

0.6

Physician global (median)

4

7

5

5

5.5

0.1

Results

CID at 9 months (%)

0%

33%

42%

60%

48%

0.4

GC cessation at 9 months (%)

50%

17%

83%

80%

67%

0.03

CID+ GC cessation at 9 months (%)

0%

0%

42%

60%

37%

0.07


Disclosure: Y. Kimura, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,SOBI, 5; T. Beukelman, UCB, 5,Genentech/Roche, 5,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5; E. Morgan-DeWitt, None; K. L. Mieszkalski, None; T. B. Graham, None; M. F. Ibarra, None; N. Ilowite, Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,SOBI, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5; M. S. Klein-Gitelman, None; K. Onel, None; S. Prahalad, None; M. G. Punaro, None; S. Ringold, None; D. Toib, None; H. Van Mater, None; P. F. Weiss, None; L. Schanberg, UCB, 5,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2,SOBI, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kimura Y, Beukelman T, Morgan-DeWitt E, Mieszkalski KL, Graham TB, Ibarra MF, Ilowite N, Klein-Gitelman MS, Onel K, Prahalad S, Punaro MG, Ringold S, Toib D, Van Mater H, Weiss PF, Schanberg L. Results from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Systemic JIA Consensus Treatment Plans Pilot Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/results-from-the-childhood-arthritis-and-rheumatology-research-alliance-systemic-jia-consensus-treatment-plans-pilot-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/results-from-the-childhood-arthritis-and-rheumatology-research-alliance-systemic-jia-consensus-treatment-plans-pilot-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology