ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2668

Responsiveness of University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium (GIT2.0) and Intestinal Visual Analogue Scale to Change in Systemic Sclerosis Patients

Yossra A Suliman1, Suzanne Kafaja2, Mohamed Alemam3, yasser Shaweesh4, Kasra Tavakoli5 and Daniel E. Furst6, 1Rheumatology and Rehabilitation dept., Rheumatology and Rehabilitation dept. Assiut university hospital, Assiut Egypt, Assiut, Egypt, 2Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Los Angeles, CA, 3Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, Assistant Lecturer, Qena, Egypt, 4John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of cook county, chicago, IL, 5Department of medicine, university of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 6David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: gastrointestinal complications, patient outcomes and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the most common internal organ involvement. Among the few validated patient-reported outcome measures for GI involvement are the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium (GIT2.0) and intestinal visual analogue scale (GI-VAS) The latter is a component of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire[SHAQ]). Our aim was to evaluate the comparative responsiveness of these outcome measures when pts are treated and to evaluate the correlation between UCLA-SCTC GIT 2.0 and GI-VAS in our SSc population.

Methods:

115 SSc pts with two or more consecutive visits were enrolled in our study. Values of UCLA-SCTC GIT 2.0 and GI-VAS were completed by all patients at both visits,; any change in GI medication at the baseline visit was reported. ). UCLA-SCTC GIT2.0 includes 34 questions in 7 domains (reflux, distension, soilage, diarrhea, social function, emotional wellbeing and constipation). GI-VAS is a 100 mm VAS that asks the patient, how did GI symptoms interfere with patient function. Paired T test was used to detect the change between the two visits in both GIT 2.0 and GI-VAS. Pearson correlation was used to correlate tests at base line.

Results:

Ninety eight (85%) of SSc pts were females, Mean age 52 yrs (SD ± 12.9); median disease duration 7 (4-11), diffuse subtype 57 pts (50%), (47%), median baseline GIT 2.0 is 0.3 (0.1-0.7) and median baseline GI-VAS 0.8 (0-4.1) table 1.

Out of the 115 pts, only 41 pts needed a change of GI medication at base line visit (37.0%). A statistically significant difference was noted when comparing GIT scores before and after adding a new GI treatment (p=0.006, 95% CI= .05956 to 0.29258). On the other hand, GI-VAS did not show statistical differences between baseline visit and follow-up after adding medications (p=0.963, 95% CI =-0.937 to 0.89588).Baseline correlation between GIT2.0 (total score) and GI-VAS were (r= 0.657 ) moderate.

Conclusion:

: Both UCLA-SCTC GIT2.0 and GI -VAS reflect GIT involvement. Unlike the GI-VAS, the UCLA-SCTC GIT2.0 was responsive to treatment . These results also, shows that both tests may represent different aspects of GI involvement and might be considered separately in clinical evaluation of GI system in SSc patients. Discussion: More patients are to be included in this cohort, as the pts had low GIT scores( few symptoms ), multiple GI treatments were used and this is a retrospective evaluation of prospectively gathered data.

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of systemic sclerosis patients

Variable

Mean(SD, Range), number (percentage)

Age

52 (12.9)

females

98(85%)

Body mass index (BMI), mean (SD)

24.1(5.7)

Disease duration

7 (4-11)

Intestinal GI- VAS

0.8(0-9.5)

UCLA GIT 2.0

0.3 (0.1- 2.15)

Interstitial lung disease

66 (57%)

FVC

89% (23.2)

Pulmonary artery hypertension

19 (16%)


Disclosure: Y. A. Suliman, None; S. Kafaja, None; M. Alemam, None; Y. Shaweesh, None; K. Tavakoli, None; D. E. Furst, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Suliman YA, Kafaja S, Alemam M, Shaweesh Y, Tavakoli K, Furst DE. Responsiveness of University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium (GIT2.0) and Intestinal Visual Analogue Scale to Change in Systemic Sclerosis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/responsiveness-of-university-of-california-los-angeles-scleroderma-clinical-trial-consortium-git2-0-and-intestinal-visual-analogue-scale-to-change-in-systemic-sclerosis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/responsiveness-of-university-of-california-los-angeles-scleroderma-clinical-trial-consortium-git2-0-and-intestinal-visual-analogue-scale-to-change-in-systemic-sclerosis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology