ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1559

Residual Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis Triggers Treatment Adjustment in Only a Quarter of Patients in Daily Clinical Practice

Leonieke van Mens1, Sadaf Atiqi2, Inka Fluri2, Marleen van de Sande3, Arno van Kuijk4 and Dominique Baeten1, 1AMC, Amsterdam Immunology and Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Amsterdam Immunology and Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 4Reade, Amsterdam Immunology and Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Clinical practice, Psoriatic arthritis, remission and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: With expanding therapeutic possibilities for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) it will be increasingly important to determine residual disease and define when to adjust treatment. The rationale behind treatment decisions in current daily clinical practice and the relation with residual disease activity has not been investigated.

The aim of this study was to assess the current clinical practice on defining residual disease and the subsequent treatment decisions made in PsA patients.

Methods: This cross sectional study included 142 consecutive PsA patients who visited the outpatient clinic. The treating rheumatologist scored disease activity and her/his opinion on the presence of residual disease and the subsequent treatment decisions made. Patients scored patient disease activity scores.

Results: Two thirds (90/142) of the patients had musculoskeletal residual disease activity, with half of those having even moderate to high disease activity according to CDAI. There were no differences between the groups with or without residual disease activity in gender, disease duration, comorbidity, current treatment duration or number of previously used cDMARDS. Residual disease activity was more frequently reported in patients treated with a cDMARD only or a 2nd TNFi. 74% of the patients with residual disease activity were currently treated with either a cDMARD only or a first TNFi, suggesting that treatment modification could be an option. Of the 90 patients with residual disease, in 21(23%) treatment adjustment was initiated. Treatment changes were considered less frequent in those patients treated with a 2nd TNFi. No differences were seen in disease activity and demographics between those with or without a treatment adjustment. Judgment by the physician and/or patient rather than objective hurdles to treatment intensification (absence of additional treatment options, lack of compliance, intolerance) drove the decision not to modify treatment.

Conclusion: In almost 2/3 of the patients there was a presence of residual disease activity but only resulted in treatment adjustment in only a minority. As the adjustment could not be explained by comorbidities or a lack of treatment options there is clearly a further need for research to understand why disease activity does not lead to treatment adjustment in these cases.


Disclosure: L. van Mens, None; S. Atiqi, None; I. Fluri, None; M. van de Sande, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, 5; A. van Kuijk, UCB, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen, 2,Novartis, Celgene, 5; D. Baeten, UCB, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

van Mens L, Atiqi S, Fluri I, van de Sande M, van Kuijk A, Baeten D. Residual Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis Triggers Treatment Adjustment in Only a Quarter of Patients in Daily Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/residual-disease-activity-in-psoriatic-arthritis-triggers-treatment-adjustment-in-only-a-quarter-of-patients-in-daily-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/residual-disease-activity-in-psoriatic-arthritis-triggers-treatment-adjustment-in-only-a-quarter-of-patients-in-daily-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology