ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 443

Repetitive Requisition of Antinuclear Antibody Testing (ANA) in Outpatient Multispecialty Clinics in Patients with a Known Positive ANA

Laura Amorese-O'Connell1, Pinky Vaidya2, Durkhani Mahboob2, Charis Gn3 and Stuart Schwartz4, 1Rheumatology, Brown University, RI hospital, Providence, RI, 2Rheumatology, Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, RI, 3Internal Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 4Brown Medical School, Providence, RI

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: ANA

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   ANA test is a commonly used initial screening for connective tissue diseases (CTD). The ultimate clinical utility of this highly sensitive test depends on the pretest diagnostic probability. It should not be a first line test for the investigation of musculoskeletal symptoms like fatigue or joint pains, unless accompanied by other clinical features to suggest autoimmune disease. It can be positive in multiple autoimmune and mixed connective tissue disorders. It can also be falsely positive in multiple other scenarios. ANA test rarely needs to be repeated. It is a diagnostic, not monitoring test. If an unexpected result is given, it is reasonable to repeat the test to confirm the finding. It is also useful to repeat if a person’s illness has significantly changed. It, however, has no correlation to disease activity in SLE or other CTD. A trend of repeating ANA testing on patients with a history of positive ANA was noted in our outpatient multispecialty clinic. The purpose of this study is to review how frequently patients with known positive ANA testing undergo repeat ANA testing, the reason for it and the specialty and level of training of providers ordering it.

Methods:   Retrospective chart review was performed on 598 patients who underwent ANA testing between April 1st, 2015 and March 31st, 2016. Data collected included: Age, gender, positive ANA test result, reason for ordering ANA, specialty and level of training of provider ordering ANA. Patients with a positive ANA were identified first followed by review of number of repeat ANA testing after first positive result. Data analyzed using percentage to determine frequency of events.

Results:   Of the total of 598 patients undergoing ANA testing between April 1st 2015 and March 31st 2016, 196 (32.8%) patients had a positive result. All patients were older than 18 years, 140 (71.4%) were females and 56 (28.6%) were males. Repeat ANA was noted in 111 (56.6%) patients. Of those, 58 (52.2%) patients had repeat testing once, 23 (25.5%) twice, 11 (9.9%) three times, 8 (7.2) four times, 2 (1.8%) five times, and 9 (8.1%) six or more times. There were 2 patients who underwent repeat ANA test 33 and 56 times. A total of 194 (64.4%) of 301 providers ordering repeat ANA testing were identified. Rest were not available. Most were rheumatologists 76 (39.1%) and primary care physicians 67 (34.5%). Remaining included gastroenterology, pulmonary, dermatology, nephrology and emergency medicine. Majority of repeat tests wherein data was available (172 total) were ordered by attending physicians 162 (94.1%).

Conclusion:   Further education and emphasis should be given on appropriate ANA testing criteria in order to decrease misuse and increase cost effectiveness.


Disclosure: L. Amorese-O'Connell, None; P. Vaidya, None; D. Mahboob, None; C. Gn, None; S. Schwartz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Amorese-O'Connell L, Vaidya P, Mahboob D, Gn C, Schwartz S. Repetitive Requisition of Antinuclear Antibody Testing (ANA) in Outpatient Multispecialty Clinics in Patients with a Known Positive ANA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/repetitive-requisition-of-antinuclear-antibody-testing-ana-in-outpatient-multispecialty-clinics-in-patients-with-a-known-positive-ana/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/repetitive-requisition-of-antinuclear-antibody-testing-ana-in-outpatient-multispecialty-clinics-in-patients-with-a-known-positive-ana/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology