ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1671

Renal Relapses Are Common in Lupus Nephritis

Angela Pakozdi1, Ravindra Rajakariar2, Michael Sheaff3 and Dev Pyne1, 1Rheumatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, 2Renal Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, 3Histopathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: immunosuppressants, lupus nephritis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Biomarker, Translational and Nephritis Studies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose Renal relapses are part of the natural history of lupus nephritis (LN) and represent a significant challenge not only because they are associated with an increased risk of decline in renal function, but also there is a cumulative toxicity of immunosuppressive treatments. In this retrospective study, we aimed to review renal flare frequency and management in a large single centre cohort of adult LN patients. 

Methods Patients with biopsy proven LN were identified from our electronic database. LN classes based on glomerular pathology were defined according to the ISN/RPS classification. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from electronic records of patients. Complete remission (CR) was defined as proteinuria <0.5g/day, whilst partial remission (PR) was defined as >50% reduction in baseline proteinuria achieving <2g/day. We defined proteinuric flares as proteinuria >1g/day in patients with CR, and doubling of proteinuria in cases of PR.

Results 104 (87%) of 119 SLE patients with biopsy proven LN achieved either CR (n=84, 81%) or PR (n=20, 19%). 34 (33%) had at least one flare (27 had preceding CR and 7 had PR); among those 8 had >2 flares (19%). 21 patients (64%) had class 3 or 4 LN, 7 (21%) class 5 LN, 4 (12%) class 2 LN and 1 (3%) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The median time between remission and relapse was 29 months (IQR, 16-66) in CR, and 13 months (IQR, 3-32) in PR (p=0.089). The maintenance immunosuppressive drug at time of flare was Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF, n=13, 42%) or Azathioprine (AZA, n=10, 32%).  15 (48%) had Angiotensin blockers (ATB), and 22 (71%) were on low dose Corticosteroids (CS) (<10mg/day). Non-adherence to treatment at time of relapse was documented in 7 cases (22%). At the time of flare, the median proteinuria was 1.7g (IQR, 1.3-3.2) in CR, and 2.5g (IQR, 1.4-3.8) in PR. 14 (41%) had raised Creatinine, 14 had raised dsDNA (47%), 18 had low complements (56%) at flare. To treat relapse, 13 patients (45%) started a new immunosuppressive drug (Cyclophosphamide n=6, MMF n=5, Rituximab n=1 or AZA n=1), 3 (10%) had immunosuppressive drug dose escalation, 4 (14%) were treated with CS alone, and 6 (21%) were treated with ATB. After treatment, proteinuric outcome was available for 24 patients: 16 patients (67%) achieved CR, 6 (25%) reached PR, whilst 2 (8%) did not go into remission. 5 patients (15%) reached stage 5 chronic kidney disease after the flare. 

Conclusion LN renal flares are common. Our study shows that a third of LN patients develop at least one relapse after reaching remission, usually within 3 years. The length of time to flare tends to be shorter in cases of preceding PR than in CR. Lack of adherence to long term immunosuppression was identified as a significant factor in LN flare (22% cohort). Patients with LN in remission require close follow-up.


Disclosure:

A. Pakozdi,
None;

R. Rajakariar,
None;

M. Sheaff,
None;

D. Pyne,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/renal-relapses-are-common-in-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology