ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1469

Remission, Low Level Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and Relapse in Patients With Early-Onset, Adult-Onset and Late-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Adriana Vázquez-Hernández1, Emilio Godinez-Lazarini2, Erik Cimé-Aké2 and Hilda Fragoso-Loyo3, 1Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Immunology and Rheumatology Department, Mexico City, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 2Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición. Salvador Zubirán. Immunology and Rheumatology Department, Mexico City, Mexico, 3Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Damage Index, Disease Activity, Neuropsychiatry, risk factors, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1467–1516) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), differences have been observed between patients of different ages at onset. This study evaluates remission, low disease activity, and relapse in patients with SLE at different ages of onset.

Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort study. We included patients classified with SLE according to the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria, divided into three groups based on age at onset: early-onset (SLEe < 18 years), adult-onset (SLEa 18–49 years), and late-onset (SLEl ≥50 years). We excluded patients with other autoimmune diseases, except for antiphospholipid syndrome or Sjögren's syndrome. Information was collected through medical record review to obtain demographic data, disease characteristics (disease activity assessed by SLEDAI-2K, accrual damage by SLICC/ACR-DI, autoantibodies, and treatment); and outcomes (remission defined according to DORIS; low disease activity defined according to LLDAS and relapse defined by SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index). The analysis period began at the date of diagnosis and included all rheumatology follow-up visits until relapse, death, or the last recorded rheumatology visit before December 2024. Demographic and disease characteristics were recorded at onset and during the follow-up period. Outcomes were assessed during follow-up.

Results: We included 289 SLE patients: 96 in the SLEe, 96 in the SLEa and 97 in the SLEl group. A total 90.5% were women. At disease onset, patients in the SLEa group exhibited higher disease activity compared to the other groups. Neuropsychiatric manifestations were more frequent in the SLEe group, whereas mucocutaneous manifestations and lupus nephritis were more prevalent in the SLEa group (Table 1). SLEa group compared to SLEe and SLEl had more prevalence of positive anti-cardiolipin IgG (46.2% vs. 34.2% vs 14%, p< 0.001), IgM (54.9% vs. 50.6% vs. 20.9%, p< 0.001) and positive lupus anticoagulant (27.3% vs. 16.9% vs. 7.1%, p=0.002). In contrast, SLEe group showed a higher prevalence of positive anti-β2 glycoprotein I compared to SLEa and SLEl (IgG: 29.9% vs. 22.7% vs. 1.2%, p< 0.001; IgM: 38.2% vs. 21.3% vs. 9.3%, p< 0.001). Differences in treatment among the groups are summarized in Table 1. Remission and LLDAS were more frequently achieved in the SLEl group compared to the SLEe and SLEa groups. Relapses were more frequent in SLEe group compared to the other groups (Table 1). Moreover, severe relapses were more common in SLEe patients than in those with SLEa or SLEl (63.5% vs. 42.7% vs. 14.4%, p< 0.001). Risk factors associated with relapse in studied patients included SLEe (HR 1.9, 95% CI, 1.4-2.8, p=0.008), constitutional manifestations at onset (HR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.2-2.2, p=0.048) and lupus nephritis during follow-up (HR 1.7, 95% CI, 1.2-2.4, p=0.024) (Table 2). Deaths occurred predominantly in SLEl group, with infections being the leading cause. Survival analysis of the outcomes is presented in Figure 1.

Conclusion: Patients with SLEe experienced more frequent relapses, while those with SLEl more often achieved remission and low disease activity. SLEe, constitutional manifestations at onset and lupus nephritis during follow-up were identified as risk factors for relapse.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Demographic, clinical, auto-antibodies and treatment of studied patients.

Data are expressed as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range). Statistical analysis: Chi-square test was used for nominal variables, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for numerical variables.

APS: antiphospholipid syndrome, SAH: systemic arterial hypertension, AIHA: autoimmune hemolytic anemia, SLEDAI-2K: SLE disease activity index 2000, SDI: SLICC/ACR damage index, LLDAS: low level disease activity state, ACLF: acute on chronic liver failure.

*Statistically significant.

Supporting image 2Table 2. Factors associated with relapses in SLE patients (n=289).

Data are expressed as median (interquartile range). Statistical analysis: the log rank test was used for univariate analysis, and the Cox regression with Bonferroni correction was used for multivariate analysis.

NPSLE: neuropsychiatric SLE, LN: lupus nephritis, aCL: anti-cardiolipin, aβ2GPI: anti-β2 glycoprotein I.

*Statistically significant.

Supporting image 3Figure 1. Survival analysis of the outcomes according to SLE groups (n=289).

Statistical analysis: the log rank test was used to find differences in time to different outcomes comparing the age of onset of SLE groups.

LLDAS: low level disease activity state.


Disclosures: A. Vázquez-Hernández: None; E. Godinez-Lazarini: None; E. Cimé-Aké: None; H. Fragoso-Loyo: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vázquez-Hernández A, Godinez-Lazarini E, Cimé-Aké E, Fragoso-Loyo H. Remission, Low Level Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and Relapse in Patients With Early-Onset, Adult-Onset and Late-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/remission-low-level-disease-activity-state-lldas-and-relapse-in-patients-with-early-onset-adult-onset-and-late-onset-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/remission-low-level-disease-activity-state-lldas-and-relapse-in-patients-with-early-onset-adult-onset-and-late-onset-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology